Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 54
  • 5
    34
  • 4
    15
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

For me, the device is clearly with a margin of quality and capabilities. Just touching are such shortcomings "revealed" in some reviews as a body not made of magnesium alloy and a lower rate of fire compared to the Canon 50. Firstly, there is also a carcass on a metal frame and, if it does not hammer nails in an acidic environment, it is quite durable. Secondly, in real life, the difference in speed is as important as the difference in throttle response between 5.6 and 6.3 seconds for cars…

Pros
  • I switched to Canon from Sony Alpha so I will compare with it: - sits very comfortably in the hand, it is larger and more grippy. The tactile sensations are very pleasant. A lot more settings. Sony's menu is no worse, but here everything is clear and logical. The viewfinder is larger and brighter. Focus with the 18-135 lens is just great: fast and clear. ISO working up to 3200 inclusive. High-definition swivel screen, which, by the way, can simply be rotated inward for protection. The second LCD display on top is convenient for tripod operation. An excellent 18-135 lens in both quality and coverage. Realistically, I only need something fast for filming in the dark. Very good software for working with pictures. This is important to me because I'm not friends with Photoshop. The picture is excellent on first impressions, but here I still need to gain experience - I’m shooting for a couple of weeks.
Cons
  • Oddly enough, the choice of lenses is less than that of Sony, there are just a huge number of inexpensive and decent options from Minolta. Our price is overstated by 15% compared to the well-known catalog.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

I thought that after half a year of use, the enthusiasm would subside and I would find something to complain about . But no . everything is the same - it is magnificent! Very comfortable grip! The external display is a great helper in saving battery. The battery is good, enough for 2-3 intensive shootings. All buttons-joysticks-wheels are thought out very well. a day later, all settings in manual mode - by touch, without looking up from the eye) Pretty fast-paced. The only thing you can…

Pros
  • - photo quality - ERGONOMICS! - battery - external display
Cons
  • - could not find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

When choosing a camera, I chose between Canon 60D and Nikon 7000. According to all the reviews, including the review on the well-known site, the choice indicated Nikon 7000, in fact, I intended to buy it, but . A friend (works as a salesman in an electronics store) gave the ability to calmly test both cameras, since the card for both cameras is the same. And here a “but” opened up . 1. Nikon didn’t lie down at all in his hand, the feeling was that he was about to fall out, and Canon sat down…

Pros
  • Quite compact, not too heavy (I know that weight can affect blurring, but still I consider the lightness of the camera a plus), fast autofocus, capacious battery, swivel display, excellent LCD resolution (you can really appreciate the quality of the photo taken), reasonable price, rate of fire, working ISO up to 3200 (in my opinion), I haven’t noticed the front-back focus with my lenses, including Soviet ones, the availability of Canon accessories or their analogues.
Cons
  • 1. Removal when rotating the LCD monitor to the side; 2. The mirror claps quite loudly; 3. There are problems with the BB with incandescent lamps; 4. Not convenient on / off; 5. The cover of the memory card creaks; 6. Slow focusing in Life View mode

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied with everything, the product corresponds to the description.

Before that, I used 400 for several years, so all my impressions are based on comparison with this model. As it often happens, after taking some pictures and looking at the pictures, I wanted to be upset, but comparing the pictures with the old camera (four hundred) helped. 18 megapixels really give much more detail than 10 megapixel four hundred. I shoot, of course, in Rav, and after shooting shortly after the purchase at ISO 320, when I saw the noise, I even began to doubt if I got some…

Pros
  • At high ISOs, less than four hundred is noisy, see examples, even at ISO 6400 you get something different from random colored spots. But in real life, you can still lift ISO above 800 only reluctantly. In fact, I try not to raise even above 250. Huge battery capacity. With one charge, I shot 500 pictures + video, and then the indicator moved away from the maximum by only one division. Video. I don't know much about video shooting. But it is enough to press a couple of buttons, as the camera does everything by itself and it turns out quite a decent video, even at night, with a minimum of light. Swivel screen. I have already appreciated the convenience when you need to shoot something from an unusual angle. But if you want really high quality pictures, I would not use live view, in this mode the matrix heats up and starts to make even more noise. The high speed of continuous shooting, in comparison with the four hundred, is a real machine gun. Wealth, compared with the same four hundred settings. More convenient management. High, for crop, resolution.
Cons
  • I want to have an ISO with no noise. And here they are even at ISO 100. I don’t know how the competitors are doing, maybe I’m too picky, but shooting under ideal lighting conditions, in a studio for example, I want to get all the smallest details so that every eyelash, every hair is visible, with a full-length portrait, this is no longer so easy, partly because you still have to crush noises, and details are crushed along with them. Why is there no ISO 50 if the matrix still makes noise at ISO 100?

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied with everything, both price and quality, I advise you to buy.

in my opinion, the swivel screen is not a very convenient thing, because it is rarely needed, and you need to turn it all the time (this is probably my quirk - always close the screen when the camera is not in use). Auto focus is quite tenacious as long as it's light, but in a nightclub it can be a bit dark, which makes it difficult to focus. In my opinion, in most cases (compared to crop cameras) the camera is excellent, the 7D is a bit more comfortable in terms of ergonomics and moisture…

Pros
  • rate of fire, relatively high ISO, convenient buttons, assembly.
Cons
  • swivel screen, no compac flash, it is not possible to change the focus point during shooting.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

I'll write briefly. Like many, I jumped to 60 from 400. The difference is, of course, obvious. As the character of one movie said: weight is good! weight is reliable! ) The weight is just such that the camera would sit perfectly in the hand and at the same time it would not be a shame to carry the camera with you every day) Focusing is fast and in most cases accurate (of course, it also depends on the lens), there are no problems with side points on fast lenses. iso working up to 1600-3200…

Pros
  • Grip, weight, excellent screen, scroll wheel, remote iso, drive, etc., very decent battery, full video control, good focus and rate of fire for an amateur level, the possibility of alternative firmware. Cool shutter sound
Cons
  • Mode dial. Namely, the lock button (no one needs it at all) and the video mode in the far corner. Not a very convenient switch. Almost immediately, the rubber pad under the thumb began to peel off.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

This is a rather mysterious camera, when I bought it a couple of months ago, for the first five days I went crazy, practically because of everything: the quality did not suit me, the ergonomics also infuriated me, in short, I was not happy with the whole camera, but I took him in order to develop and continue to engage in photography . After all the psychos left the hopelessness, I took the instructions again (yes, it’s better to read absolutely everything). After reading, I looked at the…

Pros
  • The quality of the resulting image (I thought the swivel screen was a dummy, but as it turned out, a very useful thing). A very bright screen, but as mentioned earlier, it does not embellish reality much :) nice design, so nice that it took me a couple of days to make the camera feel like home. I am also very pleased with the speed of work, it turns on in a split second, always, if you need to take a photo quickly, you will have it, as quickly as you need.
Cons
  • Weird, I don't usually listen to pessimists like those who complain about button placement etc. But now they turned out to be right, the button to protect against accidental clicks is not convenient.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

This is not a review, but a comparison with another, older model. For several years I shot on a 350-ku. Got 60. What immediately caught my eye 1. The body is larger, the grip is more comfortable 2. Shutter operation is quieter 3. Ability to select the focus point with one click (you only need to change the basic settings). I don't use automatic selection 99% of the time, and it took time to switch the point. In a dynamic report, it greatly interferes. The problem has now been removed. 4…

Pros
  • Flexibility in custom function settings Swivel screen Movie mode (see comments)
Cons
  • Extremely slow focusing speed when shooting through the flip screen

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not worth the money, I will not advise this product.

We chose between Canon 60D and Nikon D7000. Both cameras are very good and worth each other. However, when we tested it in the store (both with 18-55 kit lenses), it turned out that while we were shooting walls, views and other still lifes, the quality was equally excellent both there and there. But when they started to shoot people and portraits, it turned out that with the same light, angle and shooting mode, the simpotism of the muzzle of the face is completely different :) Ie. look in the…

Pros
  • Excellent ergonomics, sat in the hand like a glove, conveniently placed buttons on the carcass; Swivel screen.
Cons
  • image quality

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is top notch and I recommend the product for purchase.

When switching from Canon 1000D, I chose between 50D and 60D. So: 50D has been tested for years (body, matrix, fine tuning for lenses), while 60D has a swivel screen, wireless control of external flashes, video recording, the latter became decisive for me, and 60D won. Now impressions: 1. I have an official guarantee , manufacturer Japan, and as a result - all lenses became like native ones, i. E. no back, front focus; 2. Due to all the cross-shaped points, and the central one at f / 2.8, the…

Pros
  • All focus points are cross-shaped with a central point for aperture of 2.8 or more, the ability to wirelessly work with external flashes (no need to constantly think about synchronizers and batteries), video recording, working ISO up to 3200, weight (in order to rest your hands - use the "regular or shoulder strap)
Cons
  • It is problematic to quickly switch to video recording and back, especially when shooting reportage and wedding shooting (I use video for linking in a slideshow)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

In general, the camera is very good, canon turned out to be such a good copy for quite reasonable money (if you don’t buy it in 2022). But the reasonableness of the price was achieved due to not the most successful reduction in the cost of the design (instead of magnesium plastic, poor quality rubber in the "grip" area tends to peel off), this can cause the user not the best experience. Again, cutting out the stabilizer from the carcass itself is also a way to simplify the design of the camera…

Pros
  • photo quality, Ergonomics (thoughtfulness and availability of all settings at hand), The battery lasts for 2022+ shots, Monochrome screen with backlight. Rotary screen? (I put the question because for me it is not a plus, I rarely use it at all)
Cons
  • Body materials (older versions of e made me feel more positive), Lack of proximity sensor (does not turn off the same rotary screen - for this reason I rarely use it), Button lock on the mode wheel, built-in flash The absence of a stub in the carcass itself,

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

I still don’t know how the 600 differs from the 60, but I can compare it with the 400 and 550, the built-in puff works faster (on the 400 and 550 it puffs every 3-4 seconds, then once in one second), in general, the camera is more thoughtful in terms of ergonomics, more settings. I am an ordinary amateur photographer and therefore I cannot say everything in detail until the end. I have not yet studied the photo. But the main effect on the face - high-quality pictures appear more often. Despite…

Pros
  • Compare with 400D: 1) in the hand like a glove. compared with the 600th, D90, D7100, A65. 2) ease of management - I'm probably already a canonical canonist. on the buttons for me personally, everything is as it should be, I really liked the ease of operation. Despite the fact that many swear, the difference between it compared to the 50th. I had a 400D before, and before it an SX20, so in the first minutes I automatically tried to do some things like on a 400, and then I tasted all the convenience of two wheels, like on an SX20, my muscle memory remembered and the very next day I set up many options faster than on the 400-ke. 3) The electronic horizon is a curiosity)! helps to use pixels more efficiently. 4) An additional screen on top helps)) sometimes I don’t even open the swivel lens. 5) works better with MIR than 400, 6) works better with high ISO. 7) The card is normal, not CF, which means if I run out of it on the way, then I can insert my 2 and 16 GB from the phones through the adapter. 8) The shutter is quieter, there is no this automatic clang.
Cons
  • I haven’t seen any shortcomings yet, I would like to adjust the lens . but to be honest, after the 400th, I simply have nothing to complain about. We'll complain about the rotary display - a curiosity) on the SX20 I don’t remember a case that came in handy except for photos from the floor.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

The 400D wins in terms of picture not so much, but in terms of ergonomics - a huge step forward (two wheels, an upper display, direct parameter control buttons), so for me this is a new level. As far as I can understand regarding modern *00D models, there is no difference at all in the picture, but for me, in any case, ergonomics and ease of control would be the decisive argument when buying, because in many respects this is what determines the pleasure of working with the camera. The next…

Pros
  • I switched from 400D for objective reasons, namely I wanted to (basic): - Two control dials; - Larger and brighter viewfinder; - Larger ISO range; - Top display with shooting options. All this, unlike the 400D, is available in the 60D. Two control wheels - very convenient and not only in M ​​mode. The top display is also a very useful and convenient thing. The matrix quite masters ISO up to 2 thousand. Moreover, I’ll also write down the advantages - good video recording (in the days of the 400D I didn’t even think about video .), Q-menu (there wasn’t such a thing on the 400D, but later it appeared - an exceptionally convenient thing), wireless flash control (for me Speedlite 430 EX).
Cons
  • - Not a full frame sensor, lol; - Indeed, very demanding on lenses (aperture and sharpness); - The display, its mother, strongly distorts the picture; - Selecting an AF point requires pressing a button (but then there are already 4 options to choose from - rotation of any of the wheels, navipad, or the center button - to select the center point); - Not ideal ergonomics for video shooting.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product

I bought this camera for astrophotography, but I also took some shots with the auto focus function of this camera and found it was a bit difficult to do , but as soon as Focus everything else was great.

Pros
  • 18MP APS-C CMOS sensor
Cons
  • Big and bulky