Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Stanislaw Was ᠌ photo
1 Level
356 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 12/256 GB, Dual: nano SIM eSIM, black phantom by Stanislaw Was ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Second-rate goods, I wont buy any more.

CONCLUSION. As I understand it, the best way to change a smartphone is to wait a year or two, when, after the announcement, all childhood, youth and adult illnesses will be corrected for it. When there will be an information base on the model, pro tips, and . NORMAL PRICE! Has pros: I just liked the idea that I would own some kind of "flagship", with a magic pen and a fantastic camera. But it was not there! Got cons: NEVER EVER buy new high-end smartphones. This is a brick to which no demands can be made, because you will immediately be told that it is "perfect". 1. Copying the image from the old Samsung A-series to the new Samsung, with all the settings, copies, disks and accounts, took me a week, a WEEK, CARL! It's called "we don't care how you do it, we're somsung". There is not a single normal utility to copy applications and that's it without hemorrhoids. QUESTION: why choose the same manufacturer if it is still such an idiotic and inconvenient process? 2. With the next "ate" the connection of files broke - to mail, instant messengers, clouds. Somehow I managed to upload a photo to a disk, but I can’t send a single file anywhere. Support said that we will do the "opening" of the software and testing, and then we will give you a clean piece of this magic, with no guarantee of results. The services naturally said that it was necessary to "roll back" the firmware, for 2022, and also with an incomprehensible result. 3. This "good" slows down. People, imagine - a smartphone for 90+ mowers BRAKES. The camera is dull at times, the unlock is dull, the KEYBOARD is dull. At the same time, all tests say that everything is fine, and everything else seems to be running normal. I didn’t find any poor quality of communication there, I don’t know what and why they write about the quality of communication here. In my opinion, this is such a useless criterion that it is not even worth discussing.

Similar reviews