Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 81
  • 5
    47
  • 4
    18
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

I read a lot of reviews before choosing. I decided to take these. 265/65/17 on Prado 120. Who says that they are very noisy - do not agree! Even at 140 they are almost inaudible. Maybe the profile matters. Or check the pressure. Should be 2.3. Or maybe they stuck a pattern on the tire fitting, or you just have poor sound insulation. In my opinion, this rubber is only for SUVs and not for SUVs. The pattern gives the car an aggressive look. Digs - be healthy! The most for driving 70% - city…

Pros
  • Some advantages
Cons
  • There is none of them

I was specially waiting for winter and snow to check how it behaves - it’s good in the city, even when there is porridge, a little ice and rolled snow, but you need to be careful. In moderate frost it does not tan, in a strong one did not go. When driving off asphalt in winter, there are difficulties with icy or rolled roads with elevation changes and slopes - it is better to change shoes.

Pros
  • Versatility, wear resistance, strong, comfort, appearance. Worth Tiguan II 4x4 in dimension 235x55r18 speed index V. Departure on her summer season and a bit of winter. The first is the appearance - it immediately sunk into my soul, it looks a little brutal with a beautiful sidewall)). Secondly, it is a truly versatile tire, excellent driving performance on any road. You can safely move off the asphalt without worrying that there will be severe problems. Strong sidewall with curb protection. Managed to ride it on almost all surfaces. The rubber is quiet for its pattern, the nuance is in shortcomings. It behaves perfectly on the pavement, it even managed to catch emergency braking - it did not disappoint. Very comfortable rubber, small, most nasty joints practically does not notice. I keep the pressure a little lower than the recommended one (2.2 instead of 2.3). . The rubber is soft - you don’t drive on it, it is designed more for comfortable movement, and not for sharp maneuvers. But how she rides on the dirt road is just a fairy tale. This tire is the king of primers, I don’t even slow down when the asphalt ends, there is almost no difference (if there are not deep enough bumps, even considering that the tigi has a stiff suspension), it amazingly swallows small stones and sand. It goes well in the mud, but there are problems with leaving the rut - you need to rev properly (this despite the fact that the more asphalt yokohama geolandar suv g055 that I had on my previous Tiguan got out of such places with surprising ease). Here they write that it is poorly cleaned - it is perfectly cleaned of dirt and clay, you just need to turn off the esp sometimes and rev it well;)) Small stones get stuck in the tread - yes. Perfectly copes with a dry rocky surface, where the yoka passed, wet grass. I rode on sharp stones - not a single scratch (I made my way on the yoke with difficulty, and after that I was all pokotsana and even had a cut). There is a nuance - when I put it on a wider disk - it became a little harder.
Cons
  • Price, workmanship (wtf michelin?). In fact, the biggest drawback is the price, the rest is tolerable: Fuel consumption is slightly increased, by about 0.5 - 1.0 l compared to the factory highway in urban mode (extra-urban ~ 0.3 l). There is a nuance in terms of noise - at a speed of about 60-70 km it hums (I sin on quality), but at a speed above 100 it is almost inaudible, and the higher the speed, the less stressful noise. It seemed to balance normally, but visually on 2 disks out of 4 - eight (hence, presumably, the rumble at a certain speed) When I had a 2022-made jetta on michelin primacy - not a single complaint, but these French and quality problems. Creaking when cornering at high outside temperatures

Revainrating 4 out of 5

All is well, liked the product, didn't buy it for nothing.

Good afternoon. My dimension is 235/60/16. Made in France. In general, tires are worth the money, especially for the 50/50 city / country road mode. Purely for the city, so-so because of the noise and terrible sensitivity to the track (although this may only apply to this width), it steers on asphalt with a slight delay (woolness). You get pleasure on the primer - soft, there are not enough stones and gravel, it steers perfectly. The first two seasons (April-November), the presence of water on

Pros
  • Very soft, you do not feel the asphalt coating at all. Very tenacious on the pavement - slows down to the spot. Doesn't wobble on hard acceleration. There is practically no hydroplaning in the first 20 thousand. It rows well in mud and muddy grass.
Cons
  • It bites into a rut on the pavement - the car has to be constantly kept or taxied so as not to be thrown out. After grinding to the first mark, the car began to get up on the water, it did not affect the patency in any way. Noise louder than winter spikes (surprise). The noise is monotonous, but appears already at 40 mph.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

We must understand that the disadvantages follow from the advantages. For durability, you have to pay with increased fuel consumption. Unfortunately noisy. Otherwise, only positive impressions. Subaru Outback car, The size was set to non-standard 215/60/17 instead of 215/55/17, so I won’t write about handling and steering sharpness, it will be incorrect (In my opinion, there was no strong deterioration). I skated on it for 2.5 seasons (about 70 thousand km). So where he killed two wheels…

Pros
  • Very strong, armor-piercing sidewall, high tread. Wear is slow. You can not run with the first snow in the tire shop.
Cons
  • Heavy. Noisy. There is a slight hum in some speed ranges. Increased fuel consumption compared to conventional road tires.

Properties (softness, noise, dynamism during takeoff and braking) depend on pressure: up to 2.1 - soft, quiet, a little awkward, from 2.2 - softness goes away, control over the road increases. With a slight minus and snow - no worse than winter (wheel drive - full). The price is less than 4000 - very even. When compared with the old French Michelin of the same category SUV - just a fairy tale. I don't regret it. Polish quality - time will tell.

Pros
  • Track, and the road in general, holds, noise is not very loud, in corners and on the water without surprises.
Cons
  • Stones clings directly from the road and scatters in all directions very noticeably.

long chose what kind of tires to replace the worn-out Kumho. The choice fell on several manufacturers: Uniroyal, Bridgestone and Michelin. Uniroyal is an excellent rain tire, but expensive, very soft and has a weak sidewall (punctures and hernias). I read the reviews and eventually settled on the Michelin Latitude Cross 255/55 R18, tk. I needed a rubber with the ability to use on the primer. I have only been using it for the first month, and here are my first impressions: 1) this is definitely

Pros
  • reliable, time-tested brand
Cons
  • high price, noisy, rolling in braking

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

265/65 R17, Pajero Sport 2, replaced Dunlop Grandtrek AT3. I wanted to counterbalance quiet and soft "slightly-AT" tires. Workmanship: 4, balanced "usually" Value for money: 4, because there are very good Toyo and Yoko, and they are cheaper Ease of use: -1 for noisiness, -1 for hydroplaning Pros: Soft sidewall - affects the behavior of the suspension when driving over bumps. A double, like those Michelins, conveys noticeably less "road" to the cabin than a triple on the Dunlop Grandtrek…

Complete set purchased 3 years ago. I bought it for a spare tire, because spare 12 years. Scary 😨. Some pros: SOFTNESS! I use it for summer. I change shoes with studded Hakkapelita at an average temperature of 0 * C. Doesn't dub at -10. I take the primer to the dacha with a slope of 12 - 15 degrees, even on ice, I take it in flight (all-wheel drive). Centered great. Got cons: Sometimes the effect of aquaplaning is felt at a speed of 90 or more km / h, but on an all-wheel drive crossover, if…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

Bought these tires in April 2022. Size 215/75/R15, 2nd generation Honda CR-V. To date, dashed off on them 27,000 km. Tires are great! Not noisy, soft, comfortable! Passability at the level! I climbed them without problems into a sandy mountain of 45-50 degrees and in rainy weather into the same mountain covered with black earth and grass. In general rowing with a bang! Checked several times for hydroplaning. At a speed of 90-100 km / h, I was quietly driving along a decent channel with water…

Pros
  • Quality. Strong. Not noisy. Passable. Soft
Cons
  • No

This is my second set of these tires. Prior to that, I went to 215 / 65R16 with a load index of 98 (regular requirements). I decided to replace it with the same ones, but they are not produced with the same index, only 102. I asked the representative office a question, they recommended me to take the 102nd index and not worry, the tire weight is the same 11.2 kg. But in fact, tires with an index of 102 are noticeably stiffer and noisier than the 98th index. Apparently the rubber is more…

Pros
  • Managed super, very accurate steering. Holds the trajectory well, does not feel the track. Thanks to the asymmetric pattern and structure. Holds the road normally, worse than highways, but with heavy braking it slows down well, it feels like it swims up in corners, especially in the heat. The cross-country ability is satisfactory, it’s the most for country roads, but you don’t need to go into serious dirt - it’s understandable, this is an under-AT tire, essentially a highway tire, but with the ability to drive on weak off-road. It’s very frustrating how the tire rides on bad asphalt at speed. In fact, I would recommend (if it were not for weak wear resistance) for long-distance travel. On intercity roads, you can go very quickly and not pay attention to potholes.
Cons
  • Floats in the heat, treadwear = 320 - a rather low value, when used on asphalt, it is confirmed, it wears off noticeably. But the softness of the rubber, on the other hand, allows you to smooth out the noise from the asphalt.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

I use 235/60 R16 on Toyota RAV4. Mostly exploitation in the city, but forays into nature happen. Rubber is really not noisy - in RAVs, the Shumka, frankly, is not up to par. With it, you can absolutely calmly drive 130-140 km / h and not even raise your voice. To be honest, I didn’t really like it from the photos on the Internet. But in reality, the car looks very good, even more than. Adds some brutality or something off-road. It holds water perfectly - crossing the water-filled track on the

Pros
  • Quiet, perfectly holds both dry asphalt and a track filled with water. M + S - what you need to feel confident on a muddy road, and calmly ride through the porridge from the first snow, waiting for the end of the "tire fever".
Cons
  • Didn't find it in one season.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

Chose a long time from a large number of manufacturers and models. I stopped at Michelin Latitude Cross 215/65 R16 102H for the KIA SPORTAGE crossover. As long as everything suits. I recommend it even though it's pricey.

Took in the spring of 2022 (made in 2022) on a SantaFe New Disel typewriter. I immediately knew that it would be noisy on the pavement, and so it turned out. Meryl sound level meter: somewhere in the region of 72 dB as in the passport. This is the only "disadvantage", if of course it can be called that, because if you want off-road tires, this is an inevitability, and you have to face it. This is what I expected, so I do not consider it a disadvantage. I liked the rubber, on the pavement the…

Pros
  • Good handling on any road
Cons
  • noisy!?

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Product satisfying the quality of the product, good price.

I recommend it for purchase, if the price does not scare you away, subject to operation in the SUMMER period when driving 70 percent city and 30 percent light "off-road". PS I have a 2022 Suzuki Grand Vitara car, permanent four-wheel drive, pressure 2.1bar. Tire size 225/65 R17 102H. Specifications may differ for other parameters! Everything is relative, nothing is perfect. Think for yourself, happy shopping.

Pros
  • ABRASION RESISTANCE, small lateral lugs, dual tread pattern (inner half road, outer half off road), good wet and dry handling, good rim fit and balance
Cons
  • PRICE, "noisy" due to its rigidity, quickly "washed out" on the road, due to the specific tread pattern, small objects (pebbles, glass, etc.) are clogged into it and fly out into other cars and objects on the go, pure summer tires (DO NOT rush to change shoes from winter to summer until the temperature at night is CONSTANTLY positive)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing special, there are positive and negative sides.

Obviously a little expensive for its qualities, although I do not regret buying it, because. the comfort outweighs the cons. But I won't buy it next time. Different pros: Comfortable - perfectly fulfills medium and large pits, it goes softer on the washboard. It rows well on light off-road and wet grass, better than expected on sand, as expected quickly washed out on clay. It slows down very well - I had to slow down from a hundred to zero on the track, I stood up, as if rooted to the spot…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

I chose tires for the summer for a very long time and settled on Michelin Latitude Cross 215-65/16. The first time I drove and was stunned: as if all the roads were asphalted. On fine dirt it drags normally. The ribs on the sidewall, as it were, do not allow much splashing of the car. Maybe this is my subjective opinion, but the car has become less dirty on a damp road. In general, who needs a comfortable ride - take it, you will not regret it.

Pros
  • Very comfortable tires. Well thought out protector. Virtually silent. Gravel and small stones are not clogged at all. Always clean tread. Holds the road confidently.
Cons
  • Haven't revealed yet.

I've been running tires for 3 years without taking them off. Auto Kia Sorento diesel 4wd. Very pleased with the rubber. Much has been said before me. What can I add: Speed. It was not possible to accelerate more than 170. Holds well. Off-road. As far as my car allows, I drove in and out without problems. Despite the fact that the mud really sticks to the wheels, the car still drives in the mud to the very bottom, and this helped a lot a couple of times. Winter. It so happened that he was…

Pros
  • Stability, quiet, perfectly behaves on asphalt, grader, light off-road, even in winter! Wear resistant.
Cons
  • The tire is declared as "all-weather", according to European standards. Exactly what in European) The price tag is not cheap, but in its price and quality category, it seems to me, the best - similar continental and nokian are more expensive.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Think carefully before you buy this product

Prado 150 (265\60 R18) drove more than 500 km, ran in so to speak: - at a pressure of 2.0 - 2.1, the car is very comfortable, this cannot be taken away from the bears. The primer, country roads, the city with holes after the winter - everything is soft and like on a yacht . But the track and the track are terrible, the car walks, you drive like a loaf from lane to lane, constantly taxiing, the steering wheel pulls somewhere to the side. There is no exact zero from the word at all ! It helped a…

Pros
  • Softness, Comfort
Cons
  • There is no exact control He does not like Kolya very much, There is no clear zero, it always pulls somewhere along the highway.

I put it on a Subaru Forester, skated for almost two seasons. In general, I am satisfied, but I took it next time, I don’t know. Has pros: Ideal for moderate off-road, fishing, to the countryside - no problem. Strong sidewall resistant to side cuts. Holds the road well, resistant to hydroplaning. Durable, more than once ran into pits and potholes at speed - not a single cut and hernia in two years. Pretty wear resistant. Got cons: - noisy, after 90 km / h it starts to buzz, for the winter I put