Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📷 sigma af 17-70mm f/2.8-4 dc macro os hsm nikon f lens: ultimate versatility and imaging precision logo

📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision Review

11

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.4
Electronics, 📷 Camera & Photo, 👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(5)
img 1 attached to 📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision
img 2 attached to 📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision
img 3 attached to 📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision
img 4 attached to 📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision

Description of 📷 Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Nikon F Lens: Ultimate Versatility and Imaging Precision

Warranty 12 months. Lens type: standard Zoom Focal length: 17 - 70 mm Zoom ratio: 4.1x For non-full frame cameras: yes Aperture: F2.80 - F4 Minimum aperture: F22 Mount: Nikon F Focus motor: yes Image stabilization: yes Auto focus: yes :3Number of ED elements:3Number of aperture blades:7Dimensions (D x L):79 x 82mmWeight:465g Viewing angle:22.90 - 79.70 deg.minMinimum focusing distance:0.22mUltrasonic motor:yesFilter thread diameter:72mm

Reviews

Global ratings 11
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    6
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing special, there are positive and negative sides.

I took this lens as a regular one on my D3100 interesting to shoot scenes at 17 In general, not as bad as it may seem to you from the description above, but you can’ I recommend taking a closer look at the original lenses from Nikon.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A completely ordinary product, nothing remarkable.

To be honest, it did not live up to expectations, kit and the 50mm fix, is really lighter than sigma, and 18-105 focuses 2 times faster under the same conditions. Some pros: Probably the price, because native NIKON Nikkor AF 24-85 mm f / 2.8-4.0D is 2 times more expensive, iron, but this is a subjective plus, but not a razor. With its cons: Tight zoom in the "other" direction, focusing is not the fastest, the design is not very successful (moving trunk), the cover looks very cheap, the aperture

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Performs its functions, nothing unusual.

I am satisfied with the quality at the short end, I dare to suggest that for 24 I chose between this and Nikkor 16-85 Posed for a large aperture and a lower price. With its pros: Fast autofocus, decent color reproduction, build quality at the level. Cons: As the focal length increases (over 50mm and further) with the aperture clamped, and aperture beyond F7.1, Very upsetting.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A completely ordinary product, nothing remarkable.

When I bought everything, I was happy with it, I have been using it for more than 2 including macro, the quality is decent, the colors are not bad, not bad, but not great either. Pros: Ergonomics, weight, stabilizer, lens hood included, focal range, sharpness, macro mode, fast focus, aperture. Has cons: If you actively use it, then the trunk begins to fall out in a week, but it depends on what and why to shoot, but otherwise it doesn’ when you hover it, it wedges and you have to focus again, it

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Overall good, but expected more.

I am satisfied with the quality at the short end, I dare to suggest that for 24 I chose between this and Nikkor 16-85 Posed for a large aperture and a lower price.

Has pros: Qualitatively executed, the best, in comparison with whale, detailing, Built-in fast focusing motor (relevant for new carcasses), which is just good for cold Nikon matrices. Different cons: Still, insufficient detail compared to expensive Nikon lenses. ! Be sure to check the lens for front (back) for example, in the d7000), at the minimum focal length.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, not suitable for use.

went to 4 stores and tested 5 if the moderators don’t delete it, here is a link to a post with my lens tests in stores: Com/318141 in short, I wanted to change Tamron 17-50 to Sigma 17-70, but it didn’

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

At first I did not believe in the complexity of "fitting" the lens to the camera (as many write about sigmas) The first lens was a pre-sale marriage (it refused to focus), the second lens did not work at all, After switching from 55-200 nikkor, the difference is significant both in quality and in mechanics. Different pros: stabilizer, aperture, autofocus (quiet and fast), convenient focal lengths, constructive Some cons: on a short one - HA and distortion, all flaws are easily removed during…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

In comparison to the whale, this is a vast improvement; the photographs look much sharper, and that's something I really appreciated. A high-quality lens at a reasonable price. It seems like Sigma's 17-50 mm lens is the sole rival, but I went with Tamron because of the focal lengths and have been pleased with my decision so far. The pluses: The focusing speed, aperture, and focal length are all very convenient. The Conspiracy: There is a prominent barrel at the tip, although it is still…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

I cant say that I was completely satisfied with the product.

To tell you the truth, it has not lived up to the expectations that were set for it thus far. However, fifty dollars at f2.8 is really lighter than sigma, and the 18-105 focuses two times faster under the same conditions. At first, I thought that after making the purchase, I would forget about the 18-105mm kit and the 50mm fix. These are some advantages: The price, most likely, seeing as how the native NIKON Nikkor AF 24-85 mm f/2.8-4.0D is 2 times more expensive, iron; however, this is a…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It is of good quality, but I won't buy it again.

You won't be let down, I assure you as a full-time journalist. These are some advantages: In terms of execution quality, it is superior to whale, details, and colors. with the shortest focal length, a large aperture. Built-in quick focusing motor, functional stabilizer (important for new carcasses). Warm color tone that is only suitable for cold Nikon matrices. Cons of it: Despite this, there is not enough detail in comparison to pricey Nikon lenses. Make careful to verify the lens in the store