Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Micha Jwiak ᠌ photo
1 Level
322 Review
0 Karma

Review on 11" Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 11 SM-T875 (2020), RU, 6/128 GB, Wi-Fi + Cellular, stylus, silver by Micha Jwiak ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The quality is so-so, the price does not match the quality.

To summarize, I don’t know how poor the device needs to go or how far from the level of modern technology to be happy with this tablet. I have an ancient xiaomi mipad 1, bought at the start even for about 13k, it still works and earns its money honestly, it naturally has disadvantages, but it costs little. I don’t know why they ask for 65k here, if I take my experience from the purchase, I would only use such a device if I got it as a gift or got it for ~ 40k. 6/128 memory in a device for 65k is not solid, given that in Europe there is a version of 8/256, a screen for a triple, sound too, no wireless charging, IP68, no outstanding autonomy, poor equipment, in general, I have no idea where this comes from price tag. It's a pity, "on paper" not taking into account the lack of a jack, and other technical limitations known in advance, the tablet looked very good. Separate greetings to the Samsung quality control department. In a tablet for 65 thousand, a scattering of broken pixels, which I have not even seen on smartphones for a couple of thousand dialers.

Pros
  • I liked the stylus and how its robot is organized, the location of the button on the stylus is only inconvenient or you need to make pressing tighter, there are accidental presses. The tablet heats up, but there is no noticeable throttling, it's nice to play. The design is pleasant, the frames are thin but not so much that there is nothing to hold on to.
Cons
  • The screen is the biggest disappointment, I xs how someone likes it, but here it's just the level of xiaomi bought for 15k on the aliexpress sale. The screen has 2K+ resolution but the fonts are fuzzy and there is a certain feeling that the screen of this resolution is not enough, at the same time on a 27 inch PC monitor with a normal 2K resolution, there is no such problem. There is 120 hertz but it is practically not felt, since the tablet simply has a gigantic matrix response value, if I turn on 120 Hz on my IPS monitor, the picture is many times smoother there. HDR is also fake, from watching HDR content there is no wow effect like on TV or even a game monitor, that is, there is HDR, but you will not understand whether it is turned on or not. in addition, there is a terrible calibration, in the reviews everything is clearly according to tests, but in reality, white is yellow-green, blue is turquoise, and so on. Tablet demos in stores are calibrated normally, but bought ones have such calibration defects that Samsung does not recognize as a problem. This, judging by the forums, is not an isolated case, and personally, the bonus on my tablet is simply an exorbitant number of broken pixels, 12 pieces, maybe more, there is no magnifying glass to count. There is no antiglare, the brightness is also sufficient, under office lighting the screen is like a mirror Autonomy is difficult to evaluate for a couple of days of use, while it is not very good, somewhere ~ 15% of the battery per hour is spent when working in the browser. Sound. Poor AKG, they were apparently forced to put their logo on the tablet. There are 4 speakers, there is a stereo, they seem to be loud, they sound clean, but . There are no lower frequencies at all, that is, it's just 4 tweeters that can reproduce medium and high frequencies. The location of the speakers is unfortunate, using the tablet in a horizontal orientation, you close at least 2 speakers with your hand, and due to the diagonal and the DEX mode, it seems to be used in a horizontal mode. It would be better to put 2-4 speakers on the side of the screen, on the sides of the matrix, that is, the sound went to you, and not to the sides. There is no jack yet, I knew in advance of course, but in such a large tablet I don’t know why it’s not there.