Pros
- Good ultra-wide zoom
Cons
- Doesn't always focus quickly
Tamron 10 24Mm 3 5 4 5 Aspherical Minolta Review
7
·
Very good
Rating
4.0
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo
Media
(2)
Details
| Brand | Tamron |
|---|---|
| Lens Type | Wide Angle |
| Compatible Mountings | Pentax KAF, Canon EF, Nikon F |
| Camera Lens Description | 10 |
| Maximum Focal Length | 24 Millimeters |
Description of Tamron 10 24Mm 3 5 4 5 Aspherical Minolta
10-24mm focal length. 15-36mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 16-38.4mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras. F3.5-4.5 maximum aperture; F22-29 minimum. Micromotor-type AF motor without full-time manual focusing. 77mm filters. 0.24m/9.45" minimum focus. Available in Canon EF, Nikon F (DX), Pentax KAF, Sony Alpha mounts. The world's first 2.4X zoom with an equivalent 16-37mm (when converted to full frame). The best magnification ratio in this class of 1:51. Extremely compact and light. Flower-shaped Lens Hood Included. 77mm Filter size.
Pros
- You can cover half the world (wide angle). Light. Comfortable. I use for video on crop. No adjustment required. Colors are acceptable and realistic. The 10-24 zoom helps a lot with reportage shooting.
Cons
- There is no constant aperture - when zooming during video shooting, the aperture clicks and the brightness of the frame changes. For a pro, this is unacceptable. The sharpness is clearly not up to the similarly priced Tamron 28-75 2.8. Sharp, as already mentioned, only on pressed apertures. There is not enough aperture in the room, and you can’t really twist the ISO on the crop) -: Sometimes it is illuminated from the side. We must follow.
Pros
- We must face the truth, and by and large, the only serious plus of this lens is the price. Well, wide, but by definition . Blend is there.
Cons
- A lot of them. I rate it a three. In principle, the tamron makes mid-price optics and does not differ in the frantic quality of the construct. The second point is that the lens is not sharp, there are problems with focusing, it is difficult for me to catch the white balance, incomprehensible yellowness appears.
Pros
- Wide angle, light weight, price, lens hood included
Cons
- Very long focus, sometimes "misses" and the image is blurry. The maximum open hole is 3.5, but I did not find a width with a better aperture ratio. Yellow-will have to finalize the frame in lightroom. Filters are expensive.
Pros
- A really wide angle on cropped matrices, aperture ratio, excellent color reproduction (although it turns a little yellow), Quite tolerable geometry at wide angles, distortions are certainly present, but in this regard it is much better than competitors. Hare-resistant. Despite the fact that China is assembled well, there is no backlash, a hood is included. Maybe lucky.
Cons
- Very sharp starting at aperture 13 only, which is convenient only in sunny weather. Disappointing on a cloudy day. Not an ultrasonic drive, it focuses somewhat noisily, but at the same time it practically does not miss. There is no dust protection, I don’t observe dust inside after a year of use, sometimes it happens on the camera’s matrix that it’s unpleasant. I did not like the autofocus switch button. It is interesting only in the range from 10 to 19, then it doesn’t feel right. Although this may be due to the fact that I do not use it in this range. Only for landscapes! Because shooting something at a wide angle is problematic, objects at a close location are "not alive"
Pros
- Wide angle. Explodes the cloudy sky with an atomic explosion. Price.
Cons
- On the Pentax K20, it sometimes focused uncertainly at 10mm and the colors were somehow not very juicy, until I figured out about escorrection (see below). There are no problems with K5. Of course, I would like the minimum focusing distance to be less than 0.24 m.
Pros
- Compared to analog sigma and canon, it's not so expensive. The sharpness is good, as is the image itself. I like:))
Cons
- Bulky, heavy. Check when buying very well (see comment)
