Sony SLT-A65V 24.3 MP Translucent Mirror Digital SLR Camera 18-55mm Lens: Review, Features, and Benefits Review

The camera is 3 years old. Completely satisfied. Pretty easy to set up. If you shoot professionally, then everything is just wonderful shots. Macro shots are good too. Pros: -Photo quality is great - Crop helped a lot when shooting landscape - It is possible to take good pictures without processing Has cons: - Does not work well in the cold, however, this is typical for all cameras

Pros: - Fast (good autofocus) - Fairly compact - Good picture quality - Fairly cheap optics - Long battery life Has some cons: - Minolt shoe, you need an adapter for almost everything - Low working ISO - In poor lighting with Live View Parameters disabled, the screen may slow down

The camera came across a Japanese carc, and Japanese optics. Some pros: 1)24mp 2) High-quality viewfinder 3) 10k per second 4) Folding display with two degrees of freedom and very high quality color reproduction. 5) Although plastic but high-quality case :) 6) Logical and convenient controls. 7) It comes in a very good kit, both wires and software and everything is very complementary to the image. 8)GPS 9) Rarely misses exposure :) Some cons: 1) A standard kit lens lathers around the…

Photo: Shutter video at 10fps: ? v=NKt2ufY8hoU I have been using it for more than half a year. an excellent camera if you study it. Whale 18-55 is quite normal, but not worth its almost 7000, the trunk plays,comllects dust, it rotates when focusing, thereby knocking down the polarizing filter. I determined the sharpness to be normal at 18mm, this is f / 5,6-8 and at 55 it’s already where then of order f/13 I shoot mostly in A and M modes. The machine gun is also good, but it strives to…

I took the cheapest fix 50 \ 1.8 the picture is better, but often the focus is not so hot, I found out that the ideal sharpness is at f4.0 I suffered for a long time with a non-ideal focus at a wide aperture, until I guessed to lower the resolution of the image to 12m - a miracle happened))) the lens became sharp at an open aperture, at 2.2 it is perfect! The pictures look like professional photos! Example: ? page=0 Perhaps the sharpness is even more ideal, but for portrait shooting it has…

Great video with very fast autofocus, the number of megapixels matters, here's an example: ? page=2 And although it is written that the capacity of the battery. for 500 photos, but apparently this is when everything is with a flash, because I did 1800 at a time and would have done more, but the card got clogged.

I took it for my girls (wife and daughter, they are novice lovers). in the "auto" mode, there are hardly anycommpetitors. I am very pleased with the camera. Here are examples taken with this camera without processing: ? page=0 ? page=3 ? page=2 ? page=6

This andcompetitors' devices seem to shoot similarly. More important, forcomparison, is the choice of lens. Who, in my opinion, should turn to this particular device. 1. Vision problems, but I want to shoot. Everything is clearly visible in the viewfinder, including the current setting information. And as you can see, it will. 2. Who cares about the video. Inferior to a decent video camera, only in stabilization. (preferably sober). Acomplete 2 in 1. In manual mode, you can get a clear video

for a long, long time I chose a camera to replace the a500. I did not want to change the awl for soap. But this camera is different. camera is great! pleasing to the eye everything . that it turns out - both photos and videos. . . complete with a whale 18-135 does its job at 5+))) bb, sharpness, autofocus at its best. . . in a room with external puff is also good. . . there are no critical flaws. . . took for 34800r. definitely worth the money. . .

To begin, I needed a new camera to replace my Canon 400D, so I decided to get this one. With the expectation that during this period of time, the matrices will have become less noisy and other attributes will have grown. I chose this camera since it was the only one in the bunch that featured GPS (given the nature of the activity, having GPS is important; however, GPS is only found in quite luxurious soap dishes and extremely pricey Nikona models). I don't consider Samsung as a technique). To…

Purchased my very first DSLR camera. We went with Sony since we needed him to be able to shoot high-quality images and movies. We considered both the Sony A65 and the Sony A58 because, according to the reviews, there is not a significant quality gap between the two. The Sony a65 has a viewfinder and produces high-quality videos. Yet we reasoned that taking the A58 would be the most cost-effective option. When we compared the two cameras in the store, we discovered that the viewfinder of the a65

Because of the several advantages that come with SLT technology, I made the decision to buy this camera, which will be my very first DSLR. These benefits include constant phase AF in video mode, increased rate of fire, simplification of the camera design due to the lack of slamming mirror mechanics (in theory, longer service life), electronic viewfinder (EVI) (although for some people this is a disadvantage), and the fact that the speed of using VI and LiveView is the same. In addition, these…

I just purchased an A65. There is a sign that says "Made in Japan" (for me - so at best in one of the developing countries, and not in the queen of technology). Both of the copies I viewed had the focus on the back of the screen. At one particular angle, one whale glass is angled inward. In another, the glass coats the corners uniformly, but the carcass backfocuses a little more clearly than in the first example. He did take it. In the service, by the way, it is not feasible to hand over the…

Nice camera. After using the Minolta D7D, this camera appears to be more of a plaything. Yet, the construction and materials used are of a high caliber. There are benefits as well as drawbacks associated with the high resolution of the matrix. On the one hand, you are able to obtain photographs with extremely high resolution and more creative leeway when cropping. But, this is only possible with high-quality optics and ideal shooting conditions. The camera is somewhat noisier than the older…

When it comes to taking photographs as well as videos, I believe that this camera is the most capable option available in its price range. I am completely content with the option that was selected! I solved the problem of the camera's lack of a noisy matrix by purchasing a fast lens, which allowed me to simply lower the camera's ISO. Other than that, the camera is very cool))) We have never once been sorry that we made that decision! Has pros: a lot. a sensor with a resolution of twenty-four…

Has pros: Good quality. Variety of modes, clarity. Ease of use. Weight is average. Its cons: Very bright flash. Children and animals squint. Adults can tolerate, but still it is very bright.

Before that, there was a Sony a330 camera, compared to it, the colors are a little worse on the a65, but you can take pictures at iso 800, 1600 and the picture will be good on the old device, there was no such possibility at all. The electronic videofinder is excellent in good light better than the optical one. In the dark you can see the noise and I do not have enough resolution of the viewfinder. It is very convenient to focus with peaking (when contrast transitions are highlighted in color)

It is better to shoot in the program auto "P" mode. and it’s even better to have a second portrait lens, you can completely manual, for example, Helios 77M6 1.8-50, and you will be very pleased with the result - there is practically no noise, a clean picture. in normal shooting, the 18-135 3.5-5.6 lens works well. Its pros: fast autofocus, ISO up to 800 workers, 1600 only during the day Cons below: in auto mode, it tries to set ISO 1600, it is better to shoot in software auto "P" mode.

I tested it on others and took 700 photos, plus I shot it on video (with a total length of 20 minutes) there was still 40% of the charge left. since I bought it with an 18-55 lens, I’ll be honest, it’s awfully small, I’m going to buy somewhere up to 200, and in general I’m very satisfied)))) IMHO ! Its pros: 1) well, what pleases 24Mr. 2) the battery lasts somewhere for 2-3 hours, but it doesn’t hurt 2. 3) the picture on the video is beautiful. 4) in the video Af automatic is good, but you…

Filmed so far only on a kit 18-55. I took a set of 18-55 / 55-200 for 36 kilorubles - the only thing that was available in the city for reasonable money. Delivered by courier to friends. They have Canon 550D. They immediately tested at high ISO, general pictures and videos. Nowhere Sonya does not lose. When I chose it, I was frightened by tests on ISO above 800. In reality, I did not find ANY DIFFERENCE with the 550D, except that Sony has better colors on the whale in all modes, including…