Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 204
  • 5
    69
  • 4
    119
  • 3
    15
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Zilliqa team don't knowledge but zilliqa have so many supports such as kyber, 0x any many more, and zilliqa ico is one of the successful ico, zilliqa is the best-decentralized cryptocurrency

Pros
  • Zilliqa is the one of the most successful ico ziliqa ico raised more than 22million$, but the current market cap of zilliqa is more than 250million$, who invest on zilliqa ico they earned more than 2000% return in 4 months
Cons
  • According to big peoples, zilliqa team doesn't have knowledge about blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and Zilliqa team is small, and all don't have much knowledge

Zilliqa runs on the best blockchain which is blockchain3.0. also, the zilliqa has the great market cap. but the team of zilliqa is not experienced by the blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

Pros
  • Zilliqa is the worlds first public, permission-less blockchain that has successfully implemented sharding technology. Zilliqa is a faster, more advanced blockchain. Zilliqa project has great advisors and support of advisor from established project Kyber. as compare to bitcoin and ethereum they run on blockchain1.0 and blockchain 2.0 respectively. but Zilliqa runs on advanced blockchain which is Blockchain 3.0 technology.
Cons
  • Zilliqa team does not have the huge amount of experience about crypto and blockchain. Also, zilliqa uses only transaction sharding, not State sharding. also zilliqa has not do marketing of their project.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The legendary

- You can mine Zilliqa with GPU and CPU 80% of the tokens will be mined during the first 4 years and last 20% in the next 6 years. - Zil token is used to pay transaction fees for dAPPS and smart contracts. - Zilliqa was written in such a way to increase its speed and scalability along with the popularity of the network. With faster than VISA TPS and faster than Pay Pal. Originally ERC-20 token now working on their blockchain. - Zilliqa is set in such a way that the more people use it the…

Pros
  • Sharding
  • Experienved team
  • Scalability
  • Unique concensus
Cons
  • Need more market sentiment to drive up the price

this project is one of the best Silicosis. Breathing crystalline silica dust can cause silicosis, which in severe cases can be disabling, or even fatal. ... Lung Cancer. Exposure to respirable crystalline silica increases the risk of developing lung cancer. ... Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ... Kidney Disease.

Pros
  • the contracts , the way of making the project bigger and bigger Zilliqa is the world's first high-throughput public blockchain platform - designed to scale to thousands ​of transactions per second. Zilliqa brings the theory of sharding to practice wi We are holding a workshop on secure smart contracts in Singapore! Join us on 13 November, 2pm-5pm. You can find more details
Cons
  • only the team is not active and no answers

Zilliqa's scalable solution Zilliqa is attacking the scalability problem with its own solution allowing multiple transactions to be processed when there are more nodes on the network. Basically, it rebuilds the blockchain architecture from scratch. The model they are using has a hybrid consensus protocol that will increase throughput with each of the 600 additional nodes in the network. Zilliqa's blockchain works by dividing the work done on the network, with increasing throughput for every…

Pros
  • Solve the problem of scalability Blockchain Scaling Dilemma Photo through Fotolia One inherent weakness of blockchain technology is its inability to expand. The problem comes from the fact that when the number of nodes in a network grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to reach consensus. Looking at a human network can be helpful to understand the consensus issue and scale up that face of the blockchain: If you have a meeting with a small group of people, it is not difficult to make a decision. You may find that some of you do not agree with everything, but you will easily see how each person feels and can reach consensus. As the group grows to the hundreds you can still get a good idea of ​​how people feel, by voting or some similar approach. It starts to get harder to count the votes, and you can not be sure everyone is honest. As the team grows to the tens of thousands, or even millions, your electoral system must grow in complexity, and with the amount of energy needed to make it work. You will find more people do not act honestly and it is becoming increasingly difficult to know when or if people have voted. It's not a perfect analogy to talk about blockchain consensus, but I think you get points in that it becomes increasingly difficult to reach consensus as an increasingly large network. And this is where scalability issues begin, because the network size and network speed are inversely related. So when another increase decreases. Solutions that are being explored by most blockchains now include increasing the block size, so that multiple transactions can be validated in each round of consensus, or by moving some of the information out of the blockchains. completely. Although these solutions will help with scalability issues in the short run, they will never expand the need for blockchains to handle thousands or tens of thousands of transactions per second. They are simply a measure to prevent the gap from overcoming the underlying problem. In order to actually fix the scalability, the entire blockchain architecture needs to be redesigned so that the network size and network speed are no longer inversely correlated.
Cons
  • Ethereum is about to release a full-fledged mechanism to address its scalability problem. This can take away some of the advantages of Zilliqa on this platform.

Zilliqa should be at least $1+ to match the market cap values of Cardano and EOS. ZIL is so undervalued!

Pros
  • public blockchain platform that implements sharding. designed to meet the scaling requirements of real-world applications. Zilliqa has been under research and development for two years. It has powered several ground-breaking deployments commercially to date. Tokens in Zilliqa are called ZIL.
Cons
  • This ensures a level of safety but is wasted by a lot of computers involved in digging for a while, but there is only one winner.

“ZILLIQA/ETHEREUM is in a range bound and the continuation of uptrend is expected. The price is above the 21-Day WEMA which acts as a dynamic support. The RSI is at 53. Trading suggestion: There is a possibility of temporary retracement to suggested support zone (0.00015200 to 0.00013880). If so, traders can set orders based on Price Action and expect to reach short-term targets.”

Pros
  • Zilliqa opened the month of August on $0.067306/873 satoshi and from there went on to record a monthly low of $0.025184/416 satoshi. The currency recovered from those lows to reach the values of $0.042484/647 satoshi and closed the month off with $0.044458/632 satoshi. September saw the price slowly bleed out to its current levels.
Cons
  • Zilliqa, being a newbie in the cryptocurrency, recorded a monthly low of which it bounced back on.

ZIL peaked at $ 0.23.2 in early May. Currently, the price of ZIL has dropped 44.44% since the time of the above. However, this is not a concern as this is a necessary adjustment after the strong growth of ZIL starting in mid April. In addition, this decline is also affected largely due to Bitcoin prices. In particular, the market was down in May. It can be said, the current ZIL price reflects the true power of Zilliqa, not too high and not too low, there is moderate and reasonable adjustment.

Pros
  • Profits and the ability to attract miners: Zilliqa's PoW mode maximizes profitability for miners, thereby attracting more new miners. As time goes by, more and more miners mean more transaction speed and security. Especially, although the Zilliqa platform has expanded, the fuel charge used for each transaction will remain the same, without affecting many miners like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
Cons
  • Scilla is a non-turing language. This means that the language can not be used to program some applications that require certain types of conditional statements or certain loops.

With Zilliqa, PoW will be applied to multiple blocks at the same time instead of just one, which both saves energy and benefits miners. Each month, Zilliqa will need about 12 hours for total PoW operations (at the beginning of each epoch cycle), at this time the graphics card will run at full capacity. However, for the rest of the time, the graphic card will run in low power mode and the power consumption will be minimal.

Pros
  • Privacy with PBFT algorithm: PBFT is the default algorithm available that will have hostile nodes in the blockchain system. From there, each node independently authenticates all transactions, resulting in the output of most of the nodes in the network, avoiding single attacks.
Cons
  • Normally, the Ethereum-like PoW protocol will consist of many miners involved in a transaction, solving the algorithm, and the first to get the reward (and that transaction will become a new block in the chain). . This ensures a level of safety but is wasted by a lot of computers involved in digging for a while, but there is only one winner.

In terms of pure transactional speed, Zilliqa handles the problem solving for expanding decentralized networks and improving transaction speed at the same time, far outnumbering current rivals. Of course, each project has its strengths and weaknesses. So aside the pace of the transaction, we can look at other aspects.

Pros
  • Zilliqa is run by CEO Xinshu Dong. Xinshu Dong has extensive experience in developing blockchain systems and security since he was a program leader at ANQUAN - a blockchain system specializing in financial and e-commerce applications.
Cons
  • Currently, Zillqa has successfully run test version 1.0 (test-net 1.0). With 3,600 miners, Zilliqa's transaction speed reached 2,488 transactions per second. It is estimated that if there are 10,000 miners, Zilliqa will have a processing speed equivalent to VISA and MasterCard (8,000 transactions per second) at a much lower cost.

Zilliqa was born focused on solving this problem. The foundation of Zilliqa was built to increase the transaction speed by the amount of miner involved in the system (this is in contrast to most other blockchain platforms). Zilliqa's operating mechanism focuses on the fragmentation of the mining network into smaller parts, thus speeding up transaction processing - called sharding.

Pros
  • ZILLIQA was started from a well-invested project at the National University of Singapore (National University of Singapore). So, before the ICO, Zilliqa had a fully functional blockchain system - a product of the Zilliqa team under the auspices of the National University of Singapore. The Zilliqa development team includes some very prominent individuals in the blockchain world.
Cons
  • Currently, a large number of electronic money and smart contractor projects have problems in expanding and developing their networks, more specifically, the number of transactions made. per second is limited (for example, the current Ethereum is only around 10 transactions per second). In the future, the number of applications using electronic money and smart contracts will increase dramatically, so having a platform capable of handling thousands of transactions per second is essential. For most blockchains, the development teams have tried to solve the scalability issues with a whole array of solutions such as side-chains and masternodes. However, most of these solutions come with new disadvantages; most prevalent being the sacrifice of full decentralization. Zilliqa solves the scalability problem directly on its blockchain by employing an entirely new technological solution while remaining fully decentralized.

Zilliqa’s sharding distributes the work among the network, and once the work is done it’s all put together. What’s great about sharding is that it enables the network to become faster with new entrants, instead of slower. The more users the Zilliqa network attracts, the more transactions the network can process at an increasingly faster rate. With every 600 new nodes, the transaction throughput of the network increases. In theory, there is no limit to the number of transactions per second the…

Pros
  • If there are, for instance, 4,200 active nodes, there would be 7 shards. In this case, every shard handles 1/7, or 14.3%, of the total network transactions. All transactions that are verified by a shard are packed into a microblock. Then the microblocks of each shard are added together (7 microblocks, going by our example) based on a process called DS Epoch. Once these microblocks are added together, they form one block that is added to the Zilliqa blockchain.
Cons
  • If Zilliqa manages to launch its platform as it is envisioned, it will be one of the first blockchains that has solved the scalability problem without having to sacrifice decentralization. Scalability remains a big issue for blockchains. The first scalability issues that come to mind are the ones faced by Bitcoin in late 2017, and the network congestion on Ethereum due to the simple yet highly popular CryptoKitties dapp. While those two are the most-known cases, many other blockchains are struggling with similar scalability issues.

After Pornhub announced its partnership with Verge, TrafficJunky hopped on the bandwagon, now accepting the cryptocurrency in exchange for its services from its customers, many of them advertisers in the adult industry.

Pros
  • Zilliqa uses practical byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT) in its consensus protocol to cope with the rapidly increasing network throughput. Each node in every shard is placed in an order, with an elected leader in each shard. If leaders are suspected to be malicious
Cons
  • The Zilliqa project is promising a big month ahead, with new partnerships and an introduction to their new smart contract language coming soon. At only $0.13, this is looking like a very bullish alt-coin going into Q2 with a very promising future ahead

Revainrating 4 out of 5

To prevent scalability issues, Zilliqa uses a method called sharding…

To prevent scalability issues, Zilliqa uses a method called sharding. Sharding is a type of database partitioning — it breaks down databases into smaller, faster, and more easily manageable parts called data shards. These data shards are thus fractions of a database, meaning that the data shards only contain fractions of the information. Therefore the shards are meaningless in themselves; their content is only valuable when put together. Sharding also allows for all data shards to be stored…

Pros
  • You might remember how I mentioned earlier that Digibyte performs much better than most other cryptocurrencies, so in reality, this would actually be a reasonable thing to happen. For example, Litecoin, which at the time of writing is the sixth most valuable coin, can only manage transaction speeds of 2.5 minutes.
Cons
  • At the core of these scalability issues are the nodes employed by blockchains. Nodes verify transactions and secure the network. The problem with nodes is that the more there are in a network, the harder it becomes to agree on transactions; thus it becomes harder to reach consensus. For most blockchains, the development teams have tried to solve the scalability issues with a whole array of solutions such as side-chains and masternodes. However, most of these solutions come with new disadvantages; most prevalent being the sacrifice of full decentralization. Zilliqa solves the scalability problem directly on its blockchain by employing an entirely new technological solution while remaining fully decentralized.

The next large-scale event, which should influence the further development of the network, is a full-scale launch of the network, which is scheduled for the third quarter of 2018. If it passes successfully, this will favorably affect the course of the ZIL tokens.

Pros
  • Zilliqa project has good chances to take its place in the market, but this will need time, as well as favorable conditions (weakness of the competitors, the general growth of the cryptocurrency market, etc.). Buying this coin, you must be set up for a long-term investment.
Cons
  • The fuel of the platform is ZIL tokens, the total emission of which is 21 billion. The developers immediately released 60%, and the remaining will be allocated for the miners. By the way, the algorithm of the coin has a gradual increase in the complexity of the network. Developers want to stretch the process of extracting tokens for about 10 years.

ZILLIQA is a blockchain platform based on its own protocol. ZILLIQA offers its solution as a substitute for the obsolete Ethereum. And it offers a faster transaction speed, a convenient language for writing smart contracts and a well-scalable architecture. The team has already released an alpha version of the protocol. However, for a project that consists of code, it is better to have a ready version. There are many developers and advisers in the project team. There is a technical White Paper…

Pros
  • ZILLIQA is a new blockchain platform that is designed to scale in transaction rates. As the number of miners in ZILLIQA increases, its transaction rates are expected to increase. At Ethereum’s present network size of 30,000 miners, ZILLIQA would expect to process about a thousand times the transaction rates of Ethereum. The cornerstone in ZILLIQA’s design is the idea of sharding — dividing the mining network into smaller shards each capable of processing transactions in parallel.
Cons
  • ZILLIQA further proposes an innovative special-purpose smart contract language and execution environment that leverages the underlying architecture to provide a large scale and highly efficient computation platform. The smart contract language in ZILLIQA follows a dataflow programming style which makes it ideal for running large-scale computations that can be easily parallelized. Examples include simple computations such as search, sort and linear algebra computations, to more complex computations such as training neural nets, data mining, financial modeling, scientific computing and in general any MapReduce task.

This would mean that the total throughput capability of the network is 1000 transactions per second and would continue to grow exponentially as the network itself grows. This means that as more full nodes join the network, the more the network throughput increases.

Pros
  • Zilliqa is a public blockchain project that began in 2015 and has been designed to address the core problems of blockchain technology that inhibits its mass market adoption potential; scalability and transaction throughput
Cons
  • It does this by implementing an on-chain sharding solution using PoW to establish node identities, that works by subdividing the total amount of nodes on the network into smaller groups (shards), whereby each shard can process transactions in parallel to each other

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Jun Hao is a practitioner in various areas in the Computer Science domain…

Jun Hao is a practitioner in various areas in the Computer Science domain including blockchain, web security, trusted computing and program analysis. He was also awarded the National Infocomm Scholarship and graduated from the National University of Singapore (NUS) with a bachelor degree in computing science with specialisation in information security. At NUS, he co-founded NUS Greyhats, a cybersecurity interest group, which has won numerous cybersecurity events. He also co-founded Edgis, a…

Pros
  • After Pornhub announced its partnership with Verge, TrafficJunky hopped on the bandwagon, now accepting the cryptocurrency in exchange for its services from its customers, many of them advertisers in the adult industry.
Cons
  • Nonetheless, Verge proceeded to rub shoulders with another partner in the adult industry—this time, one of its most prolific advertisers. They will now be able to purchase their spots using cryptocurrency instead of fiat, removing them from the tenuous situation of having to handle online transactions in an industry that doesn’t have the best of reputations despite operating within the law in most countries.

Zilliqa is only for traders it always has a considerable amount of volume and prices is also stabilised, zilliqa team is not experienced. I don't like zilliqa concept

Pros
  • Zilliqa is a new generation blockchain technology, works on hybrid blockchain algorithms, zilliqa solves all scalability issues zilliqa rank is by market cap is 35, zilliqa always have a significant amount of volume, so for trading also this is an excellent project
Cons
  • Zilliqa team is not good, not experienced and not solving queries on telegram also not helping and the max supply of zilliqa is not good is 12.6 billion so predict is difficult.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

is a digital asset research and investment group, focused on blockchain…

is a digital asset research and investment group, focused on blockchain technology and cryptoassets. We strive to be a trusted resource, providing transparency and insights in the crypto space

Pros
  • Yonatan Govezensky is huge believer in Bitcoin and the blockchain technology. Vast experience of analyzing and investing in ICO projects since 2013. A fifth-year medical student at the Ben-Gurion University. Love soccer and all sports by heart.
Cons
  • Arnon Benshahar is an enthusiast data scientist. An expert in biodata and machine learning algorithms.Passionate about blockchain technology and algorithms.