Review on 🤩 Capture Stunning Shots with the Canon EOS M50 Mirrorless Camera + Pixibytes Bundle by Adam Kowalski ᠌

Name: 🤩 Capture Stunning Shots with the Canon EOS M50 Mirrorless Camera + Pixibytes Bundle
Item: 🤩 Capture Stunning Shots with the Canon EOS M50 Mirrorless Camera + Pixibytes Bundle
Rating: 5

July 04, 2023

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

Olympus has a “heavy” menu, difficult to master, this largely influenced the fact that I did not advance further than filming in the machine. Canon's light and informative menu is a slightly different life. Plus, Canon provides a free Digital Photo Professional (DPP) application for editing RAW images (requires entering the machine's serial number). When I was mastering Olympus, I tried to “go into” GIMP, I saw a chic set of brushes and other drawing tools there. I understand that this was a very superficial view, but, nevertheless, I got the impression that I had gone somewhere wrong. And here, after a couple of weeks, I began to use RAW and try to edit it in DPP.
I'm already trying to shoot in modes other than full auto, but for the sake of objectivity, it should be noted that a considerable part of the path in mastering the vast and complex theory of digital photography has already been covered with Olympus.

Pros

Canon EOS M50 is positioned as a device for amateurs. So here are the impressions from an amateur. Used an Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II camera for several years. I used the camera exclusively in automatic mode, I will make some comparison with this Canon. The Olympus 14-42mm lens did not suit me, the photo quality did not suit me. With the Canon EF-M 15-45mm you get pretty decent photos. Compared to Olympus with 25mm f1.8 (a great lens, of course) and Canon, Canon has better color reproduction, better detail, but Olympus has better resolution. This difference is visible when viewed on a 24-inch desktop monitor, but it's not a huge difference. Along the way, I discovered that the Olympus's matrix is only a quarter of the full frame in area, but here it is still APS-C. The color palette of photos taken directly from the camera (JPEG format) is more saturated and bright in Olympus. But Olympus' RAW photos don't lend themselves very well to being improved with adjustments. But Canon's RAW photo can be significantly improved. With a little adjustment (in a more serious editor than DPP) the photos are very good, so much so that I decided to change the rating from 4 to five stars. Canon has a minimal number of buttons and dials. In my amateur opinion, this is better than the somewhat "overloaded" Olympus controls. Canon's grip is noticeably more convenient, the menu is much more convenient. About the menu a little more in the comments.

Cons

In my opinion, this Canon is better than my Olympus in everything but compactness. I'm not even trying to compare Canon and Olympus with the kit M. Zuiko ED 14-42mm, but with the M. Zuiko Digital 25mm f1.8, the Olympus device is 2 cm narrower in depth than Canon's with the kit EF-M 15-45mm in working condition. I join the opinion of those who in their reviews noted the weakness of the battery.