Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 23
  • 5
    6
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

The purpose of this project is to protect the privacy of the users and the transactions they carry out, despite this there are many challenges for these cryptocurrencies to be fully accepted since they may be used for other cases that could be negative. But it is at a high level of development, anyone who is trained to contribute to the project can do so because they have a large community that also support its use and help it to be used more and more. I really like this project

Pros
  • Privacy, offers the option to keep our assets private when we decide. The transactions are pivadas. Your asset and representation is this. It has its own chain of blocks, which provides speed and low cost in transactions, this is also due to the network architecture making an optimization in energy consumption in this way lowering the cost for data processing. This project is active since 2016, which provides support and solidity to it.
Cons
  • Possibility that your network is used for the financing of groups that are outside the law. They have a somewhat difficult compertencia since there are other cryptocurrencies with this functionality and are well placed in the market. in the last months he had a low yield on his quotation.

https://pivx.org/ Private, Instant, Verified, Transaction - Mister Me Too coin # 509478304854, except not well put together or managed.

Pros
  • Dandelion protocol integration is a newer term for me, and PIVX is the first one I can recall spelling out what this is and why it might be useful. Privacy is a big deal, which may explain one of the CONS I describe below. Compatible with the Nano Ledger - and while I effort to eschew appeals to authority, I do like things that work well with other things. SeeSaw Balance Reward System aims to disconnect the centralization of value in nodes / miners and "indirectly" encourage staking. This is either tremendous or the dumbest idea yet regarding nodes, not sure yet. It apparently also decreases the reward for staking when the number of stakers is at a high enough percentage of the total sphere. Now instead of wondering if it is a good idea to deincentivize masternodes, i'm wondering WHO and HOW they will determine at what time to reduce rewards / increase rewards / the fearful concept of decreasing rewards for both simultaneously and just updating their TOS.
Cons
  • While humor is always welcome around me, if your website TEAM section has pictures of people with names like Playstation Network handles ( Thuggins, Snappy Snap, and Fuzzballs) I personally find it hard to take them seriously. The technical white paper has misspellings. Not what I want out of mathematically dependent products. Oversight and copy editing did not in fact die in colleges in the 90s, they just turned into HR majors because people think a machine can do what a person can do. The machines at this point still, can not.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

an anonymous coin

an anonymous coin

Pros
  • anon
Cons
  • purple is odd and pivx is not a name that will ever be massively adapated