Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Banasiuk ᠌ photo
1 Level
318 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens, black by Stanislaw Banasiuk ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

As such, there are no disadvantages, it is convenient to use.

I took it yesterday, so I’m not yet ready to voice all the pros andcomns to the end. Accordingly now. Carcass 600d. Kit 18-55 (lying around somewhere). Zoom Canon 15-85 - (I willcompare with it). Well, puff 430. Well, about the lens. Assembly Japan. His focus smears, two times more often than on the zoom. Rather, he does not catch on. Well, you catch the eye, but it takes the forehead. Secondly, everything related to bokeh needs to be sorted out, but he is able to remove the cap from the camera, at arm's length, so that the door three meters away, being light brown and lit by the sun, with a sunspot, is acompletely smeared dark spot. Zoom can't do that, I've already tried it. Most importantly, please note that this lens is not for travel. It's brutally inconvenient. He is highly specialized. I took it precisely because of the aperture ratio, and for portrait shooting. But I’ll take it on a trip, it’s the second one. I'm not too lazy, I'll take pictures from a tripod, all three from one place. Thencompare yourself. I'll post a link here. 4 stars - because itcomuld have been cheaper, and with a hood. It's funny, ofcomurse, tocompare all these three lenses in the field, but it's easier from a tripod, one by one, with a cable remotecomntrol. Nobody knows how to shoot at one aperture? I made a triple on one leaf, ISO 200. In aperture priority. With a flash - a whale and a fix, not very focusing :). If anyone swims, you can write, I'm ready to do more tests on order :). Write on , photo. Portrait photography from him. I'll have to experiment at my leisure.

Pros
  • 1. Aperture. 2. Sharpness. 3. Blur.
Cons
  • 1. Fix :) - not for everybody. 2. Focus - not always accurate and fast. 3. Price - not worth the money.