Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens - Compatible with Canon DSLR Cameras (Lens Only) Review

Since I bought this miracle, I have never used the 35 F / 2 IS USM fixed in my backpack for almost a year, which often lacks an angle and which I took a year before buying this lens. The pictures are sharp, aperture and stub are normal. In terms of price - a little expensive - but judging by the weight, it's worth it. Examples of photos on a cloudy day are attached. Camera 700D

At first, the difference with the whale lens, apart from aperture, seemed insignificant to me, and the quality was worse in comparison with the whale (18-55mm f / 4-5.6). It just turned out to be an illusion. The subject surpasses any whale in general in many ways: sharpness, excellent bokeh, frame stabilization. If you are not satisfied with the kit lens and variable aperture, then this lens is simply the best, even with all the shortcomings I have voiced. The best lens for crop. It weighs…

Great lens that replaced my 18-55 kit and 50 1.8stm I shoot almost everything with them. Even 17mm portraits come out with a bokeh. Excellent sharpness in the open, minimal aberrations, there is a vignette, but I don’t remove it. Long thought to take or not? and will I notice a difference with the whale? I noticed as soon as I put it on and took the first shots. Below photo all at F2.8

Subjectively - a Canon EF 24-70 2.8L level lens, but with a stub and only for crop sensors. Very comfortable to work with, sharp. For me, the ideal glass "for every day" for crop matrices. Before taking the attached shot, the camera (Canon 70D) with this lens was overwhelmed by the Baikal wave, but nothing pah-pah, everything is alive :) Location: Lake Baikal, Cape Uyuga.

Overall very good With its pros: sharp, fast, good color reproduction, heavy as a virtue, does not tremble in the hands With its cons: In low and medium light, the Canon 450d cannot focus - you have to switch to manual focusing

Here's what I think about it. fast accurate autofocus, accurate color reproduction like on an Elk, can be viewed here http://fotki.

good lens Has pros: Constant aperture at all focal lengths good stabilizer sharp picture Its cons: A trunk, but for this money with such characteristics there will not be without a trunk

I often shoot handheld at night: the stabilizer is on, shutter speed is 1/10, of course, noise cannot be removed by any filters, this is an analogue of the Canon EF 24-105mm f / 4 If you shoot all day, then your hands get tired.

This lens produces a really excellent picture, unreliable, the accuracy of autofocus starts to walk, Several times I disembled it myself, tightened the screws, In general, despite the shortcomings described, for cropped DSLRs,

With its pros: Picture quality Aperture Focus speed sharpness bokeh Versatility Its cons: The trunk leaves spontaneously if the camera is tilted with the lens down a bit heavy

Has some pros: 1 good aperture (however, the background blurs relatively weakly) Very fast, The stabilizer works great, even at 1/8 Solid assembly, the trunk does not leave (at least for me), Such a big one . ))) Some cons: 1 2 Although for 8 months no dust has penetrated inside, 4 When purchasing FF, you have to sell this glass .

With its pros: Constant decent aperture, ultrasonic motor, stabilizer - all this is very useful, the location of the rings for focus and zoom - everything is convenient. With its cons: One turned out to be decent, and the second has dust between the lenses, back focus and a noticeably smaller depth of field.

Has pros: 1 2 Possibility of manual focus correction without switching to manual mode. Got cons: A year later, when shooting up / down, the trunk began to move out a little, changing the focal length.

Pros below: Aperture, blurs the background into circles very nicely, sharpness. Different cons: the course of the ring is very tight and it is very distracting from shooting.

I tried to buy this lens in March, So before buying, Considering the price of the lens, definitely get one for myself after the prices become normal.

Only the EF-S mount distinguishes it from L-ki, otherwise I didn’t see the difference, although I already have an elderly carc (400D) Before buying, I tried tokina 17-55 / 2.8, and so the original is much better! Very satisfied =) I advise the stingy not to pay twice! Has some pros: - tenacious autofocus - DOF is present, despite the crop and the 2.8 point - everything is fine with the case, it dust, it works without noise, I think it depends on the operating conditions and the accuracy of…

As I had been using Tamron lenses, I began searching for a native lens that would work with my D50. At first, I planned on purchasing a Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM lens; however, after further consideration, I decided against it. After reading the evaluations, I gained some perspective and realized that it is still designed for full-frame cameras, although I use a crop sensor. Then I came upon this lens; the pricing, of course, threw me off because it doesn't appear to be L, but it actually

1. If you have to choose between 17-55 and 24-105, don't even entertain the idea of going with 17-55! - It is superior in a variety of respects (2.8, focusing speed and tenacity, it is better and faster to sell used) 2. Immediately after making the purchase, select a standard protective filter to use as a viable option. Hoya HD Protect 77 mm is a gauge size. ((Do not take UV because it is a complete waste of money; you would be better off saving it for future expenses;))) 3. 17-40 and 24-105 is

The sharpness is excellent, beginning with the open. The edges are superior to those produced by a tamron. Stabilizer - I can take a picture of a city at night using only my hands, at a wide angle, using only 1/4 of a second, and it's simple! Even though the bokeh produced by the tokina 16-50/2.8 is generally more interesting, the overall quality of the image produced by the tokina 16-50/2.8 is superior to that produced by the tamron 17-50/2.8. When compared to the tamron and the tokin, the…

This lens does not have any equivalents for crop in terms of the combination of its properties, and this is the only crop lens that may possibly be of a high quality at these focal lengths. Since I started using it a little more than a year ago, it has almost reached the status of a standard lens due to its adaptability; yet, it cannot replace the zoom because of its limited focal length. Some pros: 1. Aperture. 2. The actual weight as well as the practical design. 3. Punctuality 3. 4. The…