Review on City backpack POLAR П1955, black by Adam Kowalski ᠌

superior than all others. a situation when you want to give a 6 out of 5! daily use for nine years! I'm now debating purchasing a new one. I'll alter things up and bring a Polar P1956 (exactly the same backpack, only a little bit different in style). This backpack will also serve as a fallback for "dirty" excursions (to caverns, abandoned sites, etc.). has benefits - Convenience (two zippers, shoulder straps, and back) - Durability (the majority of backpacks made by considerably more well-known and popular businesses disintegrate within two years). At worst, this one will endure five years.) - Capacity (the best option for the city is 27 liters). - Practicality (several interior pockets and compartments for little goods). - Design (there are a few additional models with comparable features). - Reasonable cost (in comparison to analogs). Pros below: - I run see people with the identical backpacks on the street a few times a month. Perhaps the fact that the backpack won't be distinctive is crucial to someone. In this situation, I suggest that you choose a model other than black, such as red, as there will be a far smaller number of matches. - No versions with bindings for skates, snowboards, or skis - The plastic belt carabiner broke after 5 years of use (my fault; they went through it a few times), two small holes were rubbed at the bottom of the main compartment after 8 years, and the main compartment zipper failed after 9 years. For me, none of this matters because. Especially given that the item is used daily, it is simple to remove (you can always sew, sew in a new zipper, or purchase a new carabiner)!