Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 203
  • 5
    136
  • 4
    27
  • 3
    10
  • 2
    19
  • 1
    11

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The quality is fine, it's fine to use.

Delving into my usage experience.Has pros: Holds the road well, quiet, durable. Easily balanced. Has some cons: For the second season, she began to poison on the thorns!

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset with this product.

New car tire size 205/55r17 was selected with great attention. Lada Vesta SV's cross model was so impressed by the "market leader" that it chose to forego cost savings and purchase one. Before that, I used to drive a few different vehicles, including a couple of cheap oak ones I bought on the used auto market. Four Hakka were killed, and seven Nordman and one Hakka were born in the car. The MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 is the only tire that reliably grabs an asphalt track on a dry road at +2 to +5…

Pros
  • Charming in appearance Manufacturer's bright claims, and drooling autobloggers
Cons
  • The cost of such power over Gets stuck in a rut, where every turn brings the terrifying fear that you'll skid out of control.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting quality, impossible to use.

Michelin X-Ice North 4 tires are good for 5000 km until the spikes start to waver and lose their effectiveness. The reason why Michael X-Ice North 3 and North 4 happened was because the spikes broke. The sole drawback of this Michelin X-Ice North 2 is its flimsy sidewall, but otherwise everything suited me. They were on my logan, and I was just to my right. I recall that the snow came nicely, and as usual, no one cleared it. As a result, all the cars trudged, and I confidently drove 60…

Pros
  • the first 5000 kilometers were on very rubber.
Cons
  • The spikes are simply not what they should be; they are many but little, and even with little snow, they stop operating. However, the most significant fact is that their regular employment is over after 5000–7000 kilometers. The cord could also be stiffened.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good and quality product, but there are flaws.

The tires are a size 185/65 R15 and a model 9 Lancer. Rational and steady (pensioner) rubber in the form of an automobile. Anchored spikes. Avoided a wreck after stopping suddenly on wet pavement, but was struck in the face by a group trying to catch up with Velcro. I went with the green driver and I don't feel like I lost. What you need to worry less about the two to five meters of stopping distance.

Pros
  • Fair cost, not the lowest but not the highest either. Comparing soundproofing to Velcro, noise levels are within the margin of error. Wet pavement and oatmeal turn into an exciting experience. Draws 1,300 kilograms (3,000 pounds) up an icy hillside just like it was summer.
Cons
  • If you drive too swiftly through steep corners and move the steering wheel too sharply, the excitement will quickly be replaced with the foul scent of pengers. Contrary to the advertisement, the skid's edge is not gradual but rather sharp. Road conditions are unpredictable, therefore it's important to always be prepared for the worst. The worst product I had to roll at t values between 0 and -10 (let's be extra careful) was in the corners.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didnt expect the quality to be so high.

In spite of the fact that it was still feasible to drive with most of the spikes in place, I am already purchasing a replacement set (the first one lasted me four years). I didn't even consider alternatives before purchasing (I travel a lot, so I have anything to compare them to). Even at today's prices, it's still a good deal. There are no such things as comfortable or safe tires.

Pros
  • highest quality rubber available
Cons
  • highest quality rubber available

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Middle-of-the-road winter tires that perform really well. They retain their shape during thawing, are easy to maneuver, and show consistent behavior on ice. Low-temperature features and all-terrain performance were sacrificed in favor of a tougher compound and handling, making these models less suited for use in severe frosts than their predecessors.

Pros
  • Very good winter and off-season performance on both dry and rainy roads. They are only slightly louder than a normal conversation, they handle the road surface excellently (the sidewalls are quite strong even on the 65 profile, the push wheel does not break in corners), and it does not sag at positive temperatures. Unlike the XIN2, changing to winter tires (from summer Michelin PS4s to winter Michelin PS55s with an even higher load index and a very stiff sidewall) does not feel like going from a vehicle to a swamp. On ice, the grip is not as "anchor" as the 8 Hakkapelita, but control is considerably more predictable; skidding does not occur suddenly as the lateral load grows, but the car begins to be somewhat dragged long before the breakdown into a skid. When driving on ice, it seems like you have coarse sandpaper instead of spikes on your tires; this gives you a wonderful sense of control over your vehicle's placement and its holding power.
Cons
  • Because their sidewalls are stiffer than those of the XIN2, they "flatten" less and row less efficiently on soil or a yard covered in snow. It has poor directional stability in "track after a heavy snowfall" circumstances and requires continual taxiing, but it slows down more effectively than XIN2 on rolling snow. The composition of this rubber raises serious concerns about its performance at -40 degrees.

I paid a low amount because it was an absurd price for a novelty, and I was concerned. Though everything went smoothly. The closest pricing for same labeled tires were typically $2102–3000 more expensive each piece. In December 2022, I took a 6500 wheel. stands atop a four-wheel-drive, 17*205-inch Subaru WRX STI. I tested it first on the track, in rallycross, on clear ice, and occasionally with snow on top; it grips well, has a lot of spikes, and behaves predictably. The drawback is that their…

Pros
  • Very balanced rubber with excellent driving traction on all terrain. It is quiet on the pavement, adheres to the ice well, and conducts itself fairly on wet pavement. The snowfall is steady. Very powerful - it flew into a variety of holes, but once it did so into a deep, sharp-edged cutout in the asphalt, and I didn't have time to switch it off. The blow was so powerful that I was concerned for the rubber, but in the end, the front disk ruptured, and the rubber on it is entire. And neither party suffered a back injury. This surprised me because their previous models, according to the reviews, were subpar. Well, the spikes don't shatter anymore!) And everything is set up for the season!
Cons
  • in deep snow (I drove into the forest) floats a little. Snow porridge is also available for 4ku, though I'm not sure what kind of rubber works best with our porridge. Price (excluding my case), even if I believe that the price and quality are comparable.

I highly recommend it. I also bought a Michelin one for summer, I’m enjoying it now. My wife took a winter studless Michelin on Murano (I wrote a detailed review) - also a fairy tale . Got pros: 215/65 R 17, VW Tiguan 2. Behavior on ice, on ice is something in general ! Only a very sharp gas supply reminds you that under you is not asphalt, but the ice is clean and it is winter outside. On rolled snow - the same thing, and it in general (! ) not audible. For the sake of interest, I climbed into

Revainrating 5 out of 5

High-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I'm not an expert! I installed these tires on a Nissan Almera, drove them from the North Caucasus to Hong Kong during a snowstorm and snowstorm. It’s excellent to keep the road on the snow (I repeat, I’m not an expert, but in comparison with what used to be (unfortunately I don’t remember the company) keep the road confidently), I never regretted the money spent ! I think for the next car (I hope) I will take these tires!

Pros
  • Controllability
Cons
  • Don't know

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not worth the money, I will not advise this product.

It is adequate for those who do not partake in steam baths and who do not contemplate the physics involved in the movement of vehicles. Everything is quite worthy in terms of its grip on the ice and its tenacity for holding on. Various advantages: Excellent tires, however they can only be used for quiet, low-speed driving. For those who prefer to ride the waves - comfortable; for those who demand precise controllability - NO; you sit continually on treason; what happens; where is the backside…

I had 195/65/15 tires put on my Ford Focus 2 automobile. Due to the fact that Hong Kong hardly ever experienced winter, we were unable to put it through its paces under realistic winter conditions during our testing. However, there are a multitude of operational testing ranging from -10 to +10 (both on dry and wet roads). After traveling a distance of 1000 kilometers around the city (rolling tires), he continued his journey to Hong Kong and Hong Kong. 11 thousand miles traveled. On dry asphalt,

Pros
  • Maneuverability, a quick stopping distance on ice, and steadiness on dry roads are all important.
Cons
  • Noisy

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Upset and disappointed, product is very bad!

Has pros: Everything is at a very high level in terms of controllability, predictability, noise, cross-country ability, and other operational factors; there are no issues about any of these things; nevertheless, there is one BUT! It eliminates all of the wonderful feelings associated with these tires (read the negative aspects). Having certain negative aspects There are two negative aspects to consider: To begin with and most importantly, the chemical composition of rubber is designed in such a

There is no sensation that the car "holds on to the road" with its claws, as there was when I was driving on Hakka (both 5th and 7th), and at the same time, there is no fear that you will not have enough time to stop or that you will slip into an uncontrollable skid. The nature of driving this "hypershipping" is uncommon for me because of this. At the level of reflexes, there is faith that the rubber will always and everywhere hang on to whatever it is attached to. When there is a fair amount…

Pros
  • The sound is soft, but relatively busy, and it has an odd tone, making it less irritating than it would otherwise be. When compared to the 7th hakkapelita, it unquestionably does not do any worse in terms of general road grip. It performs noticeably better on both ice and slush. The more you drive, the more your instincts will train you to believe that the rubber will not fail you if you drive sensibly. This confidence will grow gradually as you progress through the driving process.
Cons
  • In the beginning, one gets the impression that the rubber "floats" a little bit. At first glance, the nature of the rubber ride that is attached to it seems to be a little bit peculiar.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

No complaints, I recommend to buy.

I purchased it on October 20th, 2022, and mounted it on my Camry (215/55R17) as soon as I got it home. For the first 500 kilometers, I drove it with extreme caution up to 80 kilometers per hour. The temperature has not dropped significantly. minus on the street only at night, and at night I sleep)) I will augment this later with information regarding ice and snowfall. I am currently writing about the things that intrigued me the most prior to making a purchase. There are hardly any genuine…

Pros
  • handling both in dry and wet conditions on roadways while the air temperature is positive
Cons
  • Not yet

I moved to Hong Kong from the Urals. Everyone here is chasing Velcro because there is little snow, and if it falls, then zhependos, or ice is a frequent phenomenon here. Because I work in a taxi, I decided not to risk with such a relief up and down the city with lipoons. I bought the top tires, before that there were cheap tires, and Hakka 8. The difference between the top and bottom tires is noticeable. Since then, I have not saved The natives enjoyed the rubber as well; they were surprised…

Pros
  • Gentle and not very boisterous.
Cons
  • If only the cost were different...

The benefits of it include: It became a delight to ride coasting on full drive uphill from the hill in a straight line, which opened up new horizons. Following the dmv2 bridge, the sidewall appeared to have increased elasticity, yet comfort is still there, and the rubber itself is kind. When you're in the automobile, shaking looks and feels more respectable. As soon as I switched my shoes, it felt like driving on mud tires, but with every kilometer of run this feeling is getting smaller. When…