Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
🔍 canon eos slr cameras ef 24-105mm f/4 l is usm lens - bulk packaging (white box) logo

🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box) Review

66

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to 🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box)
img 2 attached to 🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box)
img 3 attached to 🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box)
img 4 attached to 🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box)

Details

BrandCanon
Lens TypeStandard
Compatible MountingsCanon EF
Camera Lens Description105 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length105 Millimeters

Description of 🔍 Canon EOS SLR Cameras EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens - Bulk Packaging (White Box)

Product Characteristics

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon EOS SLR Cameras - White Box (Bulk Packaging) is a versatile on-ear headphones that offers a standard zoom range of 24 to 105 millimeters, making it suitable for various photography needs. With its f/4 maximum aperture, this lens allows for excellent depth of field control and low-light performance.

Similar Products

If you're looking for alternatives to the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens, you might consider exploring other on-ear headphones in the market. Some popular options include the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens, the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens, and the Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Lens. These lenses offer similar focal lengths and apertures, catering to different photographers' preferences.

Problems Solved and Important Parameters

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens effectively minimizes chromatic aberration and distortion through its inclusion of 1 Super UD glass element and 3 aspherical lenses. This ensures that your images maintain excellent clarity and sharpness. The lens's ring-type USM system delivers silent autofocus, allowing for quick and precise focusing. Additionally, the full-time manual focus feature provides photographers with the flexibility to make manual adjustments when desired.

Use for Home Comfort

The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens is a valuable addition to any photographer's gear, especially for those who enjoy capturing a wide range of subjects in different environments. Its versatile zoom range and maximum aperture make it suitable for various shooting scenarios, including landscape, portrait, and even close-up photography. Whether you're photographing family gatherings, documenting your travels, or pursuing your creative vision at home, this lens can help you achieve outstanding results.

Here are some examples of where the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Lens can be used:

  • Wedding photography
  • Street photography
  • Nature and wildlife photography
  • Event photography
  • Product photography
  • With its wide range of applications, this lens offers photographers the flexibility and versatility they need to capture stunning images in various settings.

    24 to 105 millimeter standard zoom lens with f/4 maximum aperture for Canon EOS SLR cameras. 1 Super UD glass element and 3 aspherical lenses minimize chromatic aberration and distortion. Ring type USM system delivers silent but quick autofocus (AF); full time manual focus. Image Stabilizer technology steadies camera shake at up to 3 stops; weighs 23.6 ounces. Dust and moisture resistant; measures 3.3 inches in diameter and 4.2 inches long; 1 year warranty.

    Hide

    Reviews

    Global ratings 66
    • 5
      41
    • 4
      18
    • 3
      5
    • 2
      2
    • 1
      0

    Type of review

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    A good product, but having its own defects.

    For the money, a magnificent full-time zoom, sharp across the entire field from an open aperture, popular even to write laziness about the merits. I’d rather say about the shortcomings: Distortion at 24 goes off scale, becomes acceptable at 35, and at 50mm again, but already negative distortion in the corners, which becomes more and more when approaching 105. At 105 it’s a bit soft, it starts ringing from 5.6. From experience, I would say that it would be more appropriate to call the lens…

    Pros
    • Sharpness across the entire field, stabilizer, available focal lengths, versatility
    Cons
    • Picture, Price, Distortion (perspective distortion)

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

    In terms of money, if you take it, by the way, it is very affordable. More expensive than 5 thousand than 17-40, but with a stub and a large range of focal lengths. In latitude on the street, which is 17, which is 24, there is practically one raspberry, indoors on a crop and then narrowly. Even in this price category, only 70-200, but taking it with the only lens is somehow stupid, so there is only one choice - 24-105). The fact that it is dark is not a disadvantage for me - just count the…

    Pros
    • Sharpness, stabilizer (a sharp handheld shot was obtained at a shutter speed of 1`3 seconds), a convenient focal range. The camera is perfectly balanced, for those who complain about weight, I advise you to shoot at Jupiter 21M at 450d).
    Cons
    • For some reason, no one noted the BIGGEST distortion for electric - by 24 barrels, by 105 pillow. I won’t say that it breaks me off a lot (it’s perfectly controlled by software), but it’s there. Well, I personally want less flu, I need to carefully choose the background for objects, because almost everything is sharp from the ear to the moon.

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    Impressions from the purchase are good, buy.

    In general, this is the first Elka after whales, 2022 glasses through the ring, after 50mm 1.8, 35mm 2, 28mm 2.8 and the rest of a bunch of various rented glasses, but Elka is the first in life. The glass is always sharp, very unusual after all the other lenses, I think the color reproduction is perfect. He fell into my hands when he was with the Canon 700D, and even on it, sharpness and color reproduction are at the highest level. All whales and other non-aperture glasses for sale or in the…

    Pros
    • sharp glass

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    I like everything, the quality is good, the price is reasonable.

    I owned it for about six months, probably - I chased universality, I got it. I sold it and I’m thinking of taking 17-40 . yes, maybe for different purposes, but I decided that I need everything exactly like that, and the FR is not so important. I took a vacation to Spain, beauty with a FR + crop matrix, I don’t want to shoot from the bus, closer further. Universalism - yes, it's good, but it's better to have glass with a narrower "field" of application, but more suitable for your purposes

    Pros
    • Focuses quickly, quiet, workmanship, constant hole at 4
    Cons
    • I expected more, I used 50D, perhaps with an older model I would have shown myself better.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

    An excellent workhorse, staff member for FF (I use it from 5dm2). Of course, he does not "enough stars" with his aperture and pattern, but he is very stable in terms of results in different conditions, and this is worth a lot in the reportage genre. I appreciate it for this. By the way, I remember quite recently the time when the price of 24-105 / 4 and 24-70 / 2.8 (first generation) differed by only 10-12t. R. (approximately 30 and 42 thousand, respectively) In my opinion, this is the real…

    Pros
    • Stable in all conditions. Right now the price is right.
    Cons
    • With a more or less bright backlight, it catches hares. Draws ordinary, such is the color rendition

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

    Very handy for reportage photography. Ideal for travel. Of course, you should not expect an artistic picture from him, but at the F / 4 aperture this is understandable. Who needs portrait photography, he will choose the aperture wider and the focal length longer. Although at 105 mm. focus and a portrait with a slight blur can be obtained not bad. Despite the presence of a stabilizer, it is better not to use it. The picture with him is worse. Moreover, on a full frame, you can also raise the ISO

    Pros
    • Universal range of focal lengths. Solid look. Not a lot of weight. Pleasant to the touch. Fast and quiet autofocus. It doesn't give a bad picture. Affordable price.
    Cons
    • Not a big light. If it were F / 2.8, he would not have a price. Not very suitable for crop.

    Revainrating 2 out of 5

    Think twice before buying this product.

    Almost regretted buying it. Suitable only for travel, when there is no way to change the lens, but you need maximum freedom. And the compact size (relatively) also contributes to efficiency and convenience. The rest is only flaws. A very mediocre lens, it's strange that "L". It must be taken into account, however, that the rest of my lenses are also "L", well, fixes. Worst L in my backpack.

    Pros
    • Compact size, light weight, wide range of focal lengths, fast focusing, presence of a stabilizer, good build quality (no backlash)
    Cons
    • Strongly lathers on an open hole; very bad work out backlight; big distortion. Does not hold backlight - not suitable for landscape photography. Distortion at 24 mm is large - not suitable for architectural photography. On an open hole, it "soaps" very strongly - not a portrait lens. The stabilizer (in comparison with 70-200 2.8 L II) works out much worse. It's noticeably noisy, too.

    Revainrating 3 out of 5

    Not perfect quality, there is a small defect.

    Many people remember that when this lens entered the market, it cost 32-31tr, but after a couple of years the price dropped sharply to 23tr, and this is due to the fact that these lenses break down after a while and repairs cost 8tr, that is, the canon decided to sell your lens, like automakers, once in a store, and the second time in a service. (23+8 same 31tr.) My opinion is that when I bought this lens, I made a mistake, it would be better if I took 28-135 YSM (the same thing, only without…

    Pros
    • Good lens, fast focusing, dustproof.
    Cons
    • It will break in 3-4 years, the diaphragm plume will fly, repairs cost 8-9 thousand.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    A wonderful product, it's nice to use.

    I have been using this lens for 8 years. And in frost -30, and in the heat, and in the rain, and in the mud, he never had any problems. If you find fault, you can't use a polarizing filter with a lens hood installed, and I would like more aperture . But Canon marketers stubbornly stick to their line, offering the buyer to choose between a stabilizer and aperture. And so - this is the most versatile lens in the Canon lineup, for almost all occasions.

    Pros
    • - universality; - fast and accurate autofocus; - image stabilizer; - sufficient sharpness; - nice colors, beautiful pattern; - strong and reliable design; - dust and moisture protection.
    Cons
    • - chromatic aberrations; - catches "hares" in the backlight; - absolutely unsuitable for macro photography.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The quality is top notch and I recommend the product for purchase.

    The lack of artistry of his drawing and "disgusting" bokeh are often pointed out as a drawback. Dear comrades, there are fixes for creative photography (preferably top ones). As for the drawing, it is "electronic", there is no art in it, the quality and plastic from the L series are fully . "Bokeh" . Yes, probably not, but there is a completely digestible blur zone, which does not cause any disgust at all (there are such glasses). Where to go for artistic bokeh - it is written above. Another…

    Pros
    • Autofocus speed 5+ Color rendering Good job stub
    Cons
    • not found

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

    The lens has a leisurely, languid, philosophical view of the world. Role - rather portrait, Portrait, still life, interior. For landscapes, one might say, it is not at all suitable. Also, not suitable for reports and weddings. Can't keep up with the movement. Haste is useless. Despite the IS loves a tripod and a steady hand. Well shoots art objects, portrait and in studio conditions. Needed for photographers who love a corrosive look at textures, fragments and the play of light on objects. In…

    Pros
    • Good lens.
    Cons
    • All that is typical for CANON.

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    A good product, I advise you to try it.

    During the time of use, I never thought about selling it. As if I myself tried to find cons in it. I tried and found it. But each time I stopped and objectively evaluated it. And each time I came to the conclusion that I needed it. very convenient focal lengths for me. It’s good for reportage shooting. Personally, this is important to me. "razor" sharpness and "juiciness" of the picture. And all because there is no Photoshop there. (Although now, unfortunately, there is). But everything is done

    Pros
    • Reliable. Operative in focal lengths. The stabilizer does what it is needed for. At 105 mm from 1/10 s. Very good portraits at 105 mm. Even more so for a studio. In my copy, nothing falls out or rattles.
    Cons
    • Traditionally, 4.0! But just put up with it. And don’t be offended by him. He tolerates you. it means that it’s bad. It doesn’t mean at all. Just one step lower in the ladder. Not dust and moisture resistant. But with inept handling, you can drown the submarine.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

    I will not write what has already been written a hundred times, yes, he is Elka, yes, he is at the most popular focal lengths, and so on. But it is very banal, very literal and predictable. There is no creativity, no inspiration in him, he is like a Japanese robot - he is ready to perform everything with incredible quality, but he won’t write poetry for you, he won’t draw a picture. For reportage - the most suitable option, but for a portrait - not suitable, for nature - no, for sunset - no. I

    Pros
    • Excellent reporter, serious, high-quality, reliable, executive
    Cons
    • Banal

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The quality is top notch, be sure to try it.

    In fact, there is no alternative to the Canon 24-105 lens (70-200 f / 2.8 L IS does not count, this is a different range of fr), if you are fond of video and want to get decent quality videos without additional professional body kits: steadicam, slider, etc. The zoom ring is very comfortable in the hand, the smooth action makes it easy to shoot handheld, zooming in or out of the subject. In a stationary scene, after accurately focusing on the object in the zoom preview mode, the lens allows you

    Pros
    • After the release of a whole series of Canon cameras with the ability to shoot video, the lens has become so in demand that many still do not even know about it.
    Cons
    • Of the shortcomings, there is only one that does not allow making this lens a professional staffer - this is its aperture ratio.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

    I’m far from a professional (don’t judge strictly) . But the experience of using a DSLR is about 4 years . Before that, there was a whale 18-55, then I bought a fifty dollars 1.8 (I really liked it as a portrait), then 18-135 (I used it for about 2 years , along with a fifty dollars), then I bought a sigma 75-300 (I sold it a week later) . I thought about L-ke . I chose for a long time, read . I settled on this . I sold 18-135 and bought . The first thing I felt when you open the box, it's…

    Pros
    • EVERYTHING! TOTAL DELIGHT!
    Cons
    • There is a little lack of aperture in the room, it is easily corrected by raising the ISO (slightly 400 is quite enough), puff.

    Revainrating 4 out of 5

    The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

    I have been using it for more than two years, I bought a kit with 5dm2. Impressions are positive. I read reviews and noticed that they write that the stub compensates for f / 4. In part, you are right, this is true when shooting static scenes. Let's say in a normal and spacious restaurant where the first dance of the young will take place, for example, the Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (there is a capacity of 500+ people), then you will have to turn up the ISO and shorten the shutter speed…

    Pros
    • Sharp, quiet, reliable, lightweight, ideal for video.
    Cons
    • Working out dd, aperture ratio.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

    Great lens! Quite an adequate price for L-ku, corresponds to the quality. Easy to handle, medium weight, draws beautifully The main disadvantage is the luminosity. f4 is clearly not working, lathers. At f5.6 it is already always sharp, though it forces you to raise the iso indoors, without using a flash. Inferior to fixes from the same price segment, but saves the focal range from 24 to 105. I shoot at 60D - there is not enough wide angle, but the portrait is excellent, now I don’t even want…

    Pros
    • 1. Reliable design 2. Fast focus 3. Large range of focal lengths 4. Beautiful picture 5. The presence of a stabilizer
    Cons
    • 1. Aperture 2. The crop lacks a wide angle

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

    I've been using it for almost five years. I started with film + digital crop, then on 5D2. More than 90% of commercial shooting was filmed on it (and sometimes all 100%), because there is nothing more universal. For those who shoot fast-moving action, reportage style, or just a little bit of everything, having one lens in a case. for the money, this is the best. On many trips around the world, even on film, I shot the best shots on it, although there are usually different things in the case.…

    Pros
    • Fast, light, accurate. Failsafe. The stub is really 3 steps (although lenses with 4 and 5 steps already exist) Poured champagne, bathed in the Neva. Works like clockwork.
    Cons
    • Of course have. But judging adequately (soap in the corners, the presence of XA, etc.) - well, what did you want? This is not Distagon 21 / 2.8 and not 135L. As intended, the lens is self-sufficient. Rating - 5 points, experience - almost 5 years.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

    An excellent lens as a universal zoom, for landscape, cityscape, reportage. Travel lens. Because of 24-105, I switched from Nikon to Canon 3 years ago. I don't regret it. Of course fixes are better. For "artistic" portraits, real "macro", professional photography of architecture, "Canon" has other lenses. Optics "Canon" - about sixty lenses. If someone traveling on 5D-2 can only shoot with ultra-fast optics, and 24-105 everything is blurry or wild noises, this is not a problem with the lens…

    Pros
    • Very high quality made. Excellent zoom range. Juicy "elech" colors. Good sharpness. Stabilizer.
    Cons
    • Chrome aberrations are sometimes noticeable.

    Revainrating 5 out of 5

    I was surprised by the quality for the price.

    An excellent general purpose lens. Before that, there were 24-70 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 + Converter 2x well and aperture 50 1.4 I shoot mainly on trips and on the road and not in the studio, the issue of weight and versatility has become an edge. I sold all the zooms and took one universal, well, I left fifty kopecks. the glass is really good. Compared to the 24-70 that I got: Weight is a third lighter (this is important if the shooting lasts 2-3 hours, the fingers slowly fall off) Large FR…

    Pros
    • Light, durable, versatile, colorful, Excellent detail on 5DMK2, sharp from 4, the stub really helps out (within reasonable limits, of course), focuses quickly, accurately. Relatively not expensive.
    Cons
    • 24-40mm barrel, Decent chromaticity comes out up to f 5