Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Eh Chit แ Œ photo
Bangkok
1 Level
122 Review
189 Karma

Review on ๐Ÿ’พ Seagate Compute 2TB Internal Hard Drive HDD โ€“ 3.5 Inch SATA for Desktop PC (ST2000DM01C) by Eh Chit แ Œ

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I'm not buying it, it's not up to standard, real junk, the quality is horrible.

a friend had 2 screws of this model at work, one has been working with a bad smart for a long time, but was used as a file cleaner, and the second was with a good smart, but suddenly just died with the data, took it to the service, threw the board from the second screw, there was no sense , added power, started up, removed the data, but it also went all with bads, ated the firmware to ss4n, did a surface test, a lot of unreadable sectors, the computer freezes with it, it can and will be used for file cleaning, but it is unlikely that Seagate is as it is in in all its glory, for me this name has long been synonymous with bad hard drives data at the time of writing the review from smart: 1608 inclusions 13186 operating hours serial w240abn6 firmware version ss4n Judging by the reviews, he still held out well you can consider me biased and biased, but once on the first PC with sempron, my first segate died after 2 weeks, under warranty it was replaced with wd, since then I have not seen screws from other offices in my PCs, but dead and half-dead segates, I saw a wagon and a small trolley from my friends, recently another 400GB crunched and smart began to swear, although a week ago the surface test did not show a single error, so draw conclusions I still drive this one with Victoria, and Iโ€™ll throw it away when it finally bends, well, or Iโ€™ll let it go on a magnet, itโ€™s also a good thing) but in general itโ€™s a pity, of course, when screws of such a volume with useful data are screwed on, people probably swear a lot, in vain the manufacturer produces such models, completely ruining his reputation

Pros
  • got free
Cons
  • reliability