Nikon D3100 DSLR Camera with Auto Focus-S Nikkor Zoom Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer) Review

Actually, many friends bought this model for themselves and are happy, they took it to use it, they shot it everywhere - the pictures are excellent. In comparison with the same kenon 1000 or 1100, it is an order of magnitude better in terms of image quality. In addition, the Nikon whale IMHO is much better and sharper than the Kenon one. In fact, a DSLR at the price of a soap dish, which shoots much better than stupid hyperzoom soap dishes with a bunch of megapixels, which are of no use. The…

I took it with my wife after a small party where I held the Nikon D5100 in my hands, but this copy will be much more expensive. And given that even on the official website, the manufacturer refers all these models (from D3000-D7000) to amateur . Why overpay initially for something that you may feel the need for this in a couple of months or you won’t notice at all? )) The model is good understandable and the most important thing (I think so) for beginners is the intuitive menu! All buttons are

Before that, I used FujiFilm S1600, I shot in manual modes. I read a lot of thematic literature, and when I realized that I was ripe for a DSLR, I took this camera with an 18-105 lens. I shoot in M ​​mode, it's more convenient for me. The quality of the photos is excellent, in automatic mode the camera raises the ISO to 3200, if it is not limited in the settings of the maximum ISO value. I would not advise the camera to those people who have not shot in manual modes before and will rely only…

I took with a whale 18-55. The quality of the photo can not be compared with a soap dish, of course. You begin to understand the lack of opportunities for a whale lens after buying a fast one))). After 6 months, I decided to buy a 50mm 1.8 (with autofocus). The quality of the photos began to please! After another 3 months, I realized that I needed a flash, I bought a Metz 36. I'm satisfied. It turned out "amateur budget kit." Who needs more, he takes better and more expensive. Of course, I…

Great for an amateur. The basic image quality of a SLR camera provides. The rest of the shortcomings are not so critical. Doors are open for the implementation of creative ideas. The best lenses take the best pictures. The matrix allows you to shoot at dusk without a flash as during the day. To whom it is heavy - buy a fifty-kopeck lens. Not with every card it works for a long time / correctly. Under the guarantee for a week, 2 Kingmax 10 class cards were changed for me - the card is damaged…

The first DSLR (after the Panasonic megazoom). I figured everything out in a couple of days - the camera is very easy to use, a little small for my hand, but I quickly got used to it. For the first time I saw bokeh in my photos, autofocus works clearly only in lighting, access to the menu in two clicks, programmable buttons, tolerable whale lens - I'm just delighted!

This is my first DSLR!) Just super)) I chose between the Canon 500D, Nikon d5000, and Nikon d3100 for a very long time . I read a bunch of forums and my choice was leaning towards Canon, because everyone wrote that Nikon has a dark lens and a bad screen . I agree that Canon has a better screen (but this is not the main thing), but I didn’t like their colors either . some kind of brightened everything ((In general, I decided not to overpay for Canon and bought this)) very satisfied))) Unusual…

I can’t judge sharpness and functionality, this is my first DSLR! But she really got me hooked! The quality of the pictures has changed many times compared to the compact, even at the initial stages in auto mode, and when I switched to semi-automatic and M modes, I was immediately hooked by the photo)))) KIT lens pleases! For the first time it is more than enough! Of course, I grew out of it, but so far I don’t see a replacement for it at a wide angle, FR 18-35mm for reasonable money (if there…

I have been using the camera for 3 weeks now :) At first I wanted to buy a cheaper Canon 1000D DSLR, but someone proclaimed that similar nikons are cheaper . I was looking for, and came across this wonderful camera! + more video! I am very pleased with the purchase, the quality of the pictures is just 10+ There is nothing included with the camera, better buy a card reader instead of these cords, it will come in handy more than once!) And be sure to have a film on the screen! It’s better to…

It was given to me in February of this year for my birthday. Before that, there was a Kodak C140. The picture quality has improved. There are more interesting compositions. It does not charge for long, and the charger is always with me because of the large space in the bag. However, in not sunny weather, the pictures are of poor quality. And the video is only 10 minutes, although I think it depends on the memory card. But it is not important. In general, it’s not a pity to give a lot of money…

They took it on credit, they never regretted it, an adequate semi-professional for its price, of course there are cameras for big money and cooler ones, but this is more than for family amateur photography, I recommend it to everyone, but don’t discontinue Nikon! Takes pictures, clearly, blurry pictures, very few. If you understand all the modes, you get high-quality pictures. charging is enough for about 500 photos, in high quality with periodic viewing, the battery charges quickly for a…

I bought a conon d500 to replace it, it was stolen ((I read it for a long time before choosing and the number of positive reviews played a role, plus the price, which allowed me to take another 35mm. In the first two days of use, there was a desire to return this thing back, constantly blurry frames, no auto focus , even in landscapes and in good lighting, there is simply no screen, it is impossible to evaluate whether the picture came out or not, and this is the main disadvantage in this…

In general, a very good device for its 15-17t. R You can attach a gps receiver to it (maybe someone likes geotags) Battery packs and control panels are also sold, it is a pity that the IR receiver was removed, it is not always convenient to use a wired remote control. I bought a kit with 35mm f/1.8 and use it as my primary lens. Whoever buys a "SLR" and uses it in "auto" mode, and complains about bad pictures - learn how to use manual modes. Who wants to get a "blurred background" in the…

I bought it in September, literally two weeks before a trip to Europe. This is my first SLR. When I chose and saw that for 25,000. you can buy a camera with an 18-105 lens, I didn’t think about it, but immediately ordered it through an online store. I bought the fotik for 24,900. Good and high-quality pictures under any lighting conditions. I took about 2,500 images. Of course, then I looked at my mistakes (especially with focusing at a large aperture value). At night, I basically tried not to…

In general, the impression is excellent! But if you have a nikon f lens at home, then buy only a carcass. If not, then for the first couples, the beginner will be pleased with the kit lens, which can be purchased in the kit. Also, I don’t feel sorry for the DSLR (I personally take it on all mountain and water trips). It is better to immediately purchase a light filter (it doesn’t even matter if your lens is good or bad). The weight corresponds to the size, I do not know why it is in the minuses

I consider it to be one of the best among devices in its price category (in terms of price / features / quality ratio). It can be used not only as a "pioneer" SLR, but also as a second camera for reportage work. 3 fps certainly not a fountain, but the price of the device is not 60 thousand. In general, if you throw out everything unnecessary from it, such as videos, tutorials and built-in graphic editors, and give even more camera capabilities, that’s for sure, it would be a hit for 5 years.…

I bought this device for myself and I can’t get enough of it! Unlike my older brothers, even if it’s cheaper, it’s not inferior in quality at all! As they say, it doesn’t matter what device, what the photographer is important! .I photograph everything in a row. And in the cold and in the rain and on vacation in the mountains. Never let me down. Satisfied with the purchase for all 100!

In general, a very positive device. From all tested by me in a close price category PENTAX K series Kit (very poor photo quality, and not Full HD Video) SONY Alpha 290, 390 Kit (not bad, but I would like a video). CANON EOS 550D Kit (They were unreasonably expensive with almost the same parameters of the Nikon D3100 Kit), FUJIFILM Expensive and lying colors (embellishes by increasing the contrast, as a result, in some photos there is darkness under the eyes).

Let me summarize: -Great DSLR for beginners and amateurs alike. -There are a variety of connection interfaces. -The machine is quickly recognized by the computer. -There are many shooting modes,even HD video. -You can put any filters, flashes and additional equipment on it. I took it with an 18-55 lens (with an Image Stabilizer), without a stabilizer, these are completely 2 different things., It gives its advantages!

For a very long time I studied the current market for cameras in the price category up to 35,000 and settled on this model. Nikonovtsy are generally great, in order to attract buyers to nikon as a "system" they give maximum functionality and quality at the initial level, and at the initial level they may even lose something, but they count on the further use of the "system" for the benefit of optics and other devices enough for nikon.