Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Boyan Jakimov ᠌ photo
1 Level
284 Review
0 Karma

Review on MICHELIN Pilot Sport 4 SUV 255/50 R20 109 year old by Boyan Jakimov ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

And to wrap things up: the most wonderful tire for driving on the highway, as well as for wheel maniacs and tire aficionados alike. A regular person living in the city does not require it, and in any case, considering the price, it will not even come close to being profitable! Got pros: Honda CR-V vehicle. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV 100V in size 225/60 R18 produced in Poland. Comparing it to the Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV in the same size will help me make a more objective assessment of the product. During the 2022 season, a total of 16,170 kilometers were traveled, with little under 12,000 kilometers of those kilometers being traveled on highways. First things first - finding a balance between cost and weights of 15-20 grams per wheel, even though they hung 60-80 on the same Goodyear tire. After being placed on a vehicle at the end of April of this year, the system will have the capability of commanding another vehicle. The steering has a direct feel while also being very comfortable to operate. Impressions are quite favorable. High braking. I have no idea what rutting is for the season because I completely forgot about it. Because the tire appears to be adhering to the pavement, the likelihood of the car rolling over is noticeably reduced. On the other hand, I did not detect nearly any distinction between driving on a wet or dry road under the wheels. Even the wife, who has very little experience behind the wheel, noted that there had been a noticeable improvement in the way the vehicle performed. Although I wouldn't argue that they are noisier than Goodyear in terms of comfort, I can definitely tell that they are not quieter! But Michelin has a more difficult time swallowing the joints and bumps. The underside of the automobile sounded like it was being hit by a few small rocks. It was impossible to praise the Hong Kong and Crimean serpentines automobile. It was because of the tires that I did not notice any higher tones when I was accelerating to 120 miles per hour (180 kilometers per hour). With its drawbacks, the first and most obvious of which is the cost. When I went to the Siberia-Wheel chain store in February of this year, the price per bottle was 11,530, but it has since been raised to 14,510. And this is happening at the end of the summertime! The second issue is the amount of fuel used. Consumption went up by 0.3 liters per hundred kilometers by the end of the 2022 season, with a total mileage on the tires of 16,170 kilometers. It might not seem like much, but in order to travel this distance, the car burned through a "extra" 48 liters of gasoline. And according to the EU label (Euro label), the fuel efficiency of Michelin vehicles is announced with the "E" rating, whereas the fuel efficiency of Goodyear vehicles is declared with the "B" index. Since there is only a discrepancy of three letters, nothing unfair can be said about this situation! And finally, we have the resistance to wear. In this regard, Bibendum has unequivocally let us down. The tires on the front axle had 1 mm of wear, while the tires on the rear axle had 0.8 mm of wear. This is for a distance of 16 kilometers. Tires manufactured under the American brand have experienced a loss of 2.5-3 mm for over 64 thousand units. Despite the fact that everything is on a level playing field here, Treadwear has 220 French units and 440 American ones.

Similar reviews