Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Jankowska ᠌ photo
1 Level
183 Review
0 Karma

Review on Canon EOS 5D Mark II Body Camera by Ada Jankowska ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

For my purposes, that will do! It just requires the purchase of a few additional lenses over time, and then I shall reach the pinnacle of bliss in photography! Has some pros Purchased at long last! I experimented with it when I was on vacation using a wonderful 35 mm lens, and it was just the right amount of magnification for my eyes. I took pictures of them in the gardens using a lens with a focal length of 70–200 millimeters and an aperture of 2.8. It was then that I realized the advantages of using a full frame camera; on a crop sensor, you can't practically do without a flash, but on a full frame, it's just a nice thing! I took the one and only camera, without bothering to compare it to any others; the focus was on the two lenses, which are very useless, but it functions normally. While there are a lot of people writing, I didn't see any issues with the autofocus; it scribbles and hits normally. I don't know where it is faster; in fact, it would be interesting to compare it with the Mark 3; but, I haven't had the opportunity to do so yet. By the way, I overheard a conversation between a famous photographer and another photographer. She expressed how much she enjoyed the autofocus mark 3; however, I felt that the quality 2 was superior because it did not have any plasticine faces. If they hadn't stacked up a lot of pixels with unmeasured noise reduction, he wouldn't have had a price tag attached to his name. And to shoot in a ravine - this is the slope of everything that needs to be changed, and it's heavy, and not all programs still see it. (I'm talking about 3 marks). Sadly, I don't have the time to reorganize both my body and my tools in such a radical way. Indeed, and a jeep shot on a full frame looks virtually exactly like a rav shot on a crop. ;) It should be obvious that this is a nizya to compare, but the person who does not have problems will be able to comprehend what I am saying. When I'm working on Projects, I'm responsible for photographing incredibly significant events, such weddings and other noteworthy natural occurrences. And any and all types of banquets, receptions, school and kindergarten shootings – there are plenty jeeps for the eyes, where you don't need to deal with toning. There, ACDSee will call your memory to the fore. After using my go-to camera, the Pentax K7, for years, there are no longer issues with the color balance in the 5d-2, which is another thing that I truly like about it. Maintains a level head. Sure, there is not nearly as much variety in the steps and the visibility as there is in the same K7, the colors are more muted, but the saturation can always be increased, and there is no mayhem when the mode is set to automatic. It shoots organically, and because of this, you are able to add color without having to deal with the dampening that parasitic tones cause. Some cons: The power button is one of my least favorite parts. I find its position and the way it splits into two modes to be complete nonsensical. You probably won't even recognize right away that M operates exclusively in the upper mode in the shape of a dash and that ON is a semi-automatic mode. Something went wrong while we were shooting—perhaps there was a problem with the memory card, but it's hard to believe—about two hundred photos didn't turn out. Even though they were visible on the screen, it seemed as though everything had been thrown off—but it hadn't been! I have already downloaded a number of programs in an effort to recover lost data, but not a single one of them was successful. Fortunately, all of the data was successfully recovered, except for the files that were essential. The vacation was ruined by such a terrible event. And the nature of whose error is unclear. After that, there were no problems with the card when tested after each shot was taken. The only pictures that are missing are ones that were taken with the screen turned off in an effort to conserve battery life, but because. I adjusted the settings while I was shooting, then I saw the frames, and when I threw them off, there was an abracadabra instead of files. I deleted them in a foolish manner, not realizing that these were apparently "pictures," but the programs were unable to restore them. The video mode is not a standalone option, like it was on the crop; rather, it must be activated and configured through the menu system. Yet, the quality is quite exceptional. You don't need to bring a video camera with you at any time. It's just a matter of getting used to it, that's all.