Pros
- Fully corresponds to the declared characteristics. Great all-rounder. Ergonomic. Very strong.
Cons
- For this price, no.
Pros
- Replaces several lenses - convenient for reportage shooting on the street or in well-lit rooms. Solid appearance.
Cons
- Sucks up dust. The slits around the front lens (where the lens meets the decorative ring) and the slits behind the hood attachment ring cause dust to build up on the inside of the front lens and on the surface of the next lens. High price in 2022.
Pros
- Most important: FR range
Cons
- The trunk comes out. There is a lock button, but the lens somehow ignores it =))
Pros
- 1. A wide range of focal lengths allows you to use it as a travel zoom. 2. In the middle range, the picture is quite sharp. 3. Trunk fixation button.
Cons
- 1. Darkish. 2. Soap at the far end. 3. Barrel in the middle. 4. The stabilizer is rather weak. 5. The trunk always leaves. 6. Unreliable design.
Pros
- - The versatility of the range of focal lengths, of course - Stabilization is really good - you can take a more or less sharp portrait with your hands for 1/10 sec -In my opinion, a good study of details, at least in focus - lock lock - Focusing distance is constant at all focal lengths of 0.45 - which is better than that of "clean" telephoto lenses -The picture, of course, is much better than 18-55 -Build quality - the front lens does not rotate -Sharp over most of the FR range
Cons
- -naturally, a bit dark (it’s understandable) - for rooms you need a flash -mine has noticeable vignetting from 135, increasing more as the focal length increases. Compensated in part by peripheral illumination correction in the ON position -barrel distortion at 18 is noticeable -very noisy autofocus
Pros
- Zoom. The weight. Price
Cons
- Chromatitis. No, it always catches the focus. The trunk comes out. Poor equipment
Pros
- 1. Focal length 18-200! You can not carry 2 lenses with you, but get by with 1. 2. Clearly conveys colors. 3. Stabilizer. 4. Not heavy and not light, such as it should be (although the camera still outweighs a little). 5. As a Travel zoom - super, only L-ka will be better than it, but this is completely different money and weight.
Cons
- 1. The trunk leaves. (it didn't happen at first) 2. Sucks up dust (it has already sucked on the mirror and on the lens from the inside. Therefore, you need to buy a cleaning kit right away. 3. Autofocus misses: rarely through the viewfinder, often in Life View. 4. I was looking for Blenda for a long time (I found it in Barcelona, non-native, for 15 euros). We are asking for about 1500 re for Blenda. 5. Installing a protective glass is a must. 6. Could be cheaper.
Pros
- Pretty sharp, large range of FR.
Cons
- The trunk sometimes leaves spontaneously, the latch would not hurt, but it does not bother much.
Pros
- Versatile, inexpensive, perfect for a beginner.
Cons
- After 150-170 mm. you can not use soap strongly, for 18-20 mm there are noticeable distortions of geometry.
Pros
- The stabilizer helps a lot and is actually a very necessary thing! Try to take a picture with and without it, especially something further than 50 meters away from you on a FR of more than 90 mm. I think you will see the effect immediately. Yes, the viewfinder also clearly shows whether the stub is turned on or not. In general, glass is worth the money, but as always I would like it to be cheaper)) Plus - it is compact, not heavy, covers in quality from 24 to 180 mm FR - that's it when traveling. Protected enough from dust, in my opinion.
Cons
- There are geometry distortions of 18-22 mm, noticeable. Further, it seems to be normal, respectively, not the L series, but not cheap either, in general it’s normal. Vignetting is present, goes away with a decrease in aperture. There are relatively few aberrations, closer to the edges. Dear, relatively. Edge sharpness is poor. But also not Elka .
Pros
- 1. Focal lengths. 2. The quality of the image is at its best when compared with ultrasonics from competitors (sigma, tamron). Unless Nikon 18-200 can lose a little. As for the optical resolution, for an 18 megapixel matrix it is quite enough, in my opinion. Of course, not 15-85 and not 17-55, but still ... 3. Price for used - took for 13,000. Shot around the world, a small back focus on 18 mm, the rest was on target. 4. Stabilizer. Not the strongest, weaker than the same Canon EF 70-300, but not so voracious either. 2-3 steps gives. On imported resources, they write about him that he seems to be intellectual: i. E. unlike the mentioned 70-300, where it is 2-mode (1 - normal, 2 - for shooting in wiring), at 18-200 the stabilizer itself determines when to work in which mode. 5. Good design. 6. Fast autofocus. 7. There are few deviations in the quality of specimens, in contrast to the same sigmas, which must be chosen very carefully. For the cropped Canon, at the moment, it's probably the best choice if you need ultrazoom. By the way, maybe it’s important to someone))) The lens is quite large, larger than the Nikon 18-200, and it looks very solid on the carcass))) With such a weight, you can only hold the lens, you will get tired quickly by the carcass.
Cons
- Decently chromated at 18 mm at the corners, giving wide colored halos. This is really easy to treat programmatically already on your computer. A small aperture, common for all budget lenses, is no longer a disadvantage on the 600D carcass, given the working ISO6400.
Pros
- 1. Versatility 2. Fast focus, not USM but quite fast. 3. Pretty durable, not L of course, but don't worry about light hits. 4. Good image stabilizer.
Cons
- 1. Chromatic aberrations. 2. Soap at 3.5 and starting with 70mm focal length, working aperture 8-11. 3. The depth of field at 200mm is so meager that it is impossible to shoot objects up close, they simply will not be fully in focus.
