Review on RefToken by SERDAR SEYLİYEV
I could not see the amount of supply in circulation. Can I be wrong about this?
If you need an application to centralize your blockchain, there are projects where we can develop our applications through mediation. However, some of these are constantly introducing new features, while some are losing user engagement day by day. The RefToken project was launched to serve this logic, but its general purpose is to make the use of the token more common.
When the project was first released, it started to serve with a beta version as a trial. Less cost was promised when the full version came after this release, but I think this promise was not fulfilled. Because you can still see that the fees are high.
It is a little difficult to access the website of the project. Because I think it requires a very strong internet network. In addition, the website design is very confusing, I think the main reason for this is the lack of language support.
The token type is currently listed on many exchanges, but I found there was no amount of supply in circulation. This situation is very scary. In addition, there is a huge transaction fee for clearing transactions. When I look at these types of projects, the high fees can cause user loss.
In short, this project is losing popularity right now. It is very difficult to find detailed information about the project. Because even on the website, there is no detailed information about how it serves.
Pros
- It promises to save you from brokerage and further costs.
- listed on several exchanges.
- I do not think there will be any problems with security.
Cons
- social media accounts are not active.
- The token transaction fee is too high.
- The fees for the full version are too much.
- the website is very difficult to understand.
