Review on Tires Michelin X-Ice North 4 215/65 R17 103T stud.-304862 by Mateusz Czyta ᠌

Very carefully approached the choice of tires on a new car 205/55r17 Lada Vesta SV cross decided not to save and take the "market leader" seduced by rave reviews Before that, I drove other cars on: some very cheap oak ones, which were obtained when buying a car on the secondary market Hakka 4 (killed, inherited from the car), Nordman 4 (new) Nordman 7 (new) No tire behaves like the MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 it catches hard even an asphalt track on a dry road at + 2-5 degrees To be honest, I'm afraid of what will happen next when the road gets icy. when maneuvering along a rut rolled in asphalt, the car starts to throw hard, the car hardly leaves the rut and rolls over to another lane, and this is all on dry asphalt at temperatures even above 0 at speeds of 50-60. If you accelerate during the maneuver (overtaking), then the behavior becomes even worse. It was scary to drive. For the whole experience behind the wheel, I got stuck on a rut only once on Nordman 7. And then, I think it was my fault, it was just a 20 cm ice crust on the road, so the Lacetti touched the bottom of the road, so I had to walk along the edge of the rut, and I somewhat exceeded the speed, accelerating to 50 under such adverse conditions, for which he paid. Here, the behavior of Michelin tires is generally inadequate. I could only expect this from the cheapest Chinese. Probably, the X-Ice North 4 is only for an icy rally track, which the manufacturer is very proud of, but for ordinary people who live in the middle lane and whose winter is either an ice crust, or porridge, or dry asphalt, these tires are absolutely not suitable. But, Michelin is not important, the main thing is to sell to hamsters (( On