It is advised that one should not look a gift horse in the mouth, and because I was given a phone, I should not do so. Yet, if it were up to me, I would not spend seventy thousand on this phone. There are five cameras on this one phone, but none of them are really excellent for taking selfies. External cameras perform admirably in bright light (really, even inexpensive smartphones are capable of this), and they take excellent pictures of both man-made and natural subjects. The moment, however, when it involves the photography of faces or skin, total nonsense is brought into play. When filming video, only stabilization is considered to be effective. Nothing at all, including colors, saturation, or anything. The excitement that people have shown regarding the photography on this smartphone is beyond my comprehension. Perhaps I am in possession of a phony after all? Selfie camera: the video is horrible, as if I were filming it on a smartphone at 3 megapixels; the skin doesn't take off very smoothly, and it seems to be lacking something. It's beyond my comprehension. The picture that was taken using the selfie camera is also a mess. Because I had red hair, you can imagine my shock when I saw that the color of my hair in the selfie had changed to a shade of dark blonde with not a trace of red. Again, there were some strange noises on the skin. in all other respects, a total fiasco with regard to cameras. In general, I have been a fan of Sony phones for a very long time, beginning with the push-button times =))) So before I got a Samsung, I had a budget Sony that had 2 selfie cameras. On that Sony, the width of the selfie captures a really large angle, it shoots faces perfectly, with accurate color reproduction and no noise, and there are 16 and 8 megapixel cameras specifically for taking selfies. Because there was only one lens on the front-facing camera, it produced superior results when capturing video; the main drawback was that there was very little in the way of image stabilization. But other than that, the cameras on the low-cost phone are a thousand times better than the ones on this device. The red price tag on this smartphone is 30,000 dollars, and I would not recommend buying a smartphone under any circumstances. In addition, I will state once more regarding screenshots that I frequently take them and that I am required to take them rapidly for business. But, taking a screenshot via the native app is a very difficult and time-consuming process here. In order to do this, I had to download an app from a third party. The music player was not included in the default settings. The response speed of the fingerprint scanner is extremely slow, and it fails to operate properly almost often on the first try. The film that was applied to the screen at the factory is of low quality; after three weeks, it was severely scratched.
π± Huawei P40 Lite JNY-LX1 International Version - 128GB Crush Green, Dual 4G and 6GB RAM
297 Review
Unlocked Apple iPhone 7, π± 32GB, Black (Refurbished) - Enhanced for SEO
318 Review
Xiaomi Camera Gaming Processor Unlocked
397 Review
π Renewed Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB Coral Blue Fully Unlocked Phone
383 Review
2 Pack EN-EL19 Battery & Rapid USB Charger For Nikon Coolpix S32-S7000 Cameras - OAproda
41 Review
NinjaBatt High Performance Battery For Toshiba A665 And L755 Series - 6 Cells/4400MAh/48Wh
40 Review
Keyboard Cover For HP Pavilion X360 14 14-Dk 14M-Dh 14-Dq/Dh 14-Fq 14-Ce/Cf 14T-Dh200 14-Dq0070Nr 14-Fq1025Nr 14-Dq0011Dx/Dq0004Dx/Dq0002 14-Dh2011Nr Fq1097Nr 14T-Dq300 14Z-Fq000 14-Cb185Nr, GPink
39 Review
2PCS Pack 15.6" Laptop Screen Protector | Compatible With HP/DELL/Asus/Acer & More | 16:9 Display
41 Review