1 Level
6 Review
10 Karma
Review on ICON by JooHwan Han
If the icon fails, Korea will be a big disgrace. The speculative breeze blows…
If the icon fails, Korea will be a big disgrace. The speculative breeze blows, and the government's embarrassing features and investment frenzy have only poured out strange funds, but I still do not want to see the icon, which is known as a well-known project, fail. For the trust of the domestic block chain industry, I hope that it will no longer work and develop well.
Pros
- Icon is a block-chain platform that can launch various DAPPs through smart contract like Etherium, and is a project that is being developed to provide an interchain protocol that enables interworking with different block chains. Also called the Korean version of Etherium Icon Coin is a domestic financial group called the Daily Financial Group The company was launched on October 27, 2017. Using a block-chain-based distributed network We are using 3rd generation block chain technology, Transactions 100 times faster than etherium Secure payment and user-friendly UX / UI ICONEx created with a supporting program Wallet address ID unique to the transfer and exchange transaction You can use it conveniently if you have It is said that it provides ICO Nick service. Although it was described as Korean etherium, Since the ICO was held in Switzerland, The icon coin that must comply with the law is a block chain Based on technology, banking, securities, insurance, etc. Medical, university and enterprise. For the first time in Korea, where Internet technology has been developed, the ICON project was the first project that really understood the block chain and was really looking forward to it. The technical value of the interchain in this project is very great, and it has been well received by many investors, offering a variety of solutions for user convenience. I was impressed with the clean white paper and I could not help but invest in joining the famous blockbusters advisor Don Tab Scott.
Cons
- I thought that it was a little overkill from the video of the sports car when the advertisement of the icon (ICON) was smooth and the advertisement of the money was a little too much. When it came to talk about the money, I thought that it should be a little careful. I think that the actual development capacity is not as good as the concept, and I think it was a very overrated project because of marketing. Some of the partners and investors who have helped ICON in the past have also received bad evaluations and rumors, and as time goes on, they will not go out, I do not know how much I've poured into it, but I do not think I should be trying to make up for the fact that it shows less than the present level of development. I hope that the funds invested by many investors will not be meaningless. If we look at the development capability below the level we have shown so far, the speed of the project, and the explanations to the investors, I think the popularity of the past has been so bubbly, It is also doubtful. I am also worried that even if I achieve my goals, I may be left behind in the market competition.
