I bought the wheels on 02/26/2023. Price at the time of purchase. amazon. 5235. Rub. for the wheel. 205.552022. Production, China. Date of manufacture 2022. 3 years ago I already bought such tires Hancock Vertus Prime, 3. Only made in Hungary, they passed without problems. 80000 km. Soft, strong, wear-resistant, was satisfied. That's why I took it. Only 3 years ago the price was higher by 500 per tire. Taking into account inflation, I was surprised that the price is lower, I think this is due…

I took this rubber because of the "low" noise (according to reviews). In the end, in general, satisfied. I would not say that the noise level is very low, most importantly, this noise / sound does not bother at all, at any speed, even on coarse-grained asphalt. Before that, there were Bridgestone Dueler H / P Sport 215 / 65R16 - this is really noisy and hard rubber (it’s awesomely strong), but the noise was unbearable, I’m very glad that I finally changed it. Machine - what 2022 j10.

It's time to replace the old tires with new ones. Auto Daewoo Gentra. According to the book, 195/55 p15 is written, which actually stood. The tires were Continental ContiPremiumContact2. I was afraid that this one would not fit, but after studying auto forums I decided to buy this size, and this particular brand for durability. And yes, everything is ok, nothing rubs anywhere, the car drives gently at 195/65 rather than at 195/55x, as if it has become higher, and quiet tires, and the…

I took tires in size 215/50 r16 for Ford Focus 3. I compare it with michelin primacy 3 and energy saver and the comparison is for the better. At first, there were no complaints about the Michelins primacy (I rode them mainly), except for a terrible noise, but after 50 thousand they began to catch a rut, there was more noise and, in general, behavior on the road began to strain. For a very long time I chose rubber for a replacement and eventually settled on a hankook. I was struck by the reduced

Tire size 205/55 R16 91h made in Korea 2022 year of release. For lovers of active and aggressive driving, I think they will not be suitable because of the roll on sharp turns and possibly excessive softness, but for those who move smoothly and calmly (this is just about me) - the option is suitable and will definitely please! This is definitely what I was looking for. Let's see how strong their sidewall is, because our roads leave much to be desired and how tire characteristics will change with

Got pros: Holds the road well, both dry and in the rain, soft, comfortable to move through tram tracks, size 195/55/R15, not noisy. Different cons: Collects stones from the road, and then throws them over the arches and bodywork. After the break-in (traveled 800 km) stopped collecting stones.

Comparing Ventus Prime 3 with MICHELIN Pilot Sport 4 and Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco 2 all in the same size and on the same machine. After watching magazine tests and reading reviews, I took Ventus Prime 3 instead of Michelin, but was disappointed and returned back after a season :) The nature of the car changed, taxiing no longer brought pleasure, with an increase in speed, the ride became uncertain, slipped from dry to puddle, and did not give a margin for emergency braking. In turns, the speed…

Ran 600 km. The tire is excellent, it doesn’t catch a rut, it keeps the road confidently, in the rain the handling is very good (at 100 km / h in a turn without problems). I chose according to two parameters: resistance to hernias and hydroplaning. I did not expect that it is so quiet, compared to the past Michelin Primacy HP, these are just silent. Moreover, noiselessness is revealed on a country road at a speed of > 90 km / h. There is a suspicion that the tire has poor wear resistance…

Rubber on a solid four! In view of the low price category, it deserves more appreciation, but the declared indicators are such that the fact does not meet all expectations. There will be something to add, I will add later) Pros below: After winter tires, fuel consumption dropped. Silence when driving on a normal canvas. On dead roads it goes moderately softly, and does not float, this is at 205 to 55)) I liked it. Price quality. I agree that it’s not the cheapest rubber, but it pulls quite well

In general, if you operate the car only in the city in turtle mode, then you can choose it. And if you like to frolic in the stream sometimes, then this rubber is not for you at all. This rubber 235 / 45r18 was included with the car, so I think there is no doubt in its originality. For myself, I put an end to the company hankook. Before that, I used hakka black tires and for me it is ideal soft, quiet, holds the road very well, accelerates to 235 km / h, and hankook unfortunately behaves…

Previously used Michelin, Nokia, Goodyear products, the winner of tire tests, which left only positive impressions. Maybe it was necessary to ride on domestic and Chinese tires in order to feel the benefits of the Koreans? . or is the hankuk so loud and wooden exactly in 17 inches? Different pros: A high place in the Autoreview test, positive user reviews and a price of about 7 instead of 9 from competitors left no doubt in choosing new summer tires. Handling and economy were top notch. Despite

I chose tires according to reviews of real buyers, I realized that in this price range, this is the best rubber in terms of price / quality / performance ratio. Never ridden a Hankook before, very satisfied. Quiet compared to previous Bridgestone Turanza tyres. Time will tell on wear resistance, but according to reviews everything is fine. Bought in Mosavtoshina.

Look, this is some kind of aquaplaning forum. Is everyone constantly aquaplaning that they write this in the reviews? This is generally a one-time situation. In general, I'm not such a hydroplaning specialist, so I'll just say it (read above). Different pros: Good brand, they make decent wheels in their price range. The previous car also had Hankooks and I changed them to Hankooks. The new one had Continental, but there were certain problems, a hernia got out, but I decided not to overpay and…