Review on Robot vacuum cleaner Roborock S7 Global, white by Mria Lnrd ᠌
It was a bad idea to buy it, the money was wasted.
So, here's my tale. I finally caved to all the praise for this product and bought it. Put in 37 (!) Extra Hours and wouldn't accept payment. He was happy while working: he mapped the flat, swept the carpets, and mopped the laminate and tiles. I reported, and they say it's done. The iRobot, in its final iteration after 6 years of simplicity, was the realization of a utopian ideal of effortless housework. In reality, the provider declined to honor the guarantee on the grounds that the vacuum is already full. Only the water contained within the vacuum cleaner itself was present. See the additional file for clarification on what the photographs showed. Water is poured into the turbine, which he carries, as a matter of course. To sum up: a total letdown. I don't provide advice, but if you ask me for one thing, it's that you don't use wet cleaning. The company offered to pay $5,400 to rectify it, but I'm too lazy to bother with consumer protection or the court at this point. In conclusion, I'm selling my flooded Craftsman S7 compressor for $30,000. It has 37 hours of use, three weeks of operation, and all of a sudden, there are fans. PS I walk around with the airbot in my hands; it's useless, it attaches to everything, but it can be detached. That is the way things turn out.
- Everything was good when I emerged. It's possible that I'm just unlucky.
- Warranty refused because tk. was wet; broke after 37 hours of use. It appears that he feeds water from a napkin into the turbine. As opposed to S5, where the board was on top, it is now at the bottom. A napkin soaked with water crawls 2 centimeters away from the turbine at a frequency of 50 hertz, indicating that there is a breach in the rubber seal surrounding the turbine. This is how he died: he slowly drained the battery until it was dead, and then he Ped out of the docking station. At first I blamed the battery, but it wasn't that.
