Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Chiyo Ogawa ᠌ photo
Inashiki
1 Level
115 Review
172 Karma

Review on πŸ’Ž Renewed AT&T Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, Silver, 64GB, US Version by Chiyo Ogawa ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

In general, everything is not bad, but I expected more.

This smartphone was a gift from them. At that price, I can't see myself purchasing it for myself. Pricey beyond any reasonable bounds. RAM up to 512 gigabytes; I do not require such a large amount. My current usage is 46 gigabytes. Even 64 gigabytes would be sufficient. However, they handed this one to me. It is identical to other android smartphones in terms of the functionality it offers. Everything and the same thing is available on smartphones that cost twenty to thirty thousand dollars. It's possible that the only thing that's worse is the camera, but the processor is definitely slower. There is a robust processor included, which is among the most robust mobile processors available today. But, I have no use for that either. I don't use it for any intensive activities, and I don't play games on it either. It would be sufficient for me to witness the power of a Huawei or Samsung device that costs 30,000 dollars. But, there is a shortage of RAM. It's laughable that you can get a smartphone with 4 GB of storage for more than 100,000. As a result of this, YouTube and music will occasionally become unresponsive. Maintains a restricted amount of processes in the background at any given time. Similar to low-cost androids. Regarding the layout, I won't comment on anything. On the one hand, it is uncomplicated, but on the other, it gives the impression of being expensive. The display is likewise standard, and it uses amoled technology much like on Samsungs, which are around twice as affordable. Yet, the display on the Samsung Galaxy S10 is noticeably more impressive, and its bezels are far narrower. The designers have done a good job at concealing the hefty bezels in this case. And bangs! Even on inexpensive Chinese products, they simply drill holes for the camera now. Because there are face scanners in this location in addition to the camera, bangs take up a significant amount of room in the image. When using androids, they make use of an under-screen fingerprint scanner that does not use any additional screen real estate. The life of the battery is rather impressive. Even 20–30% of the original quantity typically stays behind once the day is done. Yet Android cellphones, which are significantly less expensive, are also capable. The camera is really good, comparable to the quality of cameras found on more costly android devices that are still less expensive than this product. Why do I put up with all this? In addition, this is a standard smartphone, on which the operating system iOS and the operating system Android are functionally identical. Aesthetics, battery life, performance, and camera quality are all on par with premium Android flagships from Samsung, Huawei, and other manufacturers. Nonetheless, despite the fact that they are pricey, they are still over 1 1/2 times less expensive than this iPhone. The cost is simply unreasonably high.

Pros
  • - Design - Work pace - Battery for the camera retains a charge for an extended period of time
Cons
  • - The cost - The amount of RAM - The aging bangs

Similar reviews