Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Boyan Zlatev ᠌ photo
1 Level
278 Review
0 Karma

Review on SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch Active2 (Aqua Black, R820-44mm) πŸ“± with Bluetooth, Silicon Strap, and Aluminum Bezel - International by Boyan Zlatev ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Absolutely unusable product, not suitable for use.

Then I went out and got this wonder for myself. For the record, Rosset is priced at 25 thousand. To put that another way, the asking price is already quite high. The watch itself isn't terrible; it's manufactured cool, has good animation, and looks fashionable. However, this is in no way functional. The software that runs on them is in no way crafted from the word up. One average yi, or one of the official applications. In general, I do not comprehend how it is possible to market a product in the year 2022 that does not include instant messaging services such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and so on. You are unable to view dialogues or switch, replies are not convenient, you are unable to listen to audio notes, you are unable to watch videos, you are unable to give audio notes, and you are unable to talk over a call in the messenger. Notifications do not show pictures or stickers, and you are unable to see dialogues or switch. Auto-awakening also functions very poorly when the watch is turned to the face, working only one time out of every five or six times. Is the year 2022 the year of release for this watch? Everything that I just listed under the negatives can be accomplished with an Apple Watch. Take into account the price of the Apple Watch from the previous generation, and you'll see that the current model is, on average, less expensive. If it were feasible to connect to an Android, I would move to them right away because they do not have any competitors at the present, even if their costs are nearly same to those of their rivals. They overprice the market pricing, but they manufacture a half-baked product with a vast number of negatives and nuances, exposing themselves once again, to put it bluntly, as a corporation with no logic, no brains, and no accountability. In summary, Samsung has the same story. They overprice the market prices, but they make a half-baked product. You could put a price tag of fifteen thousand dollars on it, and nobody in the whole wide world would dispute it in any way, but no. Dementia and bravery, there's really nothing else to add.

Pros
  • Stylish, of great quality, having good sketching capabilities, having good native programs developed by Samsung, and having good charge retention. However, that is not sufficient.
Cons
  • - The native notification system is responsible for delivering all notifications in the same manner. This means that in order to view a notification, you must simply look for a message from a specific application that contains a specific notice. If only one message arrives, then you will only be able to read the text, but if they send two or more messages at once, then you will only be able to see the text, and the location of the photo will be labeled as [photo]. This scenario occurs very infrequently. What are your thoughts on that, Elon Musk? While you are launching rockets there, Samsung will write the word "photo" in the place of the photo for a price of twenty-five thousand hours. I have not yet voiced any opinions regarding audio notes, stickers, movies, or any other kind of navigation within messages; however, this is an extremely unnecessary addition. neither listen, record, nor transmit anything, nor view anything. To put it another way, it is more convenient to simply view the notification that has arrived without any more information. And finally, if this is only ONE message, you will only need to open the bodies if there are two or more messages to read or view. If there are only video or audio messages, you will only need to open the bodies. To put it another way, in light of the existing circumstances, eighty percent of these notifications are pointless. In a nutshell, if there was no software, then that would be all there is to say about it five years ago when it would have been important. Even messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, as well as any form of tracker for activities like skiing and snowboarding, do not exist. And if there are any applications, they are written on the knee of a crippled person; they cost between three hundred and six hundred dollars; and they are a complete failure in every way: they function incorrectly, are not ated, there is no support, and so on. It is true, and it is important to make note of the fact that there are good sports applications available from major markets, such as endomondo and others. A drop in the ocean, but nonetheless)) - the sleep phases are not calculated correctly. This means that I can get up, lie down and sit on the phone, have time to accomplish anything at work, and sometimes even talk on the phone itself, but the fact that I got up is counted by the clock only after I get out of bed. This is despite the fact that I can get up, lie down, and sit on the phone at the same time. There, the clock keeps track of the stages of my sleep and the depth to which I fall asleep; despite this, the amount of time I spend sleeping there continues to decrease. These kinds of junk were not discovered on the same mi bands for 1.5k. I track my sleep and the time that I go to bed, and sometimes it's necessary to look at the history. After a week, you don't recall, so naturally, you lay around for ten minutes, or thirty to forty. This is a significant moment for me.

Similar reviews