Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Felicja Foktyska ᠌ photo
1 Level
61 Review
0 Karma

Review on Auger juicer Kitfort KT-1102-2, burgundy by Felicja Foktyska ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

In the past, I made juice using a centrifugal juicer. After the machine stopped working, the decision of whether to replace it or not arose. The high level of noise and the presence of a significant amount of froth in the juice were not to the centrifugal's liking. Even though it was a bit more expensive, we decided to go with the auger juicer. Models Kitfort KT-1101 and Kitfort KT-1102 were both available for us to choose from. We decided to go with the second model (the Kitfort KT-1102) since it has a more aesthetically pleasing appearance and a wider mouth for adding items. I had a good experience with the juicer because it operates in a very quiet manner, does a good job of squeezing the ingredients, and produces juice that is flavorful, consistent, and almost completely devoid of foam. Carrots, oranges, and apples were all used to make juice for the drink. It was decided not to dispose of the "dry" parts of the carrots and apples. The carrots that were pressed were used to make an omelette with carrots and apples, which were then baked into a pie. Previously, the apples had been cored and peeled. The fact that the cake did not include an excessive amount of moisture was a huge benefit. One of the drawbacks or nuances is that the juice contains pulp, whereas the pulp was virtually nonexistent in the juice produced by a centrifugal juicer. Although it is possible to pass through a sieve without the pulp if that is your goal, we found that we like it even more when it contained the pulp.

Pros
  • Price quality The degree of spin The flavor of juice Audible disturbances during the process
Cons
  • Pulp is necessary to extract juice from.