Review on 💪 AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 Black Edition: 6-Core Processor with Unparalleled Performance by Ognian Nikolov ᠌

If we compare it to the products that are most similar to it, then it will be the same processors that are in the FX-6xx range from AMD, but they will already be using the Zambezi architecture (Bulldozers). Specifically, the FX-6100 and the 6200. The difference in pricing from 600 to 1000 r does not in any way justify the difference in braking power that the 6100 provides. In spite of the more eye-catching numbers included in the description, the performance of the 6200 does not match that of the 6300. In addition, the 6200 runs at a much higher temperature, which is why only motherboards with a maximum thermal design power of 95 watts are appropriate for it. i3, which Vischer's six-core processors from the same price category surpassed without straining, but i5 is already inferior in some aspects because it is compared to its Intel rivals. Having said that, taking into account the fact that the i5 is more than twice as pricey. In addition to these benefits, Intel possesses a number of additional advantages that are lacking in FX-6300. In particular, this features a decreased overall power consumption as well as an integrated graphics engine. But the second point is only relevant for laptops, not desktop computers (your electricity bill won't change as a result), and firstly, you don't need a graphics core (since almost everyone will take a standard video card anyway), and secondly, does it make sense to load the CPU with a useless graphics core when more than half of the AM3+ motherboards already have a graphical percentage of the Radeon HD 3000? In conclusion, the percentage that it offers for its price is excellent. Those who claim that the percentage is lower than that of the i3 either used a corrupted version of anything (for instance, a pirated version of Windows that is corrupted, which causes the entire system to be ineffective), or it's just intel-faggotria.