Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Dang Linh Ngan ᠌ photo
Hanoi
1 Level
109 Review
219 Karma

Review on AMD Phenom II X4 940 💻 Black Edition 3.0GHz AM2+ Processor - Retail by Dang Linh Ngan ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I expected mediocre quality, but the product was pleasantly surprised.

The core speed of my AMD Phenom II X4 925 machine is 2.8 gigahertz per core. I did this at the beginning of 2022 with a computer. Of course, the i7 is not a rival to the aforementioned CPUs and should not be compared to them in the context of contemporary processors like the Core i5, AMD's Phenom II X4 Black Deneb (earlier version), AMD FX, or Intel's Xeon processors. The product is no longer nearly as new, and its price falls into a lower price range. Even in 2022, this processor is more than adequate "for the eyes" when compared to others in its price range, whether you use it for gaming or standard office tasks. I do not think that it makes any sense to change it at this time, which is close to the end of the year 2022. accelerated with overclocking to 3304 MHz (bus frequency 236, without changing the voltage and memory frequency). Experimenting with the voltage and reducing the memory frequency may allow you to achieve a result that is superior to what you are currently getting. I tried raising the bus frequency to higher levels, but in this case, Windows 7 is unstable and it keeps crashing with the "blue screen of death." Nonetheless, I believe I've had enough of this for the time being. The CPU heats up to between 72 and 73 degrees when the test is running at 100% load (with the cover of the system unit closed and with the table wall on the left). The temperature rises to no more than 56 degrees when the lid is taken from the table and subjected to the same weight. There is no difference between anything at 2.8 gigahertz, the normal frequency. a CoolerMaster-produced cooler. Yet because the pebble is a threatened species, I'll give it a final score of just four. I'm sorry, but I'm unable to give any specifics at this moment due to certain technical constraints and requirements. These are challenging for me to excel at. Look for a central processing unit (CPU) with a higher clock cycle frequency, such as starting at 3.5 gigahertz per core, if you're interested in buying a new computer with a four-core processor. Perhaps the AMD Phenom II X4 Black Deneb or AMD FX from the previous generation, or if you prefer Intel, the Core i5, i7. You should be aware that Intel, despite having a similar clock frequency, costs around two to three times as much. If you only use a small percentage of an Intel CPU's overall performance, consider whether it makes sense to pay more for a processor that is generally recognized as having higher power. After all, only a small number of tasks—such as video processing and engineering—require great performance. kernel. technology, etc. Video games, audio, and pictorial content are less prevalent.

Pros
  • a four-core, fully functional, high-performance processor that provides good value for the price range. It has a high potential for overclocking, theoretically (in practice, the maximum allowable limit has not been tested). After testing its maximum performance, it was discovered that using all 4 of its cores at 100% load was practically impossible. Due to the fact that it functions incredibly admirably for the majority of business jobs and games
Cons
  • He only "thinks" for an extended period of time during EXTREMELY complicated processes, such as the conversion of videos, the calculation of move options in complicated chess programs, and also, I suppose, in some other particularly complex engineering calculations. Yet doing such jobs is a quite different matter. They demand processors that have been specially configured for the time-consuming computing tasks that they necessitate.