Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Anglari Georgiev ᠌ photo
1 Level
252 Review
0 Karma

Review on Renewed BOSE SoundSport Wireless 🎧 Headphones in Black - High-Quality Sound on-the-go! by Anglari Georgiev ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

A little bit not what I expected, generally fine.

The evaluation of sound quality is a thankless task because everything is subjective and a HUUUUGE role is played by many factors, including a pause between the tested samples (more than a minute - and your listening went through the forest, and I also exaggerated about the time, preferably for switch to another sound for a few seconds in general), wear and tear on the ear or hearing throughout the day, an incorrectly chosen musical composition (sometimes the quality of a studio recording), and many I can only say that today I listened to a lot of music, compared, and specifically I listened to this model SIMULTANEOUSLY with the Bose SoundSport Free and Sport Earbuds, the Bose SoundTrue Ultra (which I have had for several years, but not because they are so melodic, but because of the comfort in the ear, because only Bose makes earbuds of this shape), and other models. When I refer to the Sennheiser CX400BT TWS and the SoundSport wireless sound as average, I grade these as BOTTOM. Consequently, SoundSport wireless headphones perform somewhat differently but on par with SoundTrue Ultra. The scene, the transparency of the sound (so that it doesn't sound like it's coming from a pan; this is typical, for example, for monitors with big, CLOSED ears), the BALANCE of frequencies, not the obsession of any one (so that it doesn't shoot in the cymbals' ears and doesn't hit the head with an excessively protruding b), and more subtle issues are what I'm referring to. Both test candidates are about: I want a little bottoms, I want more transparency in the center, and I want to add brightness to the tops. However, despite the equalizer's ability to perform all of these things, it is unable to give the candidates a natural sound; instead, it produces a slight saucepan sound or chamber. The interesting thing is that you may easily rate any of them as good if you simply switch them on when you get home. Because there will be a significant delay in time between now and when you could simultaneously compare, say, with SoundSport Free, whose audio is MUCH better than the focus of this article. However, following a break in the test, you will probably already have forgotten about that distinction.

Pros
  • We have the following benefits because + wireless + ons are well-positioned and fairly functional + branded oval-shaped Bose tips that do not need to be inserted into the ear to listen to music: 1. There is essentially no earwax present (much less than with conventional plugs). 2. The pressure of the rubber around the perimeter does not cause the ear to weary. 3. There are no issues with the choice "for yourself," since some common plugs do not fit snugly and occasionally even when you open your mouth, they loosen up, allowing noise to re-enter through the space that was created. This happened to me with Sony plugs.
Cons
  • - MEDIAN sound quality (in comparison to inexpensive and costly ones, in absolute terms) - inadequate noise isolation (especially when compared to the Bose SoundTrue Ultra, but they are not the best at it - punishment for oval non-plug-in nozzles) - bluetooth 4.1 - microusb - operating time - and the inability to charge from their own casing, unlike their older brothers