Canon EOS 6D Body camera, black Review

I took the camera at the beginning of 2022, if I'm not mistaken, it was only a month after the release of this camera. All problems are described in the Disadvantages section. At the time of 2022 it works properly, there were no glitches, except perhaps with flash drives - but this is a typical problem for all Canon cameras (before 6D I had: Canon 5D (first) and Canon 40D). I repeat - the built-in lens adjustment is a very useful thing. Also, I repeat that, however, sometimes 1/8000 or even…

I will try to objectively evaluate the camera by key +/- + photo quality 4+ with good optics and hands from the right place - the quality of components is frankly depressing I bought a camera several years ago for amateur photography, shot about 70 thousand frames during this time 1) Suspiciously quickly, a year later, scuffs appeared with careful operation, which the old man 400d had not seen in 10 years, but oh well 2) On a run of about 50 thousand, the mode switching wheel fell off from…

It is not clear from what the body was assembled for him. On the previous camera for a year of use, no scuffs, nothing peeled off

quick, user-friendly, and light in weight (unlike the mark 3). After the crop, the fact that it has three different RAW file formats is something that I really appreciate (I usually shoot on M, so the originals that are of the same quality are significantly lighter).

fast, convenient, not heavy (unlike mark 3). after the crop, I really like the presence of three types of RAW in it (I always shoot on M - the originals with the same quality are much lighter). With its pros: great camera! Compared to the fifth brands, the price-quality ratio is 5 :) Cons: a year later, the shutter broke (the shutter resource was approximately used up), but it was repaired without problems

An amateur camera with an excellent matrix and functionality. Suitable for all tasks, except that it is sometimes problematic to shoot dynamics with such autofocus. Pros below: Full frame for more or less normal money. Good matrix, high working ISO, ease of use. Its cons: Few focus points, one SD slot, moiré, shutter life 100000, unprotected screen, and so on. In general, they cut everything that could be cut.

The camera worked faithfully for 5 years, no jambs, everything is perfect! Nimble, large ISO, long battery life, optimal size, a variety of optics for it.

For DSLR shooting, an excellent device, the only thing lacking is a swivel screen. For amateur photography, the built-in flash is not enough. To implement the FF, you will have to fork out for good lenses. Its pros: - The price for the FF device (in 2022 it only fell by 6D, I bought it back in December 2022. I bought it on Ebay, even with its cost, plus shipping, plus customs duty, the device turned out to be cheaper by 10,000-15,000 than bought in 2022) - Relatively light weight - Pleasant…

For those who want the best option after the crop. I advise everyone. I think if you put L glass - there will be fire in general ! With its pros: Here you go. Finally I bought this miracle. Before that, I shot for 3 years on 550D + 18-135. Hung 50 1.4. I'm just delighted. Clarity,comlor reproduction, speed,comnvenience. I would say that there is really a tangible difference with the crop. And this is not the merit of fifty dollars, because I also drove the 550D with it for half a year. And…

made the third purchase in the store satisfied with the service and prices, the goods were late, they called and apologized and brought the next day. Special thanks to the courier, he patiently waited while we tested the camera. When they decided, only then they paid for the purchase. I wanted to buy a Canon 24-70 2 lens here, but for some reason it is not there, which is a pity.

I read all the reviews, I want to add my observations to what no one focused on. About the usefulness of Wi-Fi. The app for iOS is poor - only for iPhone. Why do you need such an application? It would seem to view (and delete unnecessary) photos. The idea is great: instead of a 3-inch camera screen, we get a normal 10-inch iPad screen, on which everything is much better visible - time; which is more convenient to hold in your hands - two. A camera in a bag or backpack. The implementation is…

In a word, the device is excellent, especially for that kind of money, I bought it just in time, now the prices have skyrocketed again, lucky) For me, such things as dust and moisture protection, the presence of a rotary display, a quick access button have never been critical, because the main thing for me is the day off result/picture, among other things, only ergonomics and focusing are important to me, but here they are at their best (for those who use the central point), I just don’t want…

What can I say after 450 matches . I'm dragging myself . the main question has disappeared, but will there be enough light? they write a lot there is no quick access to the white balance . Nonsense! add this function to "my menu" and voila. Two clicks and you're there. ) In general, the device deserves a solid four! now, after a year of use, I lower my rating . a solid three! auto focus on the center point constantly gets lost . (selects the point itself according to an algorithm I don’t…

I bought the camera for more than two years and, perhaps, this is the main assessment that I can give it. I was initially prepared for the fact that in terms of ergonomics and autofocus this is a truncated model - but it attracted a full frame Given that the buttons on the case can be reprogrammed, you can work with the camera In general, my assessmentscomincide with the opinions of other people: Summary: Canon was able to accurately guess the segment for which the camera is intended

Despite all the shortcomings that made it possible to reduce the price of this camera, it is, without exaggeration, the best Canon DSLR in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, and possibly also a DSLR amongcommpetitors (I saw a similar level of noise only in Nikon D610 and D4, in the first even a little better). It is clear that these shortcomings distinguish this camera in the semi-professional segment, in which it is usually used for leisurely street or portrait shooting, but the quality of the…

Before that it was 550. When shooting a homemade NG on a pancake, I raised ISO to 12800 and in the morning I found excellent quality photos (for a family archive). The camera is ideal for travel reportage photography. There was an opportunity to take the Mark III, but for my purposes and tasks, this camera is enough for the eyes. My IMHO "why" did not take the third: - 63 focus points - me. as a non-professional (I shoot for myself, for the soul), 11 in 6D is enough - 6.5 fps - for the same

in 2022 I bought myself a 450d, in 2022 - 50d, and now, it's time to buy it, albeit with hands, with a 12k shot, but 6d, full frame. by this time I have grown acomuple of good lenses and now I'm just reborn, like it's 2022 again! the first starry night, an opportunity and immediately: so far I've shot 200 frames, but I'm already shocked by noises, or rather their absence at 6400 and even higher, by focusing the central point (and I still haven't learned how to use others) almost in the dark.

I've been using it for three years. Mileage over 150.000. I shoot weddings, portraits, reports, fitness and much more. Fits absolutely everything. ISO set from 400 and do not worry. Rarely 100 or 200 (even on the street). Shutter speed at 1 \ 8000 (which is not) was never needed. Touch screen too. WIFI allows you to take pictures from above, holding the camera high on a monopod, as well as take pictures of yourself from a tripod. Plus for those who like to immediately throw the results of…

A wonderful camera, bought for 54 thousand. Before 6D, I owned a 1D Mark IV, yes, this is a different cl of cameras, but as practice has shown, something can be sacrificed - a double card slot, an abundance of focus points (in fact, I used only the central one), ergonomics (I'm used to singles). I needed FF for wide-angle lenses, sometimes the angle of the four was not enough in my shooting conditions, plus it is very light, I was tired of carrying a brick around my neck. Why didn't I choose…

I have been dreaming about this camera for a long time and finally I bought it in , went to the store, checked it on the spot and immediately fell in love with it. First impressions - I'm just delighted. Before that I had a canon 500d. The Canon 100 L professional macro lens fit like a glove, the frame became wider and the photo opportunities increased. So many different functions and settings, 2 instructions 400 and 100 pages. I'm already tired of reading :) It is very convenient to use manual