📷 Tamron AF 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 Di-II VC Lens: All-in-One Zoom for Nikon APS-C DSLR Cameras Review

good zoom, good autofocus, as I already wrote noise in the video, but this is a small drawback, because the video is recorded on the camera very little, there is a video camera for this. Adjustment was not required, good autofocus at all points. The work of the stub is clearly visible. Manufacturer's warranty 5 years - registered on the site. I use on NIKON D5300. For a non-professional, a great zoom lens. Temporary operation will show all the advantages or disadvantages of the lens.

The lens is very light, there are focal lengths that are suitable for any situation, and there is a rubber insert that protects the lens from dust. The image stabilizer started to act up, and the design of the lens does not inspire confidence in terms of its reliability. These are the disadvantages.

I purchased the Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 lens because it focuses quickly and clearly; when you buy it, be sure to perform a back-and-front test; I bought only the third copy; thus, purchase it; you won't be sorry you did.

Pros: There are no advantages other than the range of focal lengths. Has cons: the soap does not go anywhere and still remains so noticeable (especially at a wide angle) highlights the pictures, and in the shadows and in the background there is no detail at all.

good zoom, good autofocus, as I already wrote noise in the video, but this is a small drawback, because the video is recorded on the camera very little, Manufacturer's warranty 5 For a non-professional,

Has some pros Sharp, fast autofocus in good light conditions, well-assembled, there is an image stabilizer Cons below: There are none for this price! A lens for all occasions, you can shoot in such genres as landscape, animalistic, nature.

I bought this lens and handed it back to the store on the day of purchase. I didn’t hold a worse lens in my hands. My Nikkor 18-55 staffer, although not without flaws, shoots noticeably better. From the same Tampon, the photo quality is like on a mobile phone for two hundred dollars. The resolution clearly does not even reach 14 megapixels. Filmed on Nikon D90.

Good lens, drove to the mountains. This is the lightest "station wagon", I shot panoramas, portraits and macro on the D5100 - all handheld. There is practically no movement - 10% of raw shots, and then if you bring it closer to disgrace. We set a fixed aperture of 7.1-8 (mode A), ISO 100-200-350, and everything works out for you: the chrome aberrations go away, the depth of field is sufficient. The bokeh is pleasant - "not nuts". You don’t need to aperture anymore, (if without a flash)…

Yes, here. Pictures without processing https://yadi. Sk/i/BN8tz93_3LrQkD https://yadi. Sk/i/Vs2PzVEW3LrR5f https://yadi. Sk/i/vnVi8zuZ3LrRHM I recommend for a standard lens when buying a camera Sharp. A good alternative to regular ones of the same level and cheaper. Got a copy of the back focus. The foreground to the subject is sharp. Behind blur. The depth of field can be moved if the function is on the camera. Or choose when buying.

I took Nikon 18-105mm f / 3.5-5.6G AF-S ED DX VR as a replacement and was pleasantly surprised. Tamron turned out to be much more collected, sharper and at the same time cheaper. Autofocus is quiet, focuses quickly and clearly, the only thing in poor lighting can look for focus for a long time. Nikon focused faster, but often smeared. Because of this, many photos turned out to be unusable. Tamron has a much higher percentage of sharp photos. When buying, be sure to do a back / front test, I…