💻 Get Two SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 Flash Drives (64GB) with a Bonus Everything But Stromboli Lanyard - Bundle Offer Review

I bought a new 4K TV for a new TV, I need a high-speed flash drive to play 4K content, you know, 4K movies are harsh in volume and you need not only read speed, but also write speed. I recommend. Take money. Got pros: The main thing is a good write speed, corresponds to the declared characteristics. Personally, I think this is more important than design and various exotic forms. In NTFS format, the write speed is around 100 MB / s. Good and stable results. The connector is closed by the case…

Quite high-speed flash drive, corresponds to the declared characteristics. Specially tested in a crystal with a large amount of data and copied a 33 giga file, there is no subsidence in speed. Linear write 140 MB, read 180 MB. exFat file system.

Just bought (128Gb) and ran fio on lenovo t460p, results: sequential read : 150Mb/s sequential write: 140Mb/s 8k random read: 8Mb/s, 1000 iops 8k random write: 1.8Mbps, 231 iops In my opinion, for a flash drive is very worthy.

I bought it a year ago, everything was fine, good speed, fast controller, etc. But problems have recently begun, the file system began to crumble, for a week I had to drive a checkdisk five times. Reformatting didn't help. Under the guarantee, I decided not to give it back, I bought a new one, with such problems they could refuse to change it, they will say that everything is OK with the flash drive, and at first glance it is so. In the new one, I was immediately alerted by the speed, only 45…

Got pros: Cool slider with fixation. Moderately fast, the speed does not sag. Writes 90-100mb/s Cons: The speed is less than stated, but not critical. Died out of the blue after 3 months.

To summarize, while it is not impossible to use, the recording speed, dimensions, and volume do not correlate to the money that is being asked for it. We can also conclude that the actual amount is somewhere around 80 gigabytes, rather than 128 gigabytes, due to the significant dip in speed that occurs during the filling process. Pros: Read and write times are, on average, noticeably faster than those of inexpensive flash drives. After one and a half years since the purchase, it has not stopped

Also, an obstacle to watching movies on the player may be the fact that the flash drive is formatted in exFAT from the factory, which not all players see, especially old ones. It is treated by reformatting to another format, but the speed of work may drop.

It's too early to talk about reliability (but the old SanDisk flash drives - I have 5 different ones with active use work from 4 to 8 years without breaking). The speed of copying large files from HDD to USB 3.0 is approximately ~108 mb/s. (Does not fail - tried on a volume of more than 17Gb) Its pros: 64GB SanDisk Extreme Go, USB 3.1, SDCZ800-064G-G46 . Work speed. Characteristics correspond to the declared. Not very hot (compared to 64GB SanDisk Cruzer Ultra Flair, USB 3.0). Good (not small)…

Took on Ozone. One gets the impression that they are trading in substandard goods, tk. not the first time I fly into marriage.

Total: it is quite possible to use, but the recording speed and dimensions do not correspond to the price and volume. And because of the critical drop in speed when filling, we can assume that the real volume here is somewhere around 80 GB, not 128. Pros: Read / write on average is significantly faster than cheap flash drives. Still working a year and a half after purchase With its cons. First, the little things: the dimensions are large by the standards of flash drives - almost like some SSDs,

I bought it in the CSN 3-4 years (if not 5) ago. I gave away something like 4500. Not cheap, I agree. But the flash beat off all the money - up to the. I keep my papers on it. Already not enough. I want to buy more and I'm considering either Go or Pro. I read the comments of some and wonder - people, do you only eat with your head? Have you tried thinking? About Pro they write about three copies and a flash drive kabzd. Maybe you still need to buy not on Ali? About Go - about an unreliable…

Real transfer rate: Speed ​​on USB 2.0 - reading 28 megabytes / sec, writing from 12 to 18 megabytes / sec. Speed ​​on USB 3.0 - reading 70 megabytes / sec, writing from 22 to 35 megabytes / sec. Speed ​​on USB 3.1 - reading 180 megabytes / sec, writing from 40 to 55 megabytes / sec. Slow but bulky flash drive. For those who need really very fast, then you need to add a couple of thousand to the cost of this one and purchase the SanDisk Extreme Pro.

The speed of a flash drive depends on many conditions: 1. the presence of usb 3.1 on the motherboard and a correctly installed driver. 2. In addition to Win10, I tested on Win7, on the same computer and the speed was 4 times less, apparently there is simply no usb 3.1 driver 3. By default, the flash drive is in exFAT format, with it the speed is only 112 Mb / s, and the LG Smart TV 2.0 TV does not see it, but after formatting to FAT32 format, the speed increased to the declared 200 Mb / s. The…

For a long time I thought whether to take a new flash drive for testing. All the same, I found a promotion for 2337 and took the 128 GB version. I did not want to spend a large amount for testing a specific flash drive. The speed turned out to be exactly 3 times less than the speed on the earlier SanDisk Extreme. As I checked, I formatted both flash drives into the same file systems, set them to the same cluster size and threw the same file to be copied and read. Of course it's variable. As a…

I bought it in case you need to quickly transfer large files (like movies) to the drive and take it with you. In general, it copes well with this task. Added screenshots of synthetics and more real user cases under Ubuntu (formatted in NTFS). A video file of about 3 GB was uploaded for 9 minutes. Under Windows, the situation is better - a 2 GB archive was filled in 1.5 minutes. Recording from Synology NAS - 7 GB movie in about 5 minutes.

I think no one is interested in synthetics, that's what reality says. USB 3.1 port, target - SSD disk (564/515 MB / s, which is guaranteed not to limit, Win 10 x64). So, the movie reads 184 MB/s and writes 89 MB/s. Small files (photos, pictures, exel) are read at 83 MB/s and written at 8-20 MB/s, very small files (scripts, text documents) are written at 0.5-2 MB/s Synthetics says that it reads 190 MB / s, but writes 57 MB / s - sequential file writing in 128 KB segments in multithreading mode

Still, you can't call it slow. Fast quality flash drive. This flash drive is a little worse than USB Flash Drive 64Gb - SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 let's see how long it lasts in general, quite a good flash drive Different pros: Fast flash drive Volume: 64 GB Reading speed: Up to 200 Mb/s Write speed: Up to 150 Mb/sec. Writes much faster than cheap flash drives. This flash drive is almost the same as USB Flash Drive 64Gb - SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 Has some cons USB 3.1 one name is the usual SanDisk

The comment is about Sandisk Extreme Go 128GB SDCZ800-128G-G46. On the box is the inscription: 200MB/sec Read Speed 150MB/sec Write Speed In fact, on my old computer with USB 3.0 (which is now fashionable to call 3.1 gen 1 thanks to Intel, which still cannot implement 3.1 gen 2 at the chipset level): Read: 106MB/sec (serial, direct) Write: 33MB/sec (serial, direct) If the flash drive is loaded more than 95%, then the write speed drops to . 3MB / sec. This is a failure. Identification…

So. I don't know what the "experts" are talking about. But on a modern mother (AM4, x470), on the "front" input (the one that is connected to the mother by wire), on the tenth Windows right now I'm pouring a movie at a speed of 120MB / s. For those guys who gave low marks because of speed, it's time to upgrade their infrastructure, and then drive to a flash drive. By mechanism. Everything is perfectly inserted, the flash drive does not leave anywhere. Some of the unsubscribed apparently do not

I contacted technical support for clarification. They said this speed is only at 3.1, which should be at 3.0, they promise to clarify. The box says that the speed should be the same on both usb 3.0 and 3.1. When I wrote this question to technical support, the specialist quickly left the chat)) Today I will send them the test results. In fact, the research carried out by Sandisk specialists will unsubscribe))