Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 115
  • 5
    86
  • 4
    20
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

After getting my hands on a Canon 5D Mark 2, I had some major second thoughts about going through with the purchase. After reading a few reviews on the internet, I began to have my suspicions raised about the subject. People have the misconception that fifty percent of the reviews were written by people who have never held a camera in their hands or that the reviews were written to order with the intention of participating in purposeful slander; nevertheless, this is not the subject that is…

Pros
  • Autofocus, a small and compact body, the ability to use SD cards, a low weight, a low power consumption, and a matrix
Cons
  • 1 space for inserting a flash disk, and a display.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good, the price is acceptable.

Most of the frame is not covered by the focal points. It would be more convenient to switch between autofocus points with a joystick than without one. I truly miss the autofocus system on the 7D. Even at the lowest ISO, 1/4000 shutter speed might not be sufficient if you are shooting outside on a sunny day while wide open. If you don't shoot in backlight, I always have the white balance set on the camera and usually always get the right color reproduction. I've had a camera for two years, and I

Pros
  • Size, high working ISO, long battery life, and comfort. Fire frequency.
Cons
  • For me, the auto focus system is the main flaw. There are just 9 focus points and 1 cross. Zone focusing is not present.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

Long debate on whether to purchase. But I made the decision to completely replace my Nikon D7000 with this camera. Of course, I also purchased lenses. As I gain experience in photography, I become more and more aware of how much the image quality has improved, proving the camera's value. The secret to getting nice shots is a current, albeit not top-end FF with good optics. I was concerned that the camera's reduction might restrict me. That didn't happen, though. Highly advised if you are not a…

Pros
  • - Work of automation; - Working ISO up to 3200–5000 depending on lighting; - Image quality (colors) All the benefits of a full frame, including the quality and character of the pictures, convenient management, the option to utilize Canon optics on FF for that type of money, and a light, gripping central AF point
Cons
  • Nothing wrong, but: - displays made of cheap plastic rather than glass flash sync speed of 1/180s is occasionally insufficient, and there is a very narrow range of AF points as well as a significant decrease in their overall number. - I would prefer 26-30 megapixels for current tasks.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

In summary, a strong full frame with a beautiful picture! Iso can be increased to 6400 without risk. Mark3 in its purest form is possible to say. The autofocus was very resolute on the focal point, however I did not like where the controls were placed. Shutter speeds of 1/4000 are ridiculously slow. We don't see any need to, to be honest. a number of occasions I got into tricky positions with fast lenses in good light. Maybe this feature may be really helpful for someone; I had a WG version but

Pros
  • autofocus, battery, frame, wifi, and gps
Cons
  • Exposure: 1/4000, as though taken by a novice photographer - Directed by Gouno

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I shot on crop for a very long time; I began with 1100 d, then 550 d, then 60 d, 70 d, and 7 d. It just so happened that I had one camera, the institute had another, and the editorial office, where I worked as a correspondent, had the third camera. And crops may be found everywhere. So I made the decision to bring a better camera for weddings than my 60 d, which I was using at the time. The only models available in a crisis were, of course, those up to 100,000, which are the 7D mark 2 and 6D…

Pros
  • Excellent though it may not be for serious work. That's it if it's for the studio.
Cons
  • 1. Low continuous shooting made it easier to capture various moments; it seemed 4 against 6 and not a fig when using the same 60 d or 70 d. It is obvious that a quick shooting speed is only necessary 3-5 times during a wedding, but you still need it. autofocus 2. After getting acclimated to the fact that all points hit the target equally well at 70 d and 7 d, you must restrict yourself to the centre point here, which is crop after using autofocus to focus. Because of habit, I knew how I wanted to take a picture even before I looked at the circumstance, and even before I brought the camera, I picked a point in the location I needed. 3 slots for memory cards.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

rating of 5 solely for the standards he satisfies in order to support himself; for those who appreciate reading, I will now add a TON of truth. I purchased a replacement since I had endured persistent harassment on the internet, in discussion forums, and other online communities (700D + 18-135stm). I initially intended to get six-dimensional plus two glasses right away, but I was unable to decide between them, so I settled with the three-month plan instead. My favorite photographic themes…

Pros
  • + ISO (any Canon 600D, 650D, 700D, 60D, or 70D, in addition to the 6D - these cameras produce a very small amount of noise even at 100 iso, which is really corrected in the editors. Nonetheless, colors on large ISOs are not lost, and raw files are handled a little bit more quickly, starting at 1600 ISO and continuing all the way up to 6400 ISO (the limit of the 6D flagship). Everything they mention about the 6D's high ISO performance is generally accurate! + Entire frame, and to be more precise - depth of field (DOF) - it's really wonderful for portraits and for situations when you only want to spotlight something =) + Colors, color reproduction is plainly 5–10% better than the 700d, and the higher the ISO, the more evident this difference becomes. + Compared to crop cameras, the handle is more pleasant to hold (more) + REVIEW IN THE VIDEO FINDER + ONE OF THE LIGHTEST FULL-FRAME CAMERAS + FUNCTIONS IN THE MENU - AUTO FOCUS CORRECTION, SETTING THE MINIMUM SHUTTER SPEED IN APERTURE PRIORITY MODE, DETAILED BATTERY INDICATOR (AS A PERCENTAGE FROM 1% TO 100% - YOU WILL ALWAYS KNOW) + ONE OF THE LIGHTEST FULL-FR
Cons
  • - the Canon 5Dm3's lack of additional chips, in addition to the fact that it currently costs from 80,000 rubles plus glass;

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the level, I am satisfied with everything.

This camera is a significant upgrade from my previous Canon 550D, and I do not regret making the switch. The picture that you take will look fantastic thanks to the full frame and the expanded color range, and the built-in Wi-Fi module will not only let you transfer photos to your smartphone right away, but it will also let you take complete remote control of the camera. The hand of a lady is the ideal position for the camera. One of the flaws is that the location of the buttons is not very…

Pros
  • Full frame, built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, and excellent noise reduction at high ISO settings
Cons
  • Positioning of the various control buttons

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A good quality product, I rate this purchase perfectly.

In addition, there are no errors in what I wrote. Myself, not at all. Several claim that 1/4000 has flaws, including few focus points, only the center is crossed, and that they are generally "bored" of the centre, insufficient dust and moisture protection, etc. As a primarily landscape painter, things are completely unimportant to me and are even DESCRIBED in the qualities. Before purchasing the device, you didn't read the features? This seems odd. What are you reading if you are? When you read

Pros
  • higher working ISO (3200 is generally easy, 6400 - if you suppress it adequately later, but for a home album at least 12800) - lightweight camera body made of magnesium alloy (except top) Canon 60D, nearly the same controls with a quiet, pleasing sound from the mirror and shutter, and basic dust and moisture protection.
Cons
  • There is no such thing for me.

The gadget works well, and as I also use 5d3, I can't comment as a THEORETICAL. 5d3, 5d4, 1dx, and 1dx2 have everything you need in this Superb Amateur equipment. Although I personally would prefer at least nine cross-focus sensors, this is not the most important factor. It is REQUIRED that you read the reviews before making a purchase, or at the very least, read the description on the manufacturer's website. This will prevent any unnecessary disappointments and complaints about fictitious…

Pros
  • The case is well-built, the menu is practical, the sensor is good, and the stretchy RAVs. The autofocus is quick, and the ergonomics are good.
Cons
  • Cross focus point one.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

When upgrading from the EOS 60D, you won't miss a beat thanks to the seamless integration of nearly all of the 60D's most important features and the streamlined process by which you may switch between photo and video capture. There is a lot of literature extolling its virtues. Hence, I see no reason to restate myself. I can declare with certainty that its technical capabilities extend beyond those of the crop. Given the price differential between the 5D Mark3 and this lens, it's a win for the…

Pros
  • FF, Wi-Fi, GPS, internally adjustable lens, and cost
Cons
  • a negligible amount

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfied with the product, I recommend it to everyone.

I'm not a pro. I bought the camera because I like to shoot indoors without a flash. Previously, there was a Canon EOS 550D + Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM. I did not have enough sensitivity of the matrix and aperture of the lens in the room for shooting children. Now I shoot with Canon EOS 6D + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. The difference is obvious: the shutter speed can be made shorter, the ISO is automatically expanded to working 6400. The rest I process in lightroom, which, by the way, had to…

Pros
  • Full frame, weight, battery, WI-FI.
Cons
  • One full focus point.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

This camera is my primary camera, and I took it with me on a bicycle vacation to Iceland in the summertime, when it rained heavily the entire time. Even though there is opportunity for further development, the camera lives up to my expectations in almost every way. Auto-ISO with indication in the viewfinder, an enhanced UI, more comfortable and logical control, and a large number of settings are only some of the ways that working with the camera in reportage mode has been significantly…

Pros
  • Full frame (with all the subsequent benefits) at a price that is acceptable, good autofocus performance in the dark, the camera is quite compact and light, minimal image noise, silent shutter action, high ease of use in comparison to older cameras, moisture protection.
Cons
  • The user interface and controls have a few minor faults, the RAW files are excessively huge with only a marginal improvement in quality, and the mRAW format has a low quality.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

My impression of the purchase is good, buy it.

There is no built-in autofocus backlight (but he doesn’t really need it) AF is already good. (resolved by using an external radio transceiver for flash with laser illumination) the shutter button is not very clear compared to the nikon d90 (long stroke, falls deep) Autofocus is slow for moving subjects. Everyone writes that the battery is long-lasting, for some reason I only have 500-700 shots, until I understand what the reason is.

Pros
  • Full frame. Very high quality picture, even at high iso (up to 12022) Realistic colors Good noise reduction system, with serial mode. Large viewfinder Fast, accurate autofocus (on L-series lenses) that is focused even in very poor lighting conditions. Pleasant shutter sound) + add. low-noise mode, almost silent. Comfortably lies in the hand. There is kind of like moisture protection, but I haven’t tested it in practice) (scary) Flash control through the camera menu. Quality video. Lots of different settings. Remembers the shutter speed and aperture value in all modes: S, A and M are very convenient compared to the nikon d90 (this was not there) Adequate price.
Cons
  • Poorly organized menu with fuzzy page indications. The current white balance setting is not displayed on the top screen. In addition, there is no BW quick adjustment button. There are assignable buttons, but the set of functions on them is limited and BW is not included in it. Illogical view mode. There are, as it were, two of them: one immediately after the shooting is limited to viewing only the last picture, you cannot go to the others in it, and the second is extended, i. E. full-fledged, but for this you need to enter the view again. Enlargement and reduction of the picture: first you need to press the magnifier button and then turn the top wheel - not quickly and requires effort. (Buttons on the 60D were more convenient) No reticle in viewfinder. There is no built-in remote control function for external flash (it would be better if it was instead of GPS and WIFI) No hot shoe plug included (nikon has one) The screen cover is plastic. (Solved by purchasing a protective glass)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

I don't do videos, so this review is relevant only for part of the photo. Before 6D, I used Nikon D800 for some time in conjunction with 24-70 2.8, and also had Sony A-700 and Nikon D300S for a long time. Different pros: - Very grippy central focus point, working at -3 EV - Weight, it's really light (770 grams with battery) - Good grip considering the weight - Dust / moisture protection level 5D MK III - Really working (with further processing) ISO up to 12800 - Convenient menu, controls…

The pro camera is not very interesting, it is too expensive for beginners. It seems like a budget FF, but it does not cost budget. Like FF, but the pictures are somehow not sharp, apparently due to the abundant noise reduction. Controversial camera. It makes sense to buy when the price is around 50 Pros: Full frame. Excellent quality at high ISO. The presence of Wi-Fi and GPS (they will be useful to someone). Comfortable grip, optimal size Its cons: - 1/4000 - lack of built-in flash when a…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Impressions from the purchase are good, buy.

So, a run of 1000 frames with a Canon 50mm 1.8 STM fix. Behind a few photo sessions and a trip out of town. It's time to share your thoughts on the Canon 6d's 1,000-frame run. I list the advantages and disadvantages. Please share, who also, who does not. Thank you for your attention. Pros: - iso 6400 almost working - the battery holds 850 frames in RAW format on a full manual - the picture is plastic and has a high level of detail in comparison with the crop - the camera is quite light…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

Great device for your money. It gives an order of magnitude more detailed picture than the 5D mark II when it comes to video. I bought it for myself for video shooting. Excellent values ​​of working iso - really use in work up to 6400. I didn’t even install the ML firmware on purpose, because I read about the problem of creating some DAT files. As a result, on native firmware, when shooting video, the device does not stop recording when the file reaches 4 GB, as did earlier models (5D II…

Pros
  • Full frame, low noise, wi-fi
Cons
  • Design or software flaws, more details in the comments. Shutter speed 1\4000

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I’ve been taking pictures for a little over a year, I don’t know how professionals shoot, but I shoot in equal and as some write that there is no quick access to bb guys why? It works in Lightroom with no problems. set the shutter speed limit so that there is no blur, auto ISO and forget about the settings - the camera will do everything by itself - you will have the most responsible thing - to build a competent composition in the frame - and this is already a camera that has nothing to do with

Pros
  • ff, iso, weight, price, battery charge, screen, ergonomics
Cons
  • focus points are close to the center