The monitor has no significant drawbacks. For 10 it's a good and smart choice. Adequate picture. Cables included (including DP), transforming stand, usb hub. Neat, albeit a little clumsy appearance. In my case, there are no dead pixels. The rotation is tight, but down/up rides easily. Built-in speakers did not even check. The monitor does not have a pronounced "blockage" in any color, which, in this budget, is a big plus. The potential for settings, the margin of contrast and brightness is huge. But only AOC engineers were too lazy to make at least some suitable presets. I had to mix a lot of settings. But, after setting up questions to the image does not arise. By illumination. They are more pronounced than on my previous monitor with a matrix of the previous generation, but the backlight of the screen and the real white and black colors are much brighter, it burns out the eyes (with certain settings). Probably, the backlight technology has changed, in new matrices, therefore the glare is more pronounced, and all these nano-technologies appeared in descriptions, such as "weakening the blue color". But this applies, not specifically to this monitor, but to matrix models, in principle. I chose a monitor up to 20 I looked at TN monitors from 144Hz - not even close in color reproduction. I don’t play dotka and CSKA, I left the idea behind. I looked at IPS monitors much more expensive, in the designated budget - I didn’t really understand what to overpay for. Judging by the reviews - AOC is a lottery. Either the assembly technology is lame, or one of the two. But I was apparently lucky with AOC, for the second time. Many switching from TN monitors to IPS do not see the difference. In order to see it, in the video card settings you need to enable - full output dynamic range (off by default). At least with nvidia, it is.