Review on City backpack POLAR П1955, black by Mateusz Maycha ᠌

Absolute top-tier quality. When you really need to give something 6 stars out of 5! For nine years, it was a part of their everyday routine. At this point, I'm considering replacing it. I'd like to try something different, so I'm going to grab a Polar P1956 (it's the same backpack, but with a slightly different design). For "dirty" expeditions (caves, abandoned objects, etc.), I plan to use this backpack as a backup. Employed Experts: - Convenience (straps, double zippers, and a padded back) - Reliability (many branded backpacks fail after two years), which is a common complaint with the competition. At the very least, this one has a 5-year lifespan. - Capacity (the optimal size for use in the city is 27 liters) - Usefulness (several pockets and dividers for organizing tiny stuff). Design (a few other models share the same basic features). Reasonable cost (when compared to alternatives). Negatives: - I see other individuals carrying identical backpacks on the street once or twice a month. This information (that the backpack won't be special) may be crucial for some people. If you choose a red model instead of a black one, for instance, you'll get one hundred times less hits. Skateboard, snowshoe, and ski bindings are not included. The plastic belt carabiner gave out after 5 years (my bad, kids stepped through it a few times), the main compartment's zipper gave out after 9 years, and the floor of the main compartment was worn through in two places after 8 years of use. To me, it's not that big of a deal because. simple to replace, especially taking into account the regularity with which the item is used (you can always sew, sew in a new zipper, or buy a new carabiner).