Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Siembor ᠌ photo
1 Level
139 Review
0 Karma

Review on Renewed Samsung Galaxy S10, 128GB Flamingo Pink - Fully Unlocked for Easy Access by Ada Siembor ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

There is a wow effect, it is even after 2 months of use. No, not from the delivery kit where everything is made of cheap cardboard (!), This is not an iPhone for you, the box with which (even without being an eplophage) you open with a breath!), here the wow effect arises purely from the usability and aesthetics of the smartphone. I switched to Samsung (the galaxy S line) from Apple, although I like the products of both companies (hello iPad and MacBook), I don’t like that the companies consider their users to be rabbits, which must be constantly bred, raising the price higher and higher (the Americans here, of course, outdid the Koreans ), but alas, while the trend is this, if you want a flagship, get ready to pay a lot, sometimes a lot. Who will say that Chinese smartphones are no worse and are cheaper - well, they are cool for inexpensive, my brother has Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro (with a quasi-transparent back) for a year already, his wife has Honor View 20 mochino edition (8/256 GB with a nice burgundy back) ), but when they turned the S10 in their hands next to their flagships, they said that the S10 is subjectively fancy (the screen and sound were especially noted, although for me, the red Honor View 20 is more beautiful than the S10). P. S .: I switched to galaxy S10 from galaxy S7 (I missed S8 and S9, although I liked it from the side), heaven and earth, I did not regret it (everything is better, even autonomy is better). But he left s7 to work in the fields, because he checked it, he didn’t fight for 2 years, but s10 would be a pity. I think that this is important (strongly and her stock) .

Pros
  • 1. Design (live the device looks and feels very good in the hand, others still pay attention, though there are many questions about the pearl color - it is very ambiguous, but black and red are win-win options); 2. Quality of execution materials; 3. Power and speed (even with an exynos CPU - and these are all PCT devices, there is enough power with a margin for any tasks, the software part - the One UI shell + Android 9 work flawlessly and glitches); 4. The sound of a smartphone (both in headphones - via 3.5, and via Bluetooth, as well as external smartphone speakers) - bold, juicy, plays any music perfectly (a music lover, I didn’t get my own headphones, but AKG seems to be quite good, especially among other complete brands ).
Cons
  • 1. Price (69k is expensive, at least for the 2022, even for a product from a world brand with high quality workmanship, you can buy this device in federal networks for 40-50k - this is not bad); 2. Autonomy (for such a power and battery capacity, it is not bad, but what prevented the battery from being made more capacious, at least by 4k mAh .)? 3. Camera (photo quality is good, but not super WOW) - a huge minus is that in order to take cool pictures, you need to be able to set up the camera (there are just a bunch of settings), and a simple AUTO mode cannot provide photo quality that matches the capabilities of the camera; 4. Fragility (the phone is all glass, the SuperAmoled display of the latest model and rounded) - it’s better not to think about how much the repair will cost if it falls, and it’s very difficult to pick up good protective glasses on it (either peel off or the fingerprint sensor on the screen starts to blunt ) - there is a film on the screen from the box, it is not bad - it will save you from smudges and scratches, but not from accidental bumps and falls.