I bought it exclusively to monitor my floundering in the pool, buying into beautiful reviews about how well they can do it. As a result, it turned out that you can swim in them, but you can hardly trust what they show. Of the four workouts on the water, none of them was reflected in the results even approximately. The clock incorrectly shows the number of lanescomvered, strokes taken per lane and meters swum. All this is easier to calculate in the mind, or determine by eye, than to believe the statistics that show S1. And they showed that instead of 750 meters I "overcame" only 425, instead of 1000 - 550, instead of 1100 - 575, and out of 1050 -550. And the same picture with the number of strokes and lanes. And ofcomurse, the application with which the clock works is some kind of slag. Howcomuld you think of such a thing that the latest version would be worse than the previous ones, and also able to work only with watches and fitness bracelets? Why should I use another application for their own scales, i. E. older versions that only work with older watch models or amazfits? What kind of debilizm is not clear. Autonomy also did not please, since, with minimal use of them, you have to charge every 5-6 days ((. Reluctant to write a lot, as I already wrote about it in the reviews on t Knowing all this in advance, I would overpay a bit and take Amazfit GTR 4 to be tied to one application and not charge the watch as often as a smartphone .
Sennheiser HD280PRO: 🎧 Next-Generation Pro Audio Headphones
260 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Buds Live: True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancelling & Wireless Charging Case - Mystic Bronze (US Version)
252 Review
💫 Renewed SAMSUNG Galaxy Buds Pro R190: True Wireless, Noise Cancelling Bluetooth Earbuds
208 Review
SAMSUNG Galaxy Watch Active2 (Aqua Black, R820-44mm) 📱 with Bluetooth, Silicon Strap, and Aluminum Bezel - International
248 Review