
In general, some reviews are surprising, where people need to "connected and it worked by itself. " I had a need at home in a working environment to assemble a network of 3 computers, one of which would be a server with a web interface, and at the same time the Internet connection would be through a router, or another computer (not a server). Mikrotik turned out to be a great solution for little money. I set up NAT, Amazon, DCHP, HTTP requests with a certain 1st level domain are transferred to my server in LAN - I am more than satisfied with this device. I don’t understand the minus ones - if you need to “plug it in - and it works by itself”, why buy a router that is not designed for this? For show off?

WiFi router TP-LINK Archer AX73, black
120 Review

Wi-Fi router netis WF2780, black
111 Review

Wi-Fi router Xiaomi Mi Wi-Fi Router 4A Gigabit Edition Global, white
165 Review

📶 Boost Your Wi-Fi Signal with TP-Link N300 Wireless Extender and Router - 2 High Power Antennas, Access Point, WISP, 300Mbps
216 Review

🔌 CERRXIAN RS232 to Ethernet Serial Device Server - TCP/IP Converter with 1Port DB9 RS232 Serial to Ethernet Connectivity
3 Review

🌐 StarTech.com NETRS2321P: 1-Port RS232 to Ethernet IP Converter, Serial over IP Device Server - Black
5 Review

🔌 HOYOKI 9 in 1 USB C Hub Adapter: Ethernet 1000Mbps, 4K HDMI, 3 USB 3.0 Ports, 5Gbps USB-C Data, 100W PD Thunderbolt 3, SD/TF Slots for MacBook, Dell XPS and More Type C Devices
6 Review

iVANKY MacBook Pro Docking Station, 9-in-2 USB C Hub Adapter with 4K Triple Display, 100W PD3.0, Ethernet, 2 HDMI, USB-C 3.0, 2 USB-A 3.0, SD & TF for MacBook Pro/Air
9 Review