Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Redziski ᠌ photo
1 Level
338 Review
0 Karma

Review on Kingston A400 120GB SATA SSD SA400S37/120G by Wiktor Redziski ᠌

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A useless product, its not worth the money.

If you use it as a non-system disk, then the tests are rather poor, but not so terrible. Extremely rarely, probably 1 time out of 25 tests, it gave out just the same extremely low write speed, about 50-100. Once, even copying files got stuck. The last screenshot shows how a 6 GB file is copied. At first, the speed is 380, but after 6 seconds it already drops to 52-38 and somewhere on average by 50, sometimes even by 40, and copying from one SSD folder to another is in progress. Health 100%, AHCI enabled. They say ating the SSD itself helps, but the firmware can not be found, and the official program writes that the ate is not required.

Pros
  • Good reading speed within 540-480. It helped to raise fps and its stability somewhat, where games constantly pulled the hard drive due to a lack of video card memory. Sorting small files of 20 MB or less by date in the amount of 15k pieces on the HDD in one folder took 4 minutes 55 seconds, on the SSD it was just 55 seconds, but on the SSD with Windows running from it, sorting takes 15 seconds.
Cons
  • The write speed is about 50 mb / s when the cache is clogged, apparently, it seems to me. A month or so was used for games, but one fine day I decided to put another Win 10 on it. I opened CrystalDiskMark 6 and instead of the usual 500/380, with over 60% occupancy, I saw 500/50. After starting the system, it can pass 2-3 more tests at an acceptable speed, but after that it rolls down to 50 again.