Review on Nokian Tires Nordman 7 205/55 R16 94T winter by Stanislaw Mielicki ᠌

shock, considering the astronomical price for the ordinary size; a decisive strike against the manufacturer; I will never buy this brand again; I will never recommend it to anybody; I have always purchased this brand; however, I have since switched to Italy; on another automobile, there is no comparison with this manufacturer; a clear advantage. Its benefits: in my opinion, there are none, with the exception of its directional stability; nonetheless, the vehicle is not a crossover for maniacs, and that is why I have reviews on other types of rubber. Cons: there are a lot of them, and even though I've been a fan of this brand, Nokian, for more than 14 years, certain tires are a huge letdown, so in order to get my money's worth, I'd recommend looking elsewhere. 1. The noise from the wild stopped after 6,000 to 7,000 kilometers; perhaps they had become accustomed to it. 2. severe wear during the first winter, roughly 7,000 to 8,000 kilometers; the mileage has already depleted 6 millimeters of tread (one tire of this brand has traveled 70,000 kilometers and worn down to 4 millimeters). 3. no patency in deep and loose snow, but what's the snow, if there is at least some kind of ice, it grinds and there's no shock going, as a result, I got stuck this winter 15 times, with a clearance of 200mm, an adequate carrier, etc. in viburnum with a gun for 5 years I got stuck only once, but here in empty places it happens all the time. 4. does not like snow edges when rebuilding because it makes the process more time consuming and difficult. 5. grinds constantly when starting from a location, also known as slipping in place and shaking from side to side.