Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
seachem marine buffer 1 kilo logo

Seachem Marine Buffer 1 Kilo Review

4

·

Very good

Revainrating 5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.8
🌊 Aquarium Water Treatments, 🐠 Fish & Aquatic Pets

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to Seachem Marine Buffer 1 Kilo
img 2 attached to Seachem Marine Buffer 1 Kilo
img 3 attached to Seachem Marine Buffer 1 Kilo

Description of Seachem Marine Buffer 1 Kilo

Can be used safely in reef tanks. Contains borate for added stability. Contains magnesium to alleviate precipitation effects.

Reviews

Global ratings 4
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Another great Seachem product!

Works great. It doesn't take long to raise the pH to the desired level, so it stays for a long time. It is very useful and overdose is not possible. There is no gauge in the kit, but that doesn't matter. I highly recommend it!

Pros
  • Happy so far
Cons
  • Not happy with everything

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money at this size

We use R/O water for our seawater tank which lowers the pH. I first bought a small jar of this buffet from our local fish stores. The price was terrible, especially since we add this every time we add water to the tank. Found this larger size at Revain for a much better price. Maintains the correct pH for our marine friends.

Pros
  • Confident
Cons
  • Not the best

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Slow pH increase but appears to be a jump in alkalinity

We are working hard to build a larger marine aquarium. First, this is a very good value for the size of the marine buffer. A 1kg bottle should last most users for quite a while. I studied the dosing instructions for my 105 gallon system for a week. We had a pH of 7.7, which was slightly lower. I didn't want to confuse things, but after a week we were able to get the pH down to 7.9. Measuring pH can be tricky so I hope there is some margin of error and that it can be in the 8.0 to 8.3 range. We…

Pros
  • Consistent test results
Cons
  • Could have chosen a newer model