Review on CBDAO by Ryan Evans
I can say that the venture left me with awful recollections
I might want to discuss my perspectives on this undertaking that I knew quite a while past yet which left me exceptionally awful recollections. From the outset the reason for the undertaking appeared to be exceptionally alluring and in reality unique in relation to the others. Notwithstanding, I can say that I discovered that not all things are as it appears, on account of this task. All in all, the point of the task, as the name recommends, asserted that DAOs were set up to test decentralized arrangements, or all in all, contracts. This objective appeared to offer a place of refuge for clients.
As of now, the general status of the undertaking is by all accounts unavailable. Since the authority site of the undertaking isn't working, that is, it is shut. The solitary connection we can reach to the undertaking is online media accounts, yet there is no dynamic director here all things considered. They haven't posted any new posts for quite a while as of now. In spite of the fact that data about the engineers has been introduced from the earliest starting point, I was unable to see a connection to affirm this.
By and by, I put resources into this token since I figured I would truly make a benefit by putting resources into this token. Since the token was getting more important consistently, however sooner or later I was losing cash as the symbolic's worth out of nowhere dropped. From that point onward, even now, the worth of the symbolic remaining parts exceptionally low. In spite of this, I can say that it truly astonished me that the token is exchanged on a few trades and also, its high exchanging volume. In any case, my recommendation to clients isn't to put resources into this token, the choice is yours
ο»Ώ
Pros
- exchange volume is high
- recorded on a few trades
Cons
- The site has halted the assistance
- no dynamic supervisor
- low worth token
- I lost cash by contributing
