Review on Smartphone Apple iPhone Xs Max 256 GB, nano SIM+eSIM, gold by Kiril Nikolov ᠌

The 11 Pro Max lacks a number of camera features that would improve its use and battery life, including a wide-angle lens, QuickTake, DeepFusion, and improved low-light photography. Therefore, I used a value of 4ki for both of these factors. However, these variations "result" in a substantially reduced cost and less mass (a matter of subjective plus or minus). There were no other noticeable deviations. For myself, this phone was a lot better investment than the 11 Pro Max, which I would have bought if the primary camera had taken center stage. Nonetheless, the camera is top-notch, with outstanding stabilization. There are no delays or glitches, and everything is doing its job. In summary, the phone has exceeded my expectations. When it came time to replace my old SE, I waited a long time for the new SE but was disappointed to see the new SE2022 as I had expected a more distinctive "piece" from the company. Because I haven't used an Android device in a long time and because this is a slightly different question (with some philosophical underpinnings), I avoid making comparisons. Both have benefits and drawbacks. I've attached some pictures taken with the phone that I think will be more helpful than a picture of the phone itself. All of these shots were taken "offhand" with my fairly shaky hands and without the use of a flash. . The texture quality was unfortunately "cut" a little by the system. Original content links: