In fact, the number of projects that users generally trust has decreased significantly recently. I think the main reason for this is that the projects did not bring new features for a long time, or in other words, they did not stop on promised promises. The project that I will share my views on today looks the same, ie it looks like a project that has not been innovated for a long time and is likely to be abandoned. The aim of the project is actually not that different, that is to ensure that P2P transfers between users or merchants take place quickly and securely. However, as I said, it seems that it has not achieved its purpose.
The main reason I think this is because this token has not been in circulation for a long time. In addition, the number of exchanges listed is very small, so at least only one exchange I know of is listed. I can also say that the low value of the token prevents me from having it. After all, it seems unreasonable to invest in a token that has a low value and does not consistently increase in value.
Also, I did not like the design of the website of the project, because there is insufficient and incomplete information. As an example of this I haven't seen any verified information about developers. Moreover, I can say that it is impossible not to think that the project has been abandoned because they have been silent on their social media accounts for a long time.
Finally, when I follow the roadmap of the project, the lack of really mentioned features and the lack of updates for a long time make the project risky in my eyes. For this reason, I do not recommend that you take care of it or even participate in the project. Please be very careful about this.