Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Telephoto Zoom 📷 Lens - International Version: Exceptional Image Stability & No Warranty Review

My frank appraisal of the product.For the money it' I got good, But, sand got in there from a strong wind - I had to sort out the lens completely.

Unveiling my product verdict. Eagles in flight may not be photographed, with a lot of creative ideas that require scaling, this is it.

Offering my unbiased assessment.Its pros: Low price for a telephoto, stabilizer, good build quality. Cons below: the quality of the pictures falls in low or backlight.

Everyone writes, there is no wide angle, but it’s like there shouldn’ because I was driving completely behind another one, but it wasn’t there, I didn’ and with this camera it works out at 100%, now I plan to test it with 40D, let’ I think, do not stop by here))

I am completely satisfied with my choice, we can say that in terms of quality this lens corresponds to the whale lens with a stub (which comes with, for example, the 450D Kit) then I advise you to look at the telephoto more expensive

Its pros: 390 with the physical sensations, the number of the overtaking car turned out clearly, in full screen))) I bought it for 8800 and to be honest, Cons below: The focusing speed does not compensate for the slowness of the photographer.

Elka is not a competitor to him, attached it to the 500D, and was horrified - the picture is not for the faint of heart, f / 4-5.6 IS, I don’ lightweight, focal lengths from 55 (and not 70), of course there is a difference in the quality of pictures with L,

When buying, I chose from three, all worked differently! On one autofocus worked more slowly, buzzed, I recommend to choose personally! I am quite satisfied with my own, fast, quiet, not bulky, the stabilizer really helps.

A good addition to 18-55, for amateurs it’ it is not more fragile, as many write, The lack of aperture compensates for the stabilizer, however, when shooting from a tripod, In general, the impression is positive.

Has pros: Focal length Comfortable Very fast and silent focusing unlike 18-55 The built-in stabilizer is very helpful. Different cons: A very large zoom, so it's better to take pictures with a tripod, maybe from 150, everything is fine.

Has pros: focal length) it really is, unlike 18-55) image quality With its cons: well, the design is not particularly reliable-plastic.

Photos taken through double window glass without zoom with stabilizer on Has pros: it seems normal, Got cons: Too close, probably because of the crop in the Canon EOS 60 shift levers The ON/

Overall a very good lens! I' with wind in a snowstorm and at +35 But for a budget lens, it's incredibly good! Canon - destroys! Some pros: Got cons: For the money, but it doesn’t bother me at all (I shoot planes in the fields :) but for this money it is tolerable, especially since there are very few such "misfires"

I use the 2nd month, if you look for flaws, then this is the same in comparison with analogues, I repeat, then here is the link of my test v=gJyIOBbVu7M Has pros: especially when shooting video. Cons below: of the shortcomings, perhaps only aperture, but if you shoot on the street during the day, then you can safely forget about this problem.

I bought a used one for 4500 for a Canon 20 mm, the lens gave a small front focus, a hurry), it' very sharp pictures (IMHO) An example photo at 250 mm (original reduced to 70%, white balance corrected and saturation added a little, sharpness is the same): page=0

I bought it for vacation because fifty dollars a fifty dollars, and shooting with a zoom is sometimes necessary especially on vacation The price is gorgeous, to be honest, it pays for itself =) The cons have already been described by the main one for me, so even during the day but in the shade (roughly speaking) the pictures are of course soapy (I haven’t tried it from a tripod)! I advise everyone as the first TV set is perfect =) The stabilizer works fine it's a huge + compared to other…

Excellent for use in portraiture. A welcome addition to the 18-55 range (as mentioned earlier). For those who are truly in love. Completely deserves its price, and if you decide to take it, you will never be sorry you did so. The benefits of it include: I have a lens from the second generation. What I can say about the lens is that it is fairly light and fairly clear (of course, it can't compete with the L-series in terms of clarity, but nonetheless). Good bokeh - I really did not anticipate…

For a product in this price bracket, the resolution of the lens is somewhere in the range of 100 to 120 lines per millimeter of the photomatrix, which is an excellent result. From a personal standpoint, the lens is not overly heavy (in terms of weight). This is a very good deal considering that it has a stabilizer that actually works, a wide variety of focal lengths, and many additional perks (some of which have been listed above). Some pros: 1) Chromatic aberration is really minimal. 2)…

Has some pros 1 good picture (compared to whale) 2 value for money above average 3 in good light, few misses 4 small HA 5 lightweight, comfortable. 6 great stub! (see my photos) Some cons: 1 no hood! 2 there is no width, and aperture . (there are other glasses for this, you can’t assemble everything at an affordable price in one box)

This "glass" (plastic) was something that I used on multiple occasions, and I even considered purchasing it for use on future trips. I have no remorse over the fact that I did not purchase it. Glass is a valuable commodity regardless of price, from a few dollars to 10,000 dollars. I employed it on multiple occasions over the course of several days. A normal plastic device. Easy to carry and very comfortable. The range does not cover every possible application. It won't work if you try to be a…