Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📷 sony e-mount 10-18mm f4 oss wide-angle zoom lens (sel1018), black logo

📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black Review

10

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.3
👓 Lenses

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to 📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black
img 2 attached to 📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black
img 3 attached to 📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black
img 4 attached to 📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black

Details

BrandSony
Lens TypeWide Angle
Compatible MountingsSony E
Camera Lens Description18 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length18 Millimeters

Description of 📷 Sony E-Mount 10-18mm F4 OSS Wide-Angle Zoom Lens (SEL1018), Black

Angle of View (APS-C) - 109 ° – 76 °. Minimum focal length of 10 mm (15 mm in 35 mm-camera equivalency). Minimum Focus Distance : 0.82 ft (0.25 m), Maximum Magnification ratio : 0.1x. Superbly detailed images;Aperture Maximum: f/4 ; Minimum: f/22. 35mm equivalent focal-length (APS-C) : 15-27mm. In-the-box:Hood (ALC-SH123), Lens front cap, Lens rear cap.

Reviews

Global ratings 10
  • 5
    6
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality didn't let me down.

Bought a new Sony 10-18mm f/4 lens (SEL-1018) A strong, in comparison with the whale 16-50, are not so enthusiastic, and compared to the Nikon 16-35mm f / 4G ED AF-S VR Nikkor, however, image degradation at the edges due to the drop in resolution of the SEL-1018 Zaitsev catches well in the presence of bright light sources in the frame or next to it, full-size jpg files at the link:

Pros
  • 1 2 3 4
Cons
  • 1 The presence of glare and re-reflections when shooting in backlight if there is a bright light source in the frame or close to the frame border.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

mm, it perfectly covers the full frame - for example there is a pronounced color shift and vignetting, on the new Sony A7 you need to remove the hood skirt around the rear lens and that' weddings, then when shooting interiors, all 4 versatile, and you can’t find replacements for 12 mm on a full frame for this money,

Pros
  • The most amazing thing is that it works on a full frame from 12 sharp, sane cost, constant aperture throughout the range, light weight, tightly assembled.
Cons
  • Hole 4:0, on a full frame - difficult to fix, colorshift on simple sevens.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturers assurances, high quality.

compared to the 5D Mark II with 16-35 L II, I don’t see any drawbacks, except for the price, but in principle, it' I decided for myself, if I like the Sony SEL-1018 10-18 mm F / 4 OSS, I will set myself the task of purchasing the Zeiss Sony SEL-1670Z Vario-Tessar E 16-70 mm F / 4.0 ZA OSS T as a cardinal replacement for the whale 16-50 in general, this task is set) You can see pictures from this lens in comparison with the Canon 16-35 LII with 5D Mark II, get acquainted with my personal impres

Pros
  • 1 which I expected from him, High aperture ratio (4.0), I would like 2.8, 4 just what, perhaps, just lacks in 16-35 Wider angle than full frame 16-35 6 7 After the buzzing and "hurried" whale, In general, "thing! " A nice, compact little hood that screws onto the lens barrel, Large filter 62 12 much better than on the whale 16-50.
Cons
  • 1 but so - “proboscis”) It leaves by 10 mm, forget to check the corresponding box in the lens profile) 3 LII, it seems to me that there are much more of them) 4 mm. ) I had, as always, to buy a rather expensive protective UV filter HOYA PRO1 Digital UV (0) .

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

good super-wide for the Sony Nex SEL system - with a constant aperture makes it possible to take really spectacular shots at extreme focal lengths if the aperture would be higher and the price would be lower - here is the recipe for the best glass for the user Has some pros really WIDE angle effective image stabilizer good resolution of 24MP on a crop matrix good build quality Its cons: the price is just rubbish new to buy for SUCH a price - well, absolutely nowhere used is still acceptable…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best wide angle lens for Sony a6500, a6300 and a6000!

This lens stays 90% on my Sony a6500. I was concerned that f4.0 would limit indoor low-light photography, but the A6500's excellent response at high ISO mitigates those concerns. For blogging, this is one of the best lenses available. The closest I've found, and maybe a little better if you'll forgive the Lumix G7/G85's terrible autofocus, is the Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8. For Sony shooters, don't think twice; Buy this lens! Blazing fast autofocus, super sharp and light enough to work well with…

Pros
  • Lenses
Cons
  • Ok

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Amazing wide angle lens

Do you like wide angle shots? Do you have an A6000 camera? Then you will definitely want to buy this lens. Since the A6000 is a crop sensor, the "effective" focal length of this lens is 15-24mm. This is achieved by multiplying the focal lengths by a "crop factor" of 1.5. If you've ever fallen in love with wide angles, then you know what kind of "look" you want to achieve. In particular, I want some distortion around the edges of the frame, at least for me. This lens does just that, especially…

Pros
  • Camera lenses
Cons
  • Nothing

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Outstanding workmanship and performance!

I have had this lens for a few months now and have used it several times for landscapes and interiors with great success. Yes, there is evidence of vignetting and barreling in some shots (particularly architectural shots) at the widest setting of 10mm, but this can be remedied by setting the value to around 12mm, depending on the subject. The build quality of this lens, which consists of a metal body, is one of the best in the Sony range. I paired my lens with a B+W Pro XS-Pro Digital Ultra…

Pros
  • Camera and Photo
Cons
  • Neutral

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Excellent lens, if a bit pricey

I like this lens as a versatile wide angle tool for my A6400. It focuses quickly and shows decent sharpness around corners, slightly muted. It feels solid, with a metal panel over a plastic frame. I find the stabilization quite useful as you don't always shoot with a tripod - planes, trains and cars! Stabilization also helps in low-light shots, where a slower shutter speed can be used to lower the ISO. The big downside of this lens is the price. Although the price seems to be around $200, this…

Pros
  • Electronics
Cons
  • Questionable purchase for the elderly

Revainrating 2 out of 5

It is better not to buy it, the product is not what it should be.

Friends! If autofocus is not critical for you and you can and know how to turn the handles - do not take it even with an extra charge ! There are many good lenses from other companies (I won't point fingers). There are third-party lenses with both E-mount and many adapters from other systems. It's not a lens - it's a bunch of disappointment. I regret that I bought it and even more disappointment that there is nothing to replace it with. Why Sony doesn’t release a GOOD wide, albeit for a lot of

Pros
  • Small, the trunk almost does not leave, there is a stub. and autofocus.
Cons
  • At a wide angle, such distortion that it is almost impossible to use video from this lens. Very dark. The price in . is above good and evil of course. I got it much cheaper and I think that I overpaid. I dream of selling, but there is no autofocus replacement (( Sharpness and detail by the way - this is also not his forte. I shoot on it only from absolute hopelessness and only very limited plots.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not suitable for use.

I really need a wide zoom. I pecked at the reviews on this lens. I took it for a test and did not understand why people like it so much. For its cost, it has simply disgusting optical qualities. Sharpness is only in the center, at the edges, and even more so the corners without tears you won’t look, terrible soap. What upsets even more is HA, worthy of only the cheapest glasses. Since I switched to Sony from Canon, there has been a continuous problem with optics. Yes, a lot of new models have…

Pros
  • Doesn't look bad
Cons
  • Sharpness only in the center, chromatic aberrations like the cheapest lenses. The price is simply atomic for the result it produces.