Review on Sony HDR-CX220E Silver Video Camera by Velizar Chayshev ᠌

To put things into perspective, all I wanted from the camera was good sound, continuous filming, and a pocketable size, and I received all three of those things. Below are some advantages: Excellent quality of the sound. sound that is particularly loud. For the purpose of making working recordings of rehearsals and concerts, I used the most basic type of a video camera. Everything has been checked, and it is readable. I am content with the way it sounds. Listening test: The video quality is good even when it is dark, and it does not become unwatchable. However, there is a graininess to it. Within the context of this section, everyone has it. - There is a setting for reducing the wind noise. - Two different sonic recording intensities (high and low) - Audio in both 2.0 and 5.1 formats - Low-Light Mode A large number of additional environments. Solid construction; it feels good to hold in one's palm. Below are some downsides: China is China. The drawbacks are quite typical, and they are present in any low-cost amateur camera. That is, you can only take pictures during the daytime hours. Everything turns into grain in the evening. Put photo mode out of your mind. Even higher resolution can be seen when viewed on my mobile device:) Only the smartphone produces poor sound quality when played in "loud" environments. The menu is quite difficult to use, but once I got everything set up, I just turned off or put anything that I didn't need on auto, so it's not a big deal anymore. You are exempt from going to the menu at this point. Unless playing back video files is a really inconvenient process. In my opinion, this is a flaw that exists in all Sony menus. In principle, the cost of something like this ought to be half as much as it already is. In point of fact, the camera is not necessary for other people; nevertheless, if I wanted to film the holidays or other types of activities involving my family, I would not carry this with me.